I love music, and I'm not a fan of the music industry's business model. Record companies especially piss me off, as does the RIAA. Terrible stuff is cranked out year after year, untalented, autotuned, played on the radio, and marketed to teens. I think we can all agree to this. Meanwhile, indie musicians (I know I'm supposed to call them "independent" because the two are apparently different things now, but I honestly couldn't give a shit) like to try "new" things, play the kinds of music they want to play, and put a lot of value on talent and passion and heart. Which is good.
Now, these musicians claim that the big industry is hurting music. Which sounds logical at first. After all, it's not easy to make it big, or get famous and popular and rich and spread your music across the world, unless you buy into the record companies and make "marketability" a factor in your style. With me so far? Good.
Here's the kicker though: Many of these independent musicians say that wanting to become famous and rich IS the problem. The desire for money and popularity takes the heart and soul out of the music. Wait, what?
Ok, so maybe striving for maximum profit DOES take the heart and soul out of music. But how exactly does this industry harm music any? It only harms THEIR music. It only makes the marketed stuff more likely to suck. The music industry is only hurting the music industry's music. If independent bands don't want to hit it big and get rich, then the industry isn't hurting THEM. They still have guitars and microphones and computers. They can still make music all they want whether the industry exists or not. I fail to see how this affects independent music.
TL;DR for the lazies: If you're a musician who doesn't care about making big money or getting famous, the music industry isn't hurting you any, because it's not stopping you from making music and releasing it the way you want to.
Let me make one thing clear: I am by no means a Conservative. I don't like my market free. I like it chained up and whipped and regulated until it learns to behave like a good girl. That said, I also have a need to make sense. So tell me, am I missing something here?
Now, these musicians claim that the big industry is hurting music. Which sounds logical at first. After all, it's not easy to make it big, or get famous and popular and rich and spread your music across the world, unless you buy into the record companies and make "marketability" a factor in your style. With me so far? Good.
Here's the kicker though: Many of these independent musicians say that wanting to become famous and rich IS the problem. The desire for money and popularity takes the heart and soul out of the music. Wait, what?
Ok, so maybe striving for maximum profit DOES take the heart and soul out of music. But how exactly does this industry harm music any? It only harms THEIR music. It only makes the marketed stuff more likely to suck. The music industry is only hurting the music industry's music. If independent bands don't want to hit it big and get rich, then the industry isn't hurting THEM. They still have guitars and microphones and computers. They can still make music all they want whether the industry exists or not. I fail to see how this affects independent music.
TL;DR for the lazies: If you're a musician who doesn't care about making big money or getting famous, the music industry isn't hurting you any, because it's not stopping you from making music and releasing it the way you want to.
Let me make one thing clear: I am by no means a Conservative. I don't like my market free. I like it chained up and whipped and regulated until it learns to behave like a good girl. That said, I also have a need to make sense. So tell me, am I missing something here?