Sixcess said:It was drawn for the original script, which was only changed by DC's "last minute meddling", so whether or not it was used it's still official.Ferisar said:Because if this isn't official, and wasn't used despite being a wank fantasy...
The fact that DC pulled it is the only part of this story that surprises me, given the ludicrous amounts of T&A that the previous issues were filled with. I don't object to sexualisation in comics in itself, only to how badly implemented it was, with DC constantly pandering to the lowest common denominator and the worst stereotypes of comic book readers, of which this is (or if you insist, would have been) another prime example.
I'm glad you appreciate the phrase. I'd say it trips off the tongue, but that conjures up some unfortunate images.wank fantasy fantasy wank fantasy? wank fantasy.
WELLLLLL
To be totally honest, I don't read comics often (I think the only two comics I legit read from beginning to end were Red Son and Watchmen) or even at all, so this to me seemed like a no-brainer "of course they pulled it, what is that" type of situation. I guess if they have prior history of poor taste, then mwlehrh? Fuck 'em, but at least they did this more or less right. Do I think they're better on some global scale because of it? Probably not, but might as well not give 'em shit for something that was in poor taste and didn't happen.
EDIT:
Hank pant a seat. Tank rank cuisine? Spank fan artiste.
Wank fantasee.
I'M TRYING ALRIGHT.