Abandon4093 said:
You don't half labour these replies.
Apparently,
you do.
What do you mean an honest approach?
Not putting someone in a no-win scenario.
I'm not saying she'd have to use my exact phrasing. But if she's not telling him what she really thinks with relevance to the situation (which let's be honest, in a situation like this is likely.) then she's omitting.
Let's be honest, you don't know the mindset of Thestrals gf. You're assuming out of convenience and accusing her of lying.
Also saying 'everything is going to be okay' is a golden example of the kind of lie I'm talking about. She has no idea that everything is going to be okay. She's telling LT that because he needed to hear it.
And again, you're assuming motives you don't know and labeling the end result as a lie because ponies.
What, you don't consider phatic speech a form of lying? It's intentional insincerity in non-formal communication for the purpose of fitting in.
No, but you knew that from the rest of my response. At least, as long as your comprehension skills function.
I was being a bit hyperbolic when I said an entire breakdown of a morning. It was meant to be a bit of levity. Not to be taken literally.
Sorry, but you're arguing something very literally. Hard to parse a single 'joke' from what seems to be an earnest, if incorrect argument. The point remains.
What I'm saying is if you're passing someone and you ask "you alright" and their response is to say "no" and then give some sort of explanation as to why, then you're going to feel uncomfortable.
Again, not necessarily. A huge chunk of my statement you keep ignoring.
There are times when you ask that question to someone genuinely, usually if they don't look alright. But that's clearly not what I'm talking about or I wouldn't have brought up phatic utterances.
Except you're bringing them up in a context where such an absolute stance is irrelevant. Actually, there was no point at all to bringing it up unless you wanted to apply it to the conversation at hand. Are you saying that you understand social context but dishonestly brought it up as a distraction?
A lie is any deliberate concealment of the truth. No matter how great or small.
Then you DO think that not saying "left foot, right foot, left, right, left, right" is a lie?
Oh, turns out I did edit it.
Yup. But the original line was far more truthful of you.
Kinda? Well there you go, obviously lying.
You're either being honest or you're lying.
Except that's not the issue I was talking about. Your lines are absurd, not the concept that there is only truth and lies.
But telling him everything is going to be okay without precognition certainly falls into the acceptable lie category.
So a good faith statement is a lie. Gotcha.
You either lie or you don't.
Yes, now try addressing the part I'm actually contesting.
Abandon4093 said:
Not telling someone what you think to spare their feelings.
Nope.... sounds like honesty to me.
Now address what he ACTUALLY said.
Yea, if the thing you're being honest about is nice.
So the prior statements you made about the truth being a brutal thing were lies?
If you're not saying everything relevant, you're not being honest.
Oh, you changed your definition again.