You are assuming that this is an infinite loop of a never-ending scenario. If you assume time is not fixed and can be changed, that means you (when time travel was invented) decided to go back in time to tell yourself to do what you are doing. Thus creating a paradox of your own making.Gilbert Munch said:Name: The Teapot Paradox
Scenario: I am 10, and a future version of myself steps through a portal and hands me a teapot. Inside is this note: 'When you are 50, time travel will be possible. Hand this intact to your 10 year old self'.
Question: Where does the teapot come from? How old is it?
Woah, woah, woah, hold up.oppp7 said:It's a paradox. There is no answer. Besides, time-travel is impossible.
I see your point, and I am assuming that the time is fixed. However, as I said, there wasn't much thought placed into this and it's just a speculative idea.Timelord91 said:You are assuming that this is an infinite loop of a never-ending scenario. If you assume time is not fixed and can be changed, that means you (when time travel was invented) decided to go back in time to tell yourself to do what you are doing. Thus creating a paradox of your own making.Gilbert Munch said:Name: The Teapot Paradox
Scenario: I am 10, and a future version of myself steps through a portal and hands me a teapot. Inside is this note: 'When you are 50, time travel will be possible. Hand this intact to your 10 year old self'.
Question: Where does the teapot come from? How old is it?
But if what your saying is time is fixed and you cant change it, the paradox never started and will never end. Thus being a paradox with no inherent meaning other than to keep itself going.
Of corse you could always decide not to send yourself through time, this breaking the paradox, but that depends on wether time is fixed or not. Wether you control how the paradox ends, or wether (even by accident) you will go back in time, give yourself the teapot, and start again.
or even simpler, just write "this sentence is false" on a piece of paperEpitome said:Get a strip of paper
On one side write
"the sentence on the other side of this strip is true"
On the other
"the sentence on the other side of this strip is false"
The obvious answer is that the kid is 10 years old and on drugs... the teapot if an illusion made by his drug-screwed mind... Don't do drugs.GilbertMunch said:Name: The Teapot Paradox
Scenario: I am 10, and a future version of myself steps through a portal and hands me a teapot. Inside is this note: 'When you are 50, time travel will be possible. Hand this intact to your 10 year old self'.
Question: Where does the teapot come from? How old is it?
That is true, the teapot is the only item moving through time (assuming your older self goes back to the future). So it is constantly aging.Gilbert Munch said:I see your point, and I am assuming that the time is fixed. However, as I said, there wasn't much thought placed into this and it's just a speculative idea.Timelord91 said:You are assuming that this is an infinite loop of a never-ending scenario. If you assume time is not fixed and can be changed, that means you (when time travel was invented) decided to go back in time to tell yourself to do what you are doing. Thus creating a paradox of your own making.Gilbert Munch said:Name: The Teapot Paradox
Scenario: I am 10, and a future version of myself steps through a portal and hands me a teapot. Inside is this note: 'When you are 50, time travel will be possible. Hand this intact to your 10 year old self'.
Question: Where does the teapot come from? How old is it?
But if what your saying is time is fixed and you cant change it, the paradox never started and will never end. Thus being a paradox with no inherent meaning other than to keep itself going.
Of corse you could always decide not to send yourself through time, this breaking the paradox, but that depends on wether time is fixed or not. Wether you control how the paradox ends, or wether (even by accident) you will go back in time, give yourself the teapot, and start again.
What I thought was interesting about this concept was the nature of the teapot. It would, in theory, be infinitely old, and older than the universe by an infinite number of times. Perhaps when more thought is put into it it starts to fall apart under the scrutiny, but hey! I'm content with my everlasting teapot.
Now, if only I could put a gobstopper in this speculative time loop...
I disapprove of your avatar.8-Bit_Jack said:except that its not PROVEN that time is nonlinear. If time does not flow forward, as we percieve, and instead is some nonlinear mess of things happening at any point, then yes, this and most about all time paradoxes are rendered meaningless. however if time DOES flow in one direction, then this does present a possible paradox.
Gilbert Munch said:I disapprove of your avatar.8-Bit_Jack said:except that its not PROVEN that time is nonlinear. If time does not flow forward, as we percieve, and instead is some nonlinear mess of things happening at any point, then yes, this and most about all time paradoxes are rendered meaningless. however if time DOES flow in one direction, then this does present a possible paradox.
That is all.
Plus, I was first. *Wah, wah, I want my blanky* /talking like a kid
OT: For my original paradox, I like to assume that time flows in a straight line.
You Couarage Wolf. Me Philosoraptor.8-Bit_Jack said:Gilbert Munch said:I disapprove of your avatar.8-Bit_Jack said:except that its not PROVEN that time is nonlinear. If time does not flow forward, as we percieve, and instead is some nonlinear mess of things happening at any point, then yes, this and most about all time paradoxes are rendered meaningless. however if time DOES flow in one direction, then this does present a possible paradox.
That is all.
Plus, I was first. *Wah, wah, I want my blanky* /talking like a kid
OT: For my original paradox, I like to assume that time flows in a straight line.
i figured you might, but that is irrelevant.
Gilbert Munch said:You Couarage Wolf. Me Philosoraptor.8-Bit_Jack said:Gilbert Munch said:I disapprove of your avatar.8-Bit_Jack said:except that its not PROVEN that time is nonlinear. If time does not flow forward, as we percieve, and instead is some nonlinear mess of things happening at any point, then yes, this and most about all time paradoxes are rendered meaningless. however if time DOES flow in one direction, then this does present a possible paradox.
That is all.
Plus, I was first. *Wah, wah, I want my blanky* /talking like a kid
OT: For my original paradox, I like to assume that time flows in a straight line.
i figured you might, but that is irrelevant.
But seriously... please? Because what you wrote above seems to imply that you... took my avatar? And it's not irrelevant, I like to have my own identity on this forum.
[small]No one point out that having a meme as my avatar makes me almost identity-less...[/small]