But the Weighted Companion Cube loves you and would never hurt you.MaxTheReaper said:They hurt you because they love you.
PC games are like...a dominatrix.
Console games are a pillow.
A really good pillow will not hurt you at all. It is also fairly cheap.
However, it does not love you.
A really good dominatrix is designed to hurt you. It is also very expensive (I am assuming.)
Therefore, it loves you whole bunches.
In this equation, love is equivalent to "goodness."
Therefore, PC games are better than console games, fact.
The important point is what I put in bold. You do an exam because you have to, you play Braid because you want to. It all goes back to Johan Huizinga definition of play:" Quizzes are considered games, but exams aren't, though formally, they're pretty similar: you answer hard questions, but you do one for fun and the other because you have to.
Braid is, on some level, like an exam. "What makes Braid a game?" Samyn asks. "Its rules, goals and challenges? No. Because the same format can apply to something that is not a game (an exam, e.g.). On some level, Braid is serious. Like an exam."
Playing Braid being a voluntary activity, and following the other conditions of play according to this definition, Braid, like The Path, is a game.Play is a voluntary activity or occupation executed within certain fixed limits of time and place, according to rules freely accepted but absolutely binding, having it's aim in itself and accompanied by a feeling of tension, joy, and the consciousness that it is "different" from "ordinary life"
The comment really should be seen as him saying that you cannot feel achievement unless it feels like you have beaten something tangible, an game AI is just a piece of code, but a person thinks, feels, hungers, they have functions other than simply existing for the sake of the game.Keane Ng said:As regards this "particularly don't like games" bit, this is what he said in full:
He said it, but I think he might have done so a bit playfully, at least I hear that. My bad for making that unclear, but I think you can read it more than one way.I don?t particularly like games. That?s true. I won?t go out of my way to play a game of chess or hide and seek. And I?m not exactly thrilled when my daughter wants me to join her game of Legos or Playmobil.
I don't remember hearing about his game provoking physical or mental torture of peopleCpt Big Mac said:This guy needs to get his thoughts in order. Also, if you dont like games, dont make them, because then gamers like us suffer.
Agreed. He really doesnt seem to understand thatxmetatr0nx said:Wow pretentious? Lighten up buddy, you work in the gaming industry dont take yourself so seriously.
Probably. The guy hurt my brain with his schizogaming disorder rant.teh_gunslinger said:I think what he said was that there needed to be a point in losing and that someone has to win as well.samsonguy920 said:Reading to what this guy was saying, all I could hear in my head was, "Sounds like those people who think paint blown on a canvas by a jet turbine is art." He says he doesn't play games, and yet he plays chess, and has fun with it. Seriously, how many games that have been released for either PC or console relate in a significant degree to chess? And he rants about losing like it's a disease. Losing isn't the endall buddy, it's the point where you pick yourself up and learn from your mistakes, not sit and cry and never tackle the game again. If that was the rule the Red Sox would never have made it to the top.
Um, no.Keane Ng said:With games, he says "nobody really wins.
BattleAxeInc said:Um, no.Keane Ng said:With games, he says "nobody really wins.
I win.
You just suck at games.