Hey guys.
Battlefield 3 is coming out. Pretty cool. Now, we all (hopefully) know that this is the internet, and we all know that people on the internet like to be dicks, but I want you to take a look at yourself. On November 8, Modern Warfare 3 is coming out. What just went through your mind? If it involves something like "lol mw3 noobs cod is shit", I have something for you-
The Call of Duty franchise is not the best-selling game franchise in history for nothing. The games are fun. I enjoy them, your friends enjoy them, people as awesome as our own Gavin Dunne enjoy them. I also enjoy Battlefield. They possibly do, too.
Take a moment to consider if you're on a bandwagon. Look yourself in the eye and tell yourself that your opinions really are your opinions. If you can actually be sincere, cool. Good for you. But don't ***** about it here.
Now, the BF3 reviews are coming in. I've already seen several posts accusing the reviewers of giving in to hype and bribery. I also have something for you-
Reviewers are smarter than you think. Chances are they've been working in the industry for a fucking long time, especially the ones that are chosen to review big-name releases. Don't sit there accusing that their opinions are the skewed ones. They know what hype is, and their entire fucking job is to be objective (or, at the very least, more objective than the zero-bombing douchenozzles you see in user reviews). Of course, no one is perfect, but out of the 16 reviews for BF3 that have been released, don't even try to tell us that every single one of them is boosting a terrible or average game's score into the 8s-9s and up.
And a few last things-
-Obviously, there's a lot of criticism for "realistic", "brown", "modern", or whatever-the-hell-else shooters. There is absolutely nothing wrong with the genre. The reason there are so many is because they work. Even an average one like Homefront is still pretty enjoyable (now, if you're inherently not an FPS fan, this obviously doesn't apply to you).
-I should say something about Call of Duty. While I do enjoy the games, the controls are shit and unresponsive, the games are almost broken beyond recognition, The graphics look like they're from a Nintendo 64, and the multiplayer is one of the most boring experiences this generation. If you agree with me, guess what? Everything I just said is the opposite of the truth, and your opinion is probably distorted. Take another look at the second paragraph.
-Don't hate on Call of Duty 4. Really. All it wanted to do was make one of the best online multiplayer experiences of the generation. Say what you will about the newer ones, it didn't do anything wrong.
-Swinging back to the review discussion, MW3 will receive some high reviews. These reviewers know about the CoD hate. Haters automatically believe that reviewers are mindless corporate-whores who think "HERP DERP COD IS POPULAR 10s AND 9s FOR EVERYTHING". You know that sounds like? Replace 10 and 9 with 0 ad 1.
Thinking about flaming me for this post?
Battlefield 3 is coming out. Pretty cool. Now, we all (hopefully) know that this is the internet, and we all know that people on the internet like to be dicks, but I want you to take a look at yourself. On November 8, Modern Warfare 3 is coming out. What just went through your mind? If it involves something like "lol mw3 noobs cod is shit", I have something for you-
The Call of Duty franchise is not the best-selling game franchise in history for nothing. The games are fun. I enjoy them, your friends enjoy them, people as awesome as our own Gavin Dunne enjoy them. I also enjoy Battlefield. They possibly do, too.
Take a moment to consider if you're on a bandwagon. Look yourself in the eye and tell yourself that your opinions really are your opinions. If you can actually be sincere, cool. Good for you. But don't ***** about it here.
Now, the BF3 reviews are coming in. I've already seen several posts accusing the reviewers of giving in to hype and bribery. I also have something for you-
Reviewers are smarter than you think. Chances are they've been working in the industry for a fucking long time, especially the ones that are chosen to review big-name releases. Don't sit there accusing that their opinions are the skewed ones. They know what hype is, and their entire fucking job is to be objective (or, at the very least, more objective than the zero-bombing douchenozzles you see in user reviews). Of course, no one is perfect, but out of the 16 reviews for BF3 that have been released, don't even try to tell us that every single one of them is boosting a terrible or average game's score into the 8s-9s and up.
And a few last things-
-Obviously, there's a lot of criticism for "realistic", "brown", "modern", or whatever-the-hell-else shooters. There is absolutely nothing wrong with the genre. The reason there are so many is because they work. Even an average one like Homefront is still pretty enjoyable (now, if you're inherently not an FPS fan, this obviously doesn't apply to you).
-I should say something about Call of Duty. While I do enjoy the games, the controls are shit and unresponsive, the games are almost broken beyond recognition, The graphics look like they're from a Nintendo 64, and the multiplayer is one of the most boring experiences this generation. If you agree with me, guess what? Everything I just said is the opposite of the truth, and your opinion is probably distorted. Take another look at the second paragraph.
-Don't hate on Call of Duty 4. Really. All it wanted to do was make one of the best online multiplayer experiences of the generation. Say what you will about the newer ones, it didn't do anything wrong.
-Swinging back to the review discussion, MW3 will receive some high reviews. These reviewers know about the CoD hate. Haters automatically believe that reviewers are mindless corporate-whores who think "HERP DERP COD IS POPULAR 10s AND 9s FOR EVERYTHING". You know that sounds like? Replace 10 and 9 with 0 ad 1.
Thinking about flaming me for this post?