So I do not know how many people here have watched the show Alphas, but along with the many problems in the show I noticed something that bothers me. In Alphas you basically have the "good mutants, the good alphas" and "the bad mutants, the bad alphas". The show has soo many narrative problems, that I would rather not get into, but in short the characters come off as relatively unlikable, inconsistent, and also as unknowingly assisting the government doing horrible things. In an effort to make our "heroes" seem just they depict all the bad alphas as abusing their powers, and ultimately worthy of incarceration...and worse.
The show basically tries to justify the good guys as being good, because showing truly empathic characters consistently on "the other side" makes things more questionable.
Perhaps I'm oversimplifying but basically like so many shows the majority of the bad guys are almost "overly bad" in order to make the protagonists look better. To a certain extent this is always done in narrative...but to me Alphas an other shows build everything up as almost unrealistic. There is simply not enough there besides "bad guy is bad" that makes me, as a viewer, root for the protagonists. Then you have the antagonists, who honestly have the very valid reasoning for their actions, who are comprised of primarily irredeemable characters.
To me shows where it feels like the antagonist is only dramatically evil to make the protagonist seem good, suffer from a narrative flaw. It can be done well, Dexter, for example, features a character who does morally wrong(depending on who you ask) things, but he comes off as having good characteristics...then his antagonists are depicted as relatively balanced characters. Even the "evil" antagonists are interesting and are more complex than just being bad.
Are their other shows that are consistently depicted as being like this?
What do you guys think about this ploy in narrative?
The show basically tries to justify the good guys as being good, because showing truly empathic characters consistently on "the other side" makes things more questionable.
Perhaps I'm oversimplifying but basically like so many shows the majority of the bad guys are almost "overly bad" in order to make the protagonists look better. To a certain extent this is always done in narrative...but to me Alphas an other shows build everything up as almost unrealistic. There is simply not enough there besides "bad guy is bad" that makes me, as a viewer, root for the protagonists. Then you have the antagonists, who honestly have the very valid reasoning for their actions, who are comprised of primarily irredeemable characters.
To me shows where it feels like the antagonist is only dramatically evil to make the protagonist seem good, suffer from a narrative flaw. It can be done well, Dexter, for example, features a character who does morally wrong(depending on who you ask) things, but he comes off as having good characteristics...then his antagonists are depicted as relatively balanced characters. Even the "evil" antagonists are interesting and are more complex than just being bad.
Are their other shows that are consistently depicted as being like this?
What do you guys think about this ploy in narrative?