Recently I've decided my fellow man is so infuriatingly stupid, it's best to ignore them.
Radicals rarely get their way anyways
Radicals rarely get their way anyways
Decent argument until this statement. I've mentioned this before... statements like these only throw fuel onto their fire. When you say anything like this, they all look and say "See! We were right!"FargoDog said:Fuck the PTC. They should all go die in a car fire.
It wouldn't be that hard. In fact, I'm with you on this. Every single time anyone comes out and says something stupid like these guys are doing, we should have a pre-written document to show them. All their arguments are the same and all our arguments are the same, so why not just have something already written down, not only so we wouldn't have to repeat ourselves day after day, but to show them that their idea aren't original and are always shot down.Chamale said:Maybe we can just write a generic list of responses to these people? It's the same thing year after year, and about 2 pages should cover all of the anti-game arguments.
Don't know. How did people feel when they were told they were sex-obsessed lunatics for daring to listen to such scandalous acts as Elvis? How did my mom feel when she was, at twelve, told she was a tramp because her mother had died? How did I feel when people said my copy of The Complete Psionics Handbook meant I was a baby-murdering Satanist?EricII said:So the question stands, Escapist, how do you feel about "assuming the role of the most despicable people to walk the Earth" merely based on the fact that you play videogames?
assuming the role of the most despicable people to walk the Earth
I'm in complete agreement too. We need a pre-written document for this, something to end this stream of the same responses.ProfessorLayton said:It wouldn't be that hard. In fact, I'm with you on this. Every single time anyone comes out and says something stupid like these guys are doing, we should have a pre-written document to show them. All their arguments are the same and all our arguments are the same, so why not just have something already written down, not only so we wouldn't have to repeat ourselves day after day, but to show them that their idea aren't original and are always shot down.Chamale said:Maybe we can just write a generic list of responses to these people? It's the same thing year after year, and about 2 pages should cover all of the anti-game arguments.
Oh, Bravo, i thought i'd be the first to congratulate you on this- but we both know these people don't like their extremely closed minds being argued against with anything as paltry as logic, current retailer policy or simple reasoningbloodmage2 said:well, here's a letter i have written to them. if you want, copy paste it and email it, one person's email might not do anything, but a couple hundred might...
i doubt any human will read this, but on the off-chance that one does: please check your facts. what little you have displayed on your site is
A: very loosely factually based,
or
B: completely made up on the spot, or to put it less generously, Bullshit.
one particularly egregious example is your completely false assertion that minors can purchase AO games, which, while no law actually prevents this, retailers are STRONGLY encouraged to prevent such sales, and most, if not all, retailers have policies in place to prevent such events (such as firing of employees in breach of these policies). minors clearly under the age of a games rating must have a consenting guardian present to purchase such games.
for starters, any study that is conducted by a non-biased group (i.e. religious organizations), is automatically invalidated, so that throws out about 99% of your "evidence". the remaining 1% is fallacy. i have little hope of crow baring into you this concept, but here goes nothing: games are not just about the violence, sex, and what have you. most games are laughed at and made fun of if it has a over the top level of the above. i apologize that any new concepts scare you half to death, but you should at least try to actually understand them before flinging insults like a angry chimp.
here is my one and only message to you: stop attacking games. they aren't the problem. anything is good is moderation. so, how's about you stop trying to make the government do your work, and think about this: who lets minors buy mature games? the developers, for making the games in the first place? NO. the retailers, for having the games in stock? NO. the parents, who thick-headedly allow their little bags of whine to play games that are explicitly stated to be inappropriate for children of their age, and having been discouraged multiple time by the employees, and actually provide the money for the transaction in 8 out of 10 times? hmm, that's just my opinion, but hey, give it a little thought, if you even have enough grey matter to rub together outside of what you have allocated for dogmatic horseshit.
Oh man, you went down the rabbit hole and pulled me with you. I just spent the last hour going through posts on that Facebook page, and these people are just bat-shit crazy. Some of the twisted logic in the comments section -- no, all of it, it all makes my brain hurt.Rain Spider said:http://www.facebook.com/topic.php?topic=14672&post=63765&uid=80392814444#post63765 trolled long and hard but found a place to comment
I know you werent being serious, but all the worst serial killers, David Parker Ray, Ted Bundy, The Chessboard Killer and others, all came Before Video Games.Douchebag intent said:About time someone has enough gull to stand up to video gamers.
Did you know that most violent criminals and rapist may have played or herd of video games?
That alone is enough evidence to condemn you horrible baby eating bastards.