The sequel crazed world...

Recommended Videos

thedelightfulme

New member
Apr 16, 2009
194
0
0
Is it just me or are sequels being made for JUST ABOUT ANYTHING?
I mean Crank 2? WTF!?
Lake Placid 2?
Without a paddle 2?

WHY!? Why make a sequel for something that DOESNT NEED ONE?!

Anyone else know of any other really annoying sequels?
 

Trilby

New member
Sep 13, 2008
151
0
0
thedelightfulme said:
misterprickly said:
...snakes on a TRAIN...
Snakes on a TRAIN!? WTF!? I thought snakes on a plane was bad enough. Jees. Who that that was a good idea?!!
I like the idea of Snakes on EVERY plane. [http://xkcd.com/107/]
 

tk1989

New member
May 20, 2008
865
0
0
thedelightfulme said:
Is it just me or are sequels being made for JUST ABOUT ANYTHING?
I mean Crank 2? WTF!?
Crank 1 was the meaning of awesomeness and Jason Statham is a god! Crank 2 was a much needed sequel, just like transporter 2 and 3! :p hahaha

thedelightfulme said:
misterprickly said:
...snakes on a TRAIN...
Snakes on a TRAIN!? WTF!? I thought snakes on a plane was bad enough. Jees. Who that that was a good idea?!!
Snakes on a Train wasnt a sequel, it was a crappy rip off of the film which goes by a similar name; a cheap tactic in the hope that ill informed parents will buy said film instead of the genuine one.
 

properturnip

New member
Mar 30, 2009
75
0
0
thedelightfulme said:
misterprickly said:
...snakes on a TRAIN...
Snakes on a TRAIN!? WTF!? I thought snakes on a plane was bad enough. Jees. Who that that was a good idea?!!
I remember seeing that film in HMV once, and I was filled with a mixture of disgust and intruige. As much as Snakes of a Plane was amusing in its crapness, there's only so much of it I can take. Needless to say I didn't buy it!
 

LethalBargi

New member
Feb 20, 2009
132
0
0
they have new ideas they think its good they want to try it out...only to find out it was lame, and a bad idea and a loss of money... and the cycle go on
 

thedelightfulme

New member
Apr 16, 2009
194
0
0
tk1989 said:
thedelightfulme said:
Is it just me or are sequels being made for JUST ABOUT ANYTHING?
I mean Crank 2? WTF!?
Crank 1 was the meaning of awesomeness and Jason Statham is a god! Crank 2 was a much needed sequel, just like transporter 2 and 3! :p hahaha

I work in a cinema as an usher (hell yes love it two free tickets a week!)
And i am sick to death of brain dead films
The whole plot to crank 2 is SOMEONE stole his HEART. But at the end of crank he fell, a VERY long way. it doesnt matter if his heart lived, he needs a new skeleton. Jees. Its another way to expand a franchise.
Jason Statham is awesome.
Transporter should have only been one (the other were rubbish)
His best films are easily Snatch and Mean machine.
 

Ghostshot08

New member
Oct 22, 2008
29
0
0
tk1989 said:
thedelightfulme said:
Is it just me or are sequels being made for JUST ABOUT ANYTHING?
I mean Crank 2? WTF!?
Crank 1 was the meaning of awesomeness and Jason Statham is a god! Crank 2 was a much needed sequel, just like transporter 2 and 3! :p hahaha
If i remember correctly, Crank 1 set up for a sequel. I happen to be looking forward to seeing it.
 

Inverse Skies

New member
Feb 3, 2009
3,630
0
0
Welcome to the world of money spinning, where if something was moderately succesful the first time people will try to capitalise on that success with unnecessary seqeuals which are often worse than the first effort. Thats the way Hollywood works and I don't see it stopping anytime soon.
 

Jumping_Over_Fences

New member
Apr 15, 2009
976
0
0
Sequels and remakes have basically ruined my life!

With that being said, H2 is an unnecessary sequel from an unnecessary (read stupid) remake. Rob Zombie needs to be stopped! Mike Myers will not even be wearing a mask for 75% of the movie.
 

Simalacrum

Resident Juggler
Apr 17, 2008
5,204
0
0
as most people know, sequels are safer, they have an established fanbase of people who bought the previous game, and thus theres more assurance that it will sell well.
 

Flying Dagger

New member
Apr 14, 2009
1,344
0
0
how to win on escapist threads:
1. sign up.
2. watch any ZP
3. make thread quoting yahtzee verbatim
4. win.
 

Gorrister

New member
Apr 17, 2009
310
0
0
thedelightfulme said:
misterprickly said:
...snakes on a TRAIN...
Snakes on a TRAIN!? WTF!? I thought snakes on a plane was bad enough. Jees. Who that that was a good idea?!!

Snakes on a Plane was Godly. Yeah it was stupid, yeah it was badly written and yeah, the plot was about as intelligent as a brain dead duck but come on, you're missing the big picture. At the end of the day, we all got what we paid for. Snakes. On a plane. Ain't nothing better than a film that has it's plot in the title.

I must agree though, sequels are everywhere nowadays. No ones came out with a genuinely good idea for a film since Kevin Smith (aside from clerks 2).
 

irrelevantnugget

New member
Mar 25, 2008
807
0
0
thedelightfulme said:
WHY!? Why make a sequel for something that DOESNT NEED ONE?!
Capitalism.

Companies need to make profit, so they stick to what has been commonly accepted as a cultural product.
So instead of just making all kinds of products, they stick to the most popular ones, and make an entire franchise out of them, instead of trying new formulas and risking financial losses.