The Sims 4 Won't Have Pools Because its Too Much Work, Says EA

Sniper Team 4

New member
Apr 28, 2010
5,433
0
0
It seems like, "It's too much work" is becoming the new slogan for a lot of game companies. Probably not the best attitude to have.
 

bug_of_war

New member
Nov 30, 2012
887
0
0
Ultratwinkie said:
They had these features in the Sims 1, when EA wasn't as big or rich. This fad only exists because Ubisoft got away with it.
To be fair, while you're right about pools being in The Sims 1, toddlers weren't added till Sims 2. Not saying there excuse isn't bullshit, it is and they really need to just shut the fuck up and make games more than market them now.

I mean...come on EA, I defended you for so long, and now you go and do this!
 

Covarr

PS Thanks
May 29, 2009
1,559
0
0
Steven Bogos said:
He also added that pools and toddlers could be added in a post-launch patch or expansion
I'm fairly certain Rachel Franklin is a 'she' [http://www.ea.com/news/author/rachel+franklin].

That aside, it very much sounds as though the game's launch date was decided before its scope. This practice is sadly common in the AAA world, but it's still really shitty. An extra $50,000 budget and a two week delay should be easily more than enough to add these features. If it needs more than that, you've got a production pipeline problem that really needs worked out.

P.S. Thanks
 
Feb 28, 2008
689
0
0
BiH-Kira said:
Eh, who am I kidding. People will eat this shit up and EA will get away. They win again.
Unfortunately the amount of ardent, passionate fans of the series -- the kind who are up in arms about this decision -- is almost certainly vastly outweighed by ordinary users who have no idea at all about this furor and will lap it up.
 

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,316
0
0
Kungfu_Teddybear said:
It's okay, EA. I understand. I just won't be buying The Sims 4 because it's too much money for too little features.
This.

Also, everyone saying "Modders will fix it in a day" make me sad. Clearly, none of you have ever interacted with the massive fart joke that is the Sims Modding scene.
 

Glaice

New member
Mar 18, 2013
577
0
0
So, you say you're just too lazy to implement these new systems right EA? Watch you churn this out 3-6 months later as part of some expansion pack..
 

DTWolfwood

Better than Vash!
Oct 20, 2009
3,716
0
0
My god they really do think we are idiots. O wells here's hoping the game bombs.

I have no investment in this franchise so i would be a non-factor in its success or hopefully lack there of.
 

Elfgore

Your friendly local nihilist
Legacy
Dec 6, 2010
5,655
24
13
Well then, I guess The Sims 4 isn't worth an early purchase, or until it drops to twenty or thirty bucks with an expansion pack included. I've got The Sims 3 with over half the interesting expansions to keep me occupied.

They try to hide behind "too much work", but well all know why they're doing this. They gotta make their cash-cow even more fatter.
 

dragongit

New member
Feb 22, 2011
1,075
0
0
Like how SimCity couldn't have offline mode? WHOPS guess it could. And you EA... one of the biggest gaming companies in the whole damn world, you could spend 500 million on an MMO, but you can't find 10 people who can program a pool?
 

Zacharious-khan

New member
Mar 29, 2011
559
0
0
EA's production strategy is interesting. It seems to be do whatever the hell you want until release date and everything we do after that is dlc
 

zerragonoss

New member
Oct 15, 2009
333
0
0
Guys its pools and toddlers, yes they will sell them back later as that is how the sims works and always has been, but sometimes things do actually get cut to allow development to focus on things that matter. so unless these items are secretly super high demand in the sims and EA knows they have a cash cow I am giving them this one. I know your all conditioned to treat a standard PR response as bull shit but sometime they are true I mean its freaking pools and toddlers.
 

creamy5000

New member
Nov 23, 2009
29
0
0
EA should drop the 4 just like they dropped the number off of Simcity. Because you know it is going to be a broken piece of crap when it comes out. And the "New Tech" is going to get blamed for that too.
 

NuclearKangaroo

New member
Feb 7, 2014
1,919
0
0
awwww... poor itty bitty EA, it is indeed too much work for good little EA, afterall they are only the biggest fucking third party publisher around


too much work? more like, not enough day one DLC
 

chocolate pickles

New member
Apr 14, 2011
432
0
0
"The fact is, we owe you a clearer explanation for why pools and toddlers will not be in The Sims 4 at launch," executive producer Rachel Franklin wrote in a new blog post.

"It begins with the fact that we think we can make a fuck-ton more money releasing these features to you in expansion packs."

"So the bottom line is that when we sat down and looked at everything we wanted to do for this game, we realized we wanted to do the same shit we'd been doing since the first Sims game, dick on the consumer base because we can and ultimately do as little work as possible".

Fixed some of the quotes for you :)
 

Erttheking

Member
Legacy
Oct 5, 2011
10,845
1
3
Country
United States
A lot of developers apparently have decided that doing their job is just too hard nowdays haven't they?
 

Johnson McGee

New member
Nov 16, 2009
516
0
0
"The fact is, we owe you a clearer explanation for why pools and toddlers will not be in The Sims 4 at launch, [and that explanation is that we didn't finish the game in time LOL.]"
 

RedDeadFred

Illusions, Michael!
May 13, 2009
4,896
0
0
So basically: "we know that you guys really liked having these features before, but we think there'd be too much value in the game if we didn't charge you for them separately now."

Watch it be on-disk DLC. Oh I would laugh...

I've never cared about these games, but this really is bullshit. Charging for new things that have never been in the games previously is fine, but charging for something that you've had before seems ludicrous.
 

frobalt

New member
Jan 2, 2012
347
0
0
Ultratwinkie said:
frobalt said:
Ultratwinkie said:
Wow, so women AND toddlers bankrupt you if you try to render them? Golly gee, these are some scary times in video gaming where rendering anyone that isn't a white adult man suddenly makes all the money fly out of your wallet.
Please tell me you're joking and aren't actually dense enough for this to be serious?

I mean, lumping not wanting to put toddlers in with not wanting to put females in is just ridiculous.
This is the sims. Not putting in toddlers is like Activision saying guns are too hard to add to COD.

It seems now everything is "so expensive" it's getting fucking ridiculous. The sims have always had pools and toddlers. Its a basic feature.

The game is all about growing up and the progress of time. How the sims interact. Its also about making your dream house which includes a fucking pool.

The sims without a life state and without pools is like COD without guns and no multiplayer.

The fact they say "its too hard" is fucking ridiculous. They had these features in the Sims 1, when EA wasn't as big or rich. This fad only exists because Ubisoft got away with it.

How can sims 1 EA afford this, and 2014 EA can't? How can 2010 EA afford that AND MORE but 2014 EA can't?

Its ridiculous because this is ridiculous.
I agree that it's ridiculous. Hell, I wouldn't be surprised if EA charge for it as DLC.

You saying it's equivalent to not adding a playable female character to Assassins Creed is also ridiculous.