Thank you. I wanted to say something like that but I am honestly not that great with words.JohnSmith said:Ah the appalling stench of pseudo-psychology, if you are finding it hard to commit to one of these categories then look no further than the lack of proper referencing in the article that the OP took this from. There is nothing to see these categories actually reflect the different kinds of gamer merely that psychologists speculate, that they might. Also the whole article is about psychometric testing possibly the shallowest and least well supported branch of psychology aside from anything Freud said.
That just about sums me up... I spend more time thinking "just another 10 minutes of looking around [in game] and I'll go get another level..." than anything else... and that 10 minutes multiplies until I either run out of map to explore, or I stumble across a quest to finish.Surreysmith said:3. The Explorer- Games with large with plenty of new place to visit and explore such as Fallout 3 or Oblivion are the bread and butter of the Explorer.
Sounds enough like me, but I don't really fit any of these. I know I'm bad at RTS games and I've grown out of MMORPGs, but everything else is fair game. I like artsy, atmospheric games best. x3 But stupid JRPGs and Battlefield 1943 have their place in my library as well.Surreysmith said:8. The Grazer- Often casual gamers who are open minded about all genres and will happily have a go at anything.