The US army gets a new gun

[RhombusHatesYou]

No problem. However, you were right in that it is that easy to change the caliber of the weapon, at least the civilian AR counterpart, but instead of 7.62 it's to .22LR. Less accurate though, since the size difference (.223 to .22) doesn't do much to encourage amazing ballistics.

For when you absolutely need to cosplay as an Operator when potting a few rabbits.

 

[Gordon_4]

A review and a bit of firing of the actual gun.

 

[Seanchaidh]

clearly they need to go back to the 1903 springfield

 

[RhombusHatesYou]

A review and a bit of firing of the actual gun.

He got so close to some of those targets it would've been easier to just butt-stroke them.

 

[Gordon_4]

He got so close to some of those targets it would've been easier to just butt-stroke them.

You know aside from the ones that have underslung grenade launchers, I don't understand most rifles don't have at least a fold-down forward grip. It seems like a much more natural way to hold the gun and control the recoil a bit better.

 

[RhombusHatesYou]

You know aside from the ones that have underslung grenade launchers, I don't understand most rifles don't have at least a fold-down forward grip.

Way less hassle if you just have an under-barrel rail and then choose GL, fore grip, or any other toy you can convince the armourer to let you play with.

It seems like a much more natural way to hold the gun and control the recoil a bit better.

Don't go there. The argument of 'in hand' or 'on hand' (where the barrel sits relative to your off hand) is an old one that will never be concluded... mostly because any flaws on either side are responded to with the most military of answers: DO MOAR TRAINING

 

[Dirty Hipsters]

 

[Gordon_4]

Gun Jesus' take on the new rifle.

 

[The Rogue Wolf]

Gun Jesus' take on the new rifle.

Until I watched this video this morning, I didn't know that a suppressor was included in the kit. It really is an impressive bit of work.