DoPo said:
I can't think of any actually evil developers. Crazy, stupid, useless, etc - yes, but actually evil...not really. I'm struggling here, by the way. Dunno, maybe Square Enix for that "not re-releasing the Final Fantasy lots of people want" or whatever it was. I'm not really a FF player or very knowledgeable, either - I remember seeing enough people still mention this, though. Other than that I really can't think of anybody else. OK, ma-a-aybe Blizzard depending on how you interpret them. I'm not really going to call them evil, though, but it is a possibility.
squenix did rerelease FFVII on psn. They can't remake it it for reasons i, and others, have covered in many, many threads. They may be evil though, considering the sequels for many of their games recently
Someone else said valve, but they aren't evil. They are over-indulged artists.
EA doesnt develop anything that I know of (at least in the game) so they are disqualified, despite being so clearly evil
Blizzard is definitely evil, given that their entire library is made up of satanic time-vacuums. their biggest success didn't even bother including a game with the time-vacuum, just a coat of cartoon paint.
rockstar isn't evil, but is definitely staffed by lifetime inmates
naughty dog and Insomniac both had great franchises they went on to utterly ruin, then released unimpressive "adult" titles. not evil, just annoying as hell
lionhead was very clearly helmed by the Satan, whisperer of lies, and thus are the most evil. Im not calling molyneux satan, just that he was possessed. He's too bald to be satan
