I do like most of them, and one thing about this make me happy, NO MORE ZUBATS!!!! That plus I like how the type combos are finally getting interesting.
They've all been done:Tsunimo said:im excited for that fire-psychic 'Victini'
Kinda dissapointed with ANOTHER fire-fighting starter though....
I'd like to see some more range for the starter for example:
A Fire-Rock starter.
A Water-Poison starter.
A Grass-Steel starter
I know theyve been done, i never said they hadn't.Necromancer1991 said:They've all been done:Tsunimo said:im excited for that fire-psychic 'Victini'
Kinda dissapointed with ANOTHER fire-fighting starter though....
I'd like to see some more range for the starter for example:
A Fire-Rock starter.
A Water-Poison starter.
A Grass-Steel starter
Fire/Rock= Slugma/Macargo
Water/Poison= Qwilfish, Tentacool/Tentacruel
Grass/Steel= Tesshiido/Nattorei
I agree to a certain extent. Instead of making 200 new Pokemon, 90% of which will be useless, why not focus on improving some of the underused pokemon, such as Raichu, most of the Bug pokemon, or some others from Generations 1-3? Surely it'd be better design for every pokemon to at least be decent, instead of the way it is today where you have ~30-40 very powerful Pokemon like Starmie and Garchomp, and then 450 either marginal or downright bad pokemon that never see any real use.Korolev said:Now that's a lot of pokemon. Having said that, I would rather they expanded the move-set and the capabilities of existing pokemon. I know that pokemon can be considered "deep" by many players who do things like min/maxing and stat analysis and EV values and all that stuff, but instead of just making MORE pokemon, couldn't they instead focus their efforts at making the world a bit deeper?
I used to know the first 150 pokemon by heart AND in order of the handbook. DxSimalacrum said:Oh dear, I remember when I used to know all 181 Pokemon, both in Japanese AND English...
...I feel old now XD