'bout twenty seconds. Forty before the first nimrod decides to go and make fiends with them only to "become one with the sharks" in a very different way than intended.Davey Woo said:How long before people (probably tourists) start flooding to beaches where a shark has triggered the tweet just to see if they can catch a glimpse of one.
Sharks are harmless, although drop bears have knives and have a taste for human flesh.Zhukov said:#Omnomnom
...
Y'know, whenever the whole internet thing of Australian-animals-are-crazy-deadly comes up, I can never decide whether to point out that it's not true or to joke about only having been attacked twice this week.
You'd be surprised. My sister doesn't peruse Twitter but I swear she'd have a panic attack if she was away from her phone for more than an hour outside of work.SinisterGehe said:Who the hell reads their twitter on beaches? Don't you go there to swim, get a tan relax, forget the world. You can read twitter anywhere you want now days! I am sure someone will put up a 3/4G tower tall enough to cover most of outback also.
But twitter for pete sake...
I am now imagining sharks in high visibility jackets and hard hats reciting the green cross code whenever they travel across fishing vessel routes.However, shark researcher David Shiffman believes that Tweeting sharks are no substitute for proper shark safety.