Things you wish movies would stop doing

Recommended Videos

Captain Booyah

New member
Apr 19, 2010
318
0
0
Shoehorning a crappy romantic subplot into absolutely any movie, no matter how stupid it is and even if it makes no freaking sense whatsoever. Seriously, it's almost patronizing, like people can't watch any movie unless a relationship is going to come out of it. It's an unbelievably cheap device, and even worse, you can always see it coming: some hot chick strolls onto screen, or some hot guy accidentally bumps into a woman, and BAM -- cliched romance ahoy.

It's everywhere, but a good example I can think of is Guy Ritchie's Sherlock Holmes last year. There was literally no reason for Holmes to want to do the horizontal tango with Irene Adler (and vice versa) other than to cram in some romance, because oh no! The movie wouldn't have had any otherwise. That really ruined the whole thing for me.
 

diebane

New member
Apr 7, 2010
283
0
0
Scenes that repeat themselves. The only example I can think of right now is when the elves and dwarfes have an argument about who gets the ring, and Frodo looks at it a couple of times and each time the reflection of the same dwarf doing the same movements is seen.

Pretty sure I've seen this in a couple of movies, not just LOTR.

mfG diebane
 

team star pug

Senior Member
Sep 29, 2009
684
0
21
Kaboose the Moose said:
You've been reading your "cracked" haven't you.

OT: The action sequel where the main character who was likable in the first one is now feeling old, but by the end of the movie has solved his problem. In the sequels, they will never mention the "character feeling too old" story.
 

My name is Fiction

New member
Sep 27, 2010
3,207
0
0
Kaboose the Moose said:
I don't expect movies to be completely realistic. I like suspending my disbelief for the sake of something looking cool but there are some things that just make no sense. Furthermore, you find that, on top of being completely stupid, these tropes are in every single movie.

The three major ones for me:


Cocking a gun to intimidate someone

So the bad guy has his gun to someone's head, trying to get him to talk. Dude won't talk, so the bad guy cocks his gun. Oooh, dramatic

But think about it. It either means that:

1) The gun wasn't ready to fire before, thus the earlier threats had no real weight behind them, or

2) The gun was ready to fire before, thus the action is completely redundant (it's even sillier when they "pump" a shotgun to show that "shit is going to go down" because that just ejects the shell..a perfectly good shell)

So what's the point? I get that there's the intimidation factor, but come on, if the dude isn't already intimidated with a gun in his face, cocking it isn't gonna do much.

Worse than when it's being used to intimidate is when the person had every intention of firing and only waited to cock the gun at the last moment to look cool.

But even if you want to ignore how stupid it is, it's still completely played out. It seems like every movie or TV show that involves guns does it at some point. It may have been dramatic once, but its done to death.


Knocking people unconscious with a hit to the head

Do you know what happens when people get blunt force trauma to the head? The cerebral cortex can become bruised - contused, axonal injury due to stretching can occure, or in the worse case, they can die.

Oh, but not in movie world. Get hit on the head and you just take a nice little nap. Every time, because nobody ever swings hard enough to kill or soft enough to do nothing. And after you wake up, the only lingering health problem is a bit of a headache.

And again, this is something that happens all the time. Often several times in one movie.


Shooting things makes them explode

Mythbusters ruined this one for me.

It doesn't matter if you have a barrel full of gasoline. Shooting it isn't going to make it ignite. A bullet is a small piece of metal going really fast. There is no fire involved past the firing process. It won't ignite anything. Maybe, maybe, there's a slim chance that it could spark and that spark will cause ignition, but that's unlikely at best. You can't shoot something combustible and reliably expect it to explode.

For a long time I have been willing to suspend my disbelief far enough to allow for the big fiery movie explosions over realistic explosions because they're cooler to watch, but the time has come now. I cannot idly watch as commonsense takes a back seat with Hollywood action movies. If it has to be an unrealistic explosion, at least come up with better ways to deliver it.


Yes, I know it makes me a total nerd to be faffing about with trivial things like these, but I don't care. Any time I see any of these three things, it makes my left eye twitch. Oh and don't even get me started with turning every production into 3-fecking-D. Life is already in 3D, if you can't be arsed to put some realism into your explosions then don't add "realism" via 3D and have me fork out more money and spend 120mins wearing goggles that nap on the bridge of my nose.

Are/is there any similar things that you experience in movies that you have gotten irked about?
Finally some one said what HAD to be said, thats why movies suck No creativity.
 

ReservoirAngel

New member
Nov 6, 2010
3,779
0
0
Throwing in totally fucking arbitrary action sequences.

I'm looking at YOU Michael Bay! The Island is my favourite example of this. It had such an amazing idea behind it, but then got forced to drink lead paint and retard itself towards the 3rd act by the pointless inclusion of the random excessive car chase sequence when it just didn't need it all.
 

Cain_Zeros

New member
Nov 13, 2009
1,494
0
0
sgwee said:
or if you do, choose good ones. like pixar, whats up with an open season two, and a monsters inc 2, wheres my Incredibles two!
Incredibles was Dreamworks, I believe.

OT:The painfully awkward, shoehorned romance.
 

elcamino41383

New member
Mar 24, 2009
601
0
0
I'm going to have to say my first choice is 3D. I really just don't care for it. Sure I'll see a movie in 3D if its only playing in 3D, but if its in 2D and 3D at the same theater, I'll go 2D. Even though I see most my movies for free (friend is the manager of the local theater,) I still rather see 2D.

Other things I'd like to see stopped, some have been mentioned:

-Movies being made from old cartoons in the 70/80s. (Alvin and the Chipmunks, Yogi Bear, etc)

-First person/shaky camera, I don't like it in my video games, I sure as hell don't like it in my movies.

-Scenes that happen in darkness so you can't really see what is going on. I go to a movie for you to show me, not to invoke my imagination. I want to see people get their limbs severed or punched in the face, or whatever the hell is going on! Devil was the WORST with this. I shouldn't have seen the movie anyway but all the death scenes happened in TOTAL darkness.

-People not dying when they rightfully should have from being shot/stabbed/what have you. To quote Vegeta from DragonBall Z "WHY WON'T YOU DIE?!?!"
 

BNguyen

New member
Mar 10, 2009
857
0
0
not true - I believe in the hitman movie, when he walks past the kids in the room playing a video game, they're actually playing hitman blood money
 

Imperioratorex Caprae

Henchgoat Emperor
May 15, 2010
5,499
0
41
Reboots/remakes of already good movies. Friday the 13th was the only "reboot" I liked so far because it didn't trash the series previous films, just told a new story.
Ok... I'll admit I did like the reboot of Star Trek but at least they tied it into the originals, although I hate to see what will happen to Captain Picard because his facepalm is awesomesocks.
 

Nickolai77

New member
Apr 3, 2009
2,843
0
0
Zachary Amaranth said:
Nickolai77 said:
Taking cover behind car doors...bullets just go straight through. Oh, and silences- silences are not silent. If you let of a silenced pistol in a building, people in other rooms will hear it.
The main reason you take cover behind a car door is it makes you harder to hit. Anything that breaks up your form does so. People take cover behind doors in real life. You could technically take cover behind a bedsheet to similar effect, but that still doesn't mean it's pointless.
Yeah i know your right, some cover is better than no cover after all.
 

V TheSystem V

New member
Sep 11, 2009
996
0
0
GodsAndFishes said:
Ekonk said:
OBLIGATORY LOVE INTEREST.
This is one reason why I liked Inception so much...It did not have a bloody love interest!!!
It KINDA did, but it was more Joseph Gordon Levitt's character (forgot his name) kissing Ariadne just for the lolz.
 

[.redacted]

Senior Member
Jan 24, 2010
986
0
21
When all the protagonists are seriously f**cking dumb, as in "omg he's going to use that giant doomsday weapon to destroy the world". Really? Honestly? I had no idea.

Likewise for villains, e.g. when they build in a special weakpoint into every contraption they make - like the deathstar, with no real reason for it. The same thing also sort of applies when the bad guys have no reason to be evil, they just want to destroy everything - what do they get out of that?

I love how guns have no recoil, how sounds can be heard in space, how people who lift things with superpowers never sink into the ground, how love can bring people back to life, how people never check for a pulse when deciding someone is dead (they get back up afterwards), how writers never understand science, how...

Well basically this: [link]http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/DidNotDoTheResearch[/link]

Oh, and don't get me started on "good will always triumph!"...
 

_Cake_

New member
Apr 5, 2009
920
0
0
I want someone to hand a black guy a gun in a horror movie and have him ask how on earth to use it.

Also I want more fatties on screen men and women.
 

Cowabungaa

New member
Feb 10, 2008
10,804
0
0
One thing keeps annoying me above all;

The goddamn bleeping and blooping of anything technological, even normal stuff! It's ear-greating, makes 0 sense and adds nothing to the experience.
Casual Shinji said:
Milking dead cattle...

No more Alien and Predator movies, for the love of God!
Rodriguez made one a while ago which was apparently pretty good.
 

suitepee7

I can smell sausage rolls
Dec 6, 2010
1,273
0
0
Ekonk said:
OBLIGATORY LOVE INTEREST.

Anyone remember the Hitman movie? That shit was awful, mostly because of the FUCKING LOVE INTEREST. Agent 47 + love = does not compute.
this ^^

in every single film they try to incorporate a love interest, even when it doesn't even fit! you do not need a love interest in every film, it works fine without it! they can be friends, or never meet, or not like each other, it doesn't always have to be fucking love!

/rant over