Those Funny Dice

viciouspen

New member
Dec 23, 2007
135
0
0
I'm addicted to collecting dice.
Even during dry periods where I wasn't playing D&D I could never resist buying a cool looking D20, D6, D10 (which are the ones I tend to collect the most of) to add to my freaking too large collection.

I carry mine in a large Crown Royal bag and although I don't take the whole thing when I play, my "best choice" collection is still like going to the table with a bag of bricks.

I pour the whole thing out then pick which dice are "speaking" to me for that game :p

I say that comfortable in the knowledge that others have far stranger dice habits.
 

BobisOnlyBob

is Only Bob
Nov 29, 2007
657
0
0
As a heavily involved member of a my local games society, we have quite the morass of dice. We even handed out small bags of gaming dice (1d4, 1d6, 1d8, 1d10, 1d12 and 1d20) to each and every member who signed up at SocMart.

I'm amazed you all but glossed over the d10 and its strange 0-9 range (opposed faces always add up to 9, unlike most dice which add up their highest value +1), and its counterpart, the d%, with its even stranger 00-90 range. As a pair, they can generate numbers from 00 to 99 (although most people treat 00 as 100). That's used in Warhammer Fantasy, Dark Heresy, and other Games Workshop RPGs derived from their wargames (which use d6s). With many d10s, you can play White Wolf's World of Darkness tabletop game, which relies on dice pools. For each point in an attribute, skill, etc. involved in the challenge at hand, add a whole extra die. Each die showing 8, 9 or 0 after a roll counts as "one success" against the target difficulty of the roll. It's a really good system.

viciouspen said:
I say that comfortable in the knowledge that others have far stranger dice habits.
Dice habits and dice rituals are bloody amusing, provided they don't get out of hand, annoy, or interrupt the flow of the game (whether that flow is serious roleplay or "lol I kill the monster"). I have a friend who is bloody obsessed with finding and practising dice habits. Me, I just spin the dice on their points and built ascending towers. d20 at the bottom, then the d12, then the 2d10, then the d6... and then it all falls over as I place the d4.
 

Altorin

Jack of No Trades
May 16, 2008
6,976
0
0
Anacortian said:
James Maliszewski said:
Anacortian said:
Singular: Die; "Roll one die."
Plural: Dice; "Roll two dice."

On can no more roll one dice as they can eat one bananas.
The New Fowler's Modern Usage (Oxford University Press, 1996) would disagree with you: "The small cubes with faces bearing 1-6 spots used in games of chance are the dice (pl.); and one of them is also called a dice."

In point of fact, "dice" is one of those words in English that has multiple accepted singulars/plurals. There's no "right" answer, only personal preference.
I did not note the Canadian citizenship. While Oxford is the conventionally definitive body in determining True English (as spoken in England), Webster is the accepted standard for American English and disagrees both in dictionary.com and my hardcover from 2001. Siting a "modern use" guide is about as far as one can get from an official source. So far as I can tell, "dice" is only plural throughout the history of the word. Relying on "modern use" guides would also lead one to omit the comma before "and) in a list, accept "ain't" as anything but first-person singular, and allow 7331 speak and emoticons in formal writing. I maintain a firm prejudice against "modern use" guides.
you are aware that english is a living language right?

It's healthy for a living language to change over the course of time, and in fact it is inevitable.

However someone chooses to word something, that's how it's worded, as long as there is consistency for long enough, that will become tomorrows formality.

eventually, what we currently think of as "modern" will be "classical", and there'll be some new modern parlance for people to cry about.

Shakespeare was "common language" when he wrote it. It was lowbrow stuff, and he invented LOTS of words that are normal everyday words nowadays, like Eyeball. I'm sure there were plenty of cranky victorians that thought along your lines.
 

banthesun

New member
Apr 15, 2009
188
0
0
I carry my d20s around with me most of the time. There's something strangely comforting about holding them in my hands. I can also impress people by spinning them on their tips.
 

TraumaHound

New member
Jan 11, 2009
574
0
0
In my nearly 30 years of playing D&D (and other tabletop RPGs) I've bought a lot of dice. In my youth, I'd head over to the hobby shop ("High as a Kite", long-since closed down) and pick through the box of dice looking for the ones that rolled "just right". Inevitably, once used in-game, the carefully selected dice would roll poorly and let me down. I'd head back to the hobby shop and repeat the selection process. Again, and again, and again.

Now, I just buy them by the set. I've long since realized it's not the dice's fault (despite Lou Zocchi educating me http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bR2fxoNHIuU & http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PxmkWrDbn34 ) but, instead, my own inherent bad dice luck. I've had others use my dice and not have nearly the in-game failure rate that I do. I rarely offer to roll for a player as it'll most likely fail. It's me. I've taken to using a dice cup for the rolls, thinking maybe if I don't touch the dice prior to rolling maybe it'll help. So far, this has proven false. I'm thinking maybe a dice-tower (for rolling) and some ice tongs so I don't touch the dice at all. This, of course, is based on my luck being passed on by touch. If it's aura-based then I'm probably hosed since I don't know how I can roll dice from across the table.

 

Eldarion

New member
Sep 30, 2009
1,887
0
0
Anacortian said:
James Maliszewski said:
Anacortian said:
Singular: Die; "Roll one die."
Plural: Dice; "Roll two dice."

On can no more roll one dice as they can eat one bananas.
The New Fowler's Modern Usage (Oxford University Press, 1996) would disagree with you: "The small cubes with faces bearing 1-6 spots used in games of chance are the dice (pl.); and one of them is also called a dice."

In point of fact, "dice" is one of those words in English that has multiple accepted singulars/plurals. There's no "right" answer, only personal preference.
I did not note the Canadian citizenship. While Oxford is the conventionally definitive body in determining True English (as spoken in England), Webster is the accepted standard for American English and disagrees both in dictionary.com and my hardcover from 2001. Siting a "modern use" guide is about as far as one can get from an official source. So far as I can tell, "dice" is only plural throughout the history of the word. Relying on "modern use" guides would also lead one to omit the comma before "and) in a list, accept "ain't" as anything but first-person singular, and allow 7331 speak and emoticons in formal writing. I maintain a firm prejudice against "modern use" guides.
The oxford dictionary doesn't SPEAK english. Think about it.

Besides, english is a living language so any dictionary is out of date the instant its finished anyway.
 

Anacortian

New member
May 19, 2009
280
0
0
Dark Templar said:
Anacortian said:
James Maliszewski said:
Anacortian said:
Singular: Die; "Roll one die."
Plural: Dice; "Roll two dice."

On can no more roll one dice as they can eat one bananas.
The New Fowler's Modern Usage (Oxford University Press, 1996) would disagree with you: "The small cubes with faces bearing 1-6 spots used in games of chance are the dice (pl.); and one of them is also called a dice."

In point of fact, "dice" is one of those words in English that has multiple accepted singulars/plurals. There's no "right" answer, only personal preference.
I did not note the Canadian citizenship. While Oxford is the conventionally definitive body in determining True English (as spoken in England), Webster is the accepted standard for American English and disagrees both in dictionary.com and my hardcover from 2001. Siting a "modern use" guide is about as far as one can get from an official source. So far as I can tell, "dice" is only plural throughout the history of the word. Relying on "modern use" guides would also lead one to omit the comma before "and) in a list, accept "ain't" as anything but first-person singular, and allow 7331 speak and emoticons in formal writing. I maintain a firm prejudice against "modern use" guides.
The oxford dictionary doesn't SPEAK english. Think about it.

Besides, english is a living language so any dictionary is out of date the instant its finished anyway.
Yes, and one cannot see how something smells, but every language allows for it.
 

Anacortian

New member
May 19, 2009
280
0
0
Altorin said:
Anacortian said:
James Maliszewski said:
Anacortian said:
Singular: Die; "Roll one die."
Plural: Dice; "Roll two dice."

On can no more roll one dice as they can eat one bananas.
The New Fowler's Modern Usage (Oxford University Press, 1996) would disagree with you: "The small cubes with faces bearing 1-6 spots used in games of chance are the dice (pl.); and one of them is also called a dice."

In point of fact, "dice" is one of those words in English that has multiple accepted singulars/plurals. There's no "right" answer, only personal preference.
I did not note the Canadian citizenship. While Oxford is the conventionally definitive body in determining True English (as spoken in England), Webster is the accepted standard for American English and disagrees both in dictionary.com and my hardcover from 2001. Siting a "modern use" guide is about as far as one can get from an official source. So far as I can tell, "dice" is only plural throughout the history of the word. Relying on "modern use" guides would also lead one to omit the comma before "and) in a list, accept "ain't" as anything but first-person singular, and allow 7331 speak and emoticons in formal writing. I maintain a firm prejudice against "modern use" guides.
you are aware that english is a living language right?

It's healthy for a living language to change over the course of time, and in fact it is inevitable.

However someone chooses to word something, that's how it's worded, as long as there is consistency for long enough, that will become tomorrows formality.

eventually, what we currently think of as "modern" will be "classical", and there'll be some new modern parlance for people to cry about.

Shakespeare was "common language" when he wrote it. It was lowbrow stuff, and he invented LOTS of words that are normal everyday words nowadays, like Eyeball. I'm sure there were plenty of cranky victorians that thought along your lines.
lolz ur rite. willy spear didnt uber work 2 phit his prose n2 acsepted modes. lowbrow funnys = lobo language & workg makeuping wwords ?en none xsist w/ needed valu s = 2 iust ritingoff conventon. yay, i c it now. u rockxor & pwnd my newbass roflmao. poetry s no diff then witetrash rantg. uve opend me is, tyvm.
 

Deacon Cole

New member
Jan 10, 2009
1,365
0
0
Country
USA
Interesting. I had been told (and cannot verify the accuracy of this) that various "dice" were used in wargaming circles that were not the standard six-sided dice. These were pieces of cardboard that were cut into regular shapes with the number of sides equal to the range you wanted to generate a random number, which were numbered. A thin dowel was fixed through the center of the cardboard and the entire device was spin like a top, coming to rest on the resulting number.

I have seen such an item in the Parker Brothers board game Ruffhouse [http://www.boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/4117/ruffhouse], but I do not know if such things were ever used in wargaming and were the reason why Wesley or Arneson or anyone involved with RPGs would have thought to use dice with sides other than six. It seems strange if they were upon reflection as early D&D boxed sets came with "chit" sheets that were numbered tiles to be cut apart and drawn randomly from a bag or hat. This seems like it would be a more likely randomizer-of-choice for low-budget wargames.
 

Hulyen

New member
Apr 20, 2009
237
0
0
I have a board game that came with a D8 called "Key to the Kingdom." I've had it for quite some time now, actually - it plays sort of like a D&D Light. I tabletop rp on and off as I find people to play with, but I can't resist the lure of the dice jar at my local game store. So fun to dig through!
 

TraumaHound

New member
Jan 11, 2009
574
0
0
Hulyen said:
I have a board game that came with a D8 called "Key to the Kingdom." I've had it for quite some time now, actually - it plays sort of like a D&D Light.
Wow, never heard of Key to the Kingdom [http://www.boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/1933/key-to-the-kingdom]; looks pretty cool...I'll have to hit up eBay for a copy. Trying to get my kids into non-videogames (I know, weird) when I can. Now if only I could pick up a copy of TSR's Dungeon [http://www.boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/1339/dungeon] boardgame. This was my kinda D&D boardgame when I was a kid.
 

Christopher B

New member
Sep 9, 2009
32
0
0
TraumaHound said:
Hulyen said:
I have a board game that came with a D8 called "Key to the Kingdom." I've had it for quite some time now, actually - it plays sort of like a D&D Light.
Wow, never heard of Key to the Kingdom [http://www.boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/1933/key-to-the-kingdom]; looks pretty cool...I'll have to hit up eBay for a copy. Trying to get my kids into non-videogames (I know, weird) when I can. Now if only I could pick up a copy of TSR's Dungeon [http://www.boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/1339/dungeon] boardgame. This was my kinda D&D boardgame when I was a kid.
Aaaggghh - beware: although fairly straight-forward and fun, the rules to Key to the Kingdom are a bit broken. If your fellow players discover the game's flaw (and it's not house-ruled away) you could find yourself in a game that goes on for hours! (I know I did.)
 

WhiteCottonPaper

New member
Sep 3, 2009
6
0
0
The tactile sensation of dice rolling is something I enjoy as well, and I definitely do have favourite dice. As for dice habits, one of my favourite to watch is a mate of mine practices a dice shaming circle when he gets a particularly bad dice. He gets all of his dice puts them in a circle with their maximum number showing and then puts the shamed die in the middle showing a one. He never lets this rare practice interupt the flow of the game though.

As for my habits my main one concerns Shadowrun (4th ed) which uses alot of d6's, I use Games Workshop dice due to their small size and the large dice pools. I bought two 30 packs, which at the time contained 20 red & 10 black, so I could have 15 red & 15 black. As a once off I did a roll off to find the top 15 of each colour, and I now take the chosen 30 to each session in a GW dice tin. Once I'm there I do a roll off (5 dice of the same colour at a time) to find the top 9 of each colour (my main combat pool is 18) with dice showing 1's automatically relgated and dice showing 5 or 6 promoted. I find this tends to work fairly effectively, and luck has been with me consistantly over the extended peroid of the life of the game.

One of my pet hates concerning gamers are those who use dice that are not easily readable from across the table. Recently my shadowrun group, I'm a pc, told an offending player the new group standard was to use gw dice with the 2's, 3's & 4's blacked out with a black or red sharpie and that no other dice would be accepted, except for the gm. I have required fellow players to put aside dice which were a bit too lucky, some players can be trusted to just be having a good day and some can't.

As for dice containers; my GW dice are in a GW dice tin, my WOD Promethean dice for Vampire are kept in a tin that looks like a original NES controller and for D&D and other games I keep them in a Chivas Regal (21yo) Royal Salute bag, with excess dice staying in cardboard tube on my rpg bookshelf.