SNIP
Well, there's actually lots of diversity in here. Not like the U.S, but still. We also have white 'uns and redheads in here. But yes, actual native ?Indians? are many, and account for a large part of the population, but as you probably discerned yourself, they got the lower end of the stick since ?the conquest.? Not only did they lose their lands, but also their religion and even their names, which is why my makeup is mostly a mixture (I tend to lean more to the white side), my name is still Alejandro, a greek name brought over from Spain, and my last name is Spanish-Arab rooted, again brought again from Spain (there were Arabs in Spain, you know), and STILL, there's indigenous in me, but what that's called, who knows. And that's just me; you go around and find Jimenez(son of Jaime), Rodriguez(son of Rodrigo), Sanchez(son of Sancho), etc. etc. There's still tons of them natives with their own names, but they're looked down upon. Can you believe that? They were here first and now have to stand at the back of the line.
Right now, even though nobody acknowledges it, exists a very deep rooted racism agains the native population, going so far as to call someone ?Indio? equates to calling someone a moron, even while they are the most disadvantaged of ALL the populations in México. Sucks, huh?
An indigenous resident can constitutionally run for president, that's for sure, but they're probably not even gonna be taken seriously by the money movers. Last election we had this: ?white guy vs white guy vs brown guy,? and people literally pointed at ?brown guy? and said disdainfully ?parece indio!?, which roughly translates to ?looks like an indian!.? Mind you, the shit hit the fan and, now, it depends on who you ask in here, but for my money, ?brown guy? did win and they pulled a total crapjob and stole the election. There were even math doctors that started checking the numbers that the committee put out and noted some friggin' gnarly irregularities in the numbers of the guy who ?won.?
Now, ?brown guy,? wasn't even a full blooded native but that actually tells you something.
Kinda what I suspected. I hate to get into racially based politics, but sometimes idealism has to give way to reality. And our own native peoples were pretty much decimated or worse, and are still typically living in utter poverty except those who have given up the reservation and assimilated - so it could be worse.
Those self-deporting Mexicans are in the minorities, trust me.
Yes, definitely a small minority, but that any are deporting themselves shows that enforcement can work to a degree and that not all of our immigrants are completely unskilled. An unskilled Mexican (Honduran, etc.) has no reason to return - he's got nothing better waiting for him - but if he's learned a marketable skill and has a bit of a stake saved up then he might do well in his home country. Also, many illegals say they don't want to be Americans - they just need work. Once they earn enough to set up a restaurant, taco stand, construction business, or whatever they'd really like to do, they can return home and not live in abject poverty. Those will always be less than the new immigrants' numbers, true, but if corruption doesn't cheat them out of their money then they've built up a bit of Mexico's economy. The only way in the long run to stem the flow of illegals is for other nations to establish a measure of prosperity and opportunity for the lowest to drag themselves up. Sadly it doesn't seem like the Mexican government has any interest in doing that, but I'd like to think that a grass roots economy funded with the money earned in and sent back from the USA could bring Mexico's poor a better standard of living. In other words, I'd like to think the money sent back is raising Mexico toward the USA's level of prosperity rather than just pulling the USA down. My fear is that those in power in the USA like Mexico's model better - a small but ultra wealthy ruling caste, a fairly small but essential middle class, and a very large and very poor underclass.
Yeah, it can. That is the case with my aunt went she went there to the U.S. She got there, she got work, she learned the language and is now a legal citizen; votes, speaks good english, skips jury duty, gets pissed when people refuse to learn the language,etc. But still, she's not assimilated at all, and still considers herself Mexican and an U.S citizen.
The real problem with México is that corruption starts from ?up there,? not ?down here.? The money that filters back into our economy can't be applied in industry or whatnot because it's spending base are mostly people with low education, and from there it filters elsewhere, it can't gain any kind of purposeful momentum anywhere; it's just there, circling around.
Money made in the U.S can for sure help, but only if it is managed correctly, and we don't have that 'cuz, again, our government is run by overpriced, overzealous ?business men? morons.
Well, there's assimilating and there's assimilating. I don't like a person to become a citizen but still give Mexico (or wherever) his first allegiance. That divides and weakens the country, and has been the problem with the Mexican flag-waving protests. But there's nothing wrong with a Mexican becoming an American citizen but still preferring Mexican culture, Mexican women, speaking Spanish, etc. just as long as the group isn't insular. In other words, there shouldn't be a problem with your brother marrying a white or black girl even if you yourself prefer Latin. America has traditionally been a melting pot - it's our biggest strength - and as Limos put it so well, if a group doesn't assimilate we're not real happy with it.
And I don't think anyone should be taught in another language - children should be transitioned to English as quickly as possible. Otherwise they are limited in opportunity, and the group stays insular. Separate language groups are almost always a problem - look at Georgia and South Ossetia, Canada and Quebec, Mexico and Chiapas for that matter. People who don't speak the same language historically have problems feeling they are one people.
Oh, and Alejandro is one of the coolest names ever. Those Greeks have such lyrical names.
Good talking with you.
And Pedro, there are dangerous places in the US too. Mexico's are larger, but that's largely because the drug cartels are fueled with money from American drug users.