Thread Topic - LGBT and Video Games

the spaciest

New member
Jul 20, 2011
14
0
0
I think it's absolutely fine for a videogame to include a character of any gender/race/species/sexual-orientation that the developers care to include. But that's probably where my proactive attitude towards the issue of LGBT begins and ends. My concern is when things like this virtually (if not literally) become a mandated necessity.

Take the BBC's recent move where they enacted a policy change based on feminist lobbying. Now the producers of panel shows are contractually obliged to include women on the panel (shows such as QI, Mock the Week etc) And I genuinely don't believe that's helping anyone - in fact it simply serves to make the women who now appear on said shows, look like they are there because of a mandate and not on their own merits (which they may well have been chosen for) And what's really so wrong about an occasionally all male panel on a TV show? Are they worried they might somehow fuse into some kind of hyper-masculine Voltron and destroy the world with a man boner? I genuinely don't get it.

To veer vaguely back onto topic, another broadcasting example would be the pressure (in the UK at least) to represent homosexual characters on TV. I'm not against that at all and I see that there are clearly some benefits in seeking to do so. Familiarization through entertainment media could very-well lead to a more accepting society. But on the other hand it could also result in hard liners and fence sitters, feeling like they're surrounded by a group that they fear/loathe (I don't know what those weirdos think) when that couldn't be further from the truth.

The Office of National Statistics in the UK estimates that a mere 1.5% of the population are homosexual, but compare that to the representation of homosexuals in the media and you have a striking statistical misrepresentation.

Now remember, I'm not against that per se; I see the potential efficacy of acclimatising a bigoted and conservative people, through entertainment media - but there is a risk of a disproportional response to a disproportional representation.

That said, we are nowhere near such a disproportional representation of LGBT characters in videogames, so most likely it couldn't hurt. I'm just keen for creative freedoms to remain free from lobbying. In fact instead of lobbying, such groups would probably be better served by producing a videogame that includes LGBT characters.

As a side note I generally find myself disinclined to dwell on sex and sexuality at all. Yeah, sure it's a thing, I get it. If I rub my peepee in a certain way it feels a bit nice. Sure my socio-biological programming makes me go "ooh those round lumps of flesh look captivating" but doesn't it just seem like we dwell far too much on the nature of sex and sexuality in general?

I think about how much collective energy is wasted in the pursuit of sex, the championing of sex, the demonisation of sex the sexexexexexeexe *YAWN*

Maybe if we didn't obsess so much about gender and sexuality, those things would just happen anyway and the collective unconscious could breathe a sigh of fracking relief - not orgasmic relief mind you - just bog standard relief.

Nor am I certain that I need to be represented in any medium I choose to spend my time consuming. I'm a hetero male, but I don't feel alienated if I read a book about a woman who maybe even happens to be a lesbian (or not). I don't identify with the gender or sexuality of the character - I identify with their story, their various motivations, their plight and their humanity (or in the case of aliens - their in/un-humanity)

I realise my response is a mess, and I also freely acknowledge that others most likely feel much more personally invested or impassioned by the subject of orientation representation. It's difficult for me to know where I'd stand if I was considered a minority and happened to have a sex-drive that was anything other than permanently stuck in low ratio - but I am what I am, y' know?
 

Alvin Joseph

New member
Oct 21, 2014
15
0
0
Johnny Novgorod said:
A game can't be "gay". It's a thing.
yeah! i agree with you. as we look to the definition from the merriam webster dictionary. gay means bright, or lively.

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/gay
 

Fishyash

Elite Member
Dec 27, 2010
1,154
0
41
I don't really care either way. The only thing that matters to me is that the team wants the character to be straight or LGBT...

In the end, that's going to be how it plays out. These types of games are going to be a minority because most developers don't want to make gay characters, without some inspiring reasons behind it. In Japan, outside of yaoi games, anything related to homosexuality in Japan is usually done for laughs, the only exception I can think of is Kanji from Persona 4 (and even then there's a comedic side to it).

In the west, it's generally treated as a very minor thing. The only AAA developer that makes a big deal out of it is BioWare. And I'm perfectly fine about all of this: if more developers end up making gay characters when they want to, so be it. If I never saw a gay character again, that's fine too.

The only thing that will be a problem is if they ended up giving characters the sexuality they didn't really want to give them. There are more than enough devs that have integrity though, so I'm not too worried about that.
 

nightmare_gorilla

New member
Jan 22, 2008
461
0
0
grassgremlin said:
**Edit:I'm aware this thread is me rambling just so I can talk about something other then #gamergate and feminism. As such thread topic is anything to do with LGBT and video games.

Original Text

Instead of the usual threads I make, I'm going to get personal about some things.

I'm homosexual if it isn't obvious. I'm a boy who likes boys.
I've gone further then that, I also like drag too, but I never done it myself yet. I can't quite afford the clothes.

I think I love this industry right now. What's being done right now and the diversity that is taking shape. Yes, this is a thread being positive about the idea of more gender-fluid games and LGBT representation.

I wanted this. No, I needed this. People may often seem me run about this thread, defending this and that about gamers who just don't care about these issues, but in all reality, I actually do care.

In fact, I never cared before until this actually became a thing. At first, I never thought about gay or trans characters in video games, but when they've started to pop up, there is . . . a certain feeling.

Please don't tell me I'm the only one. You don't care because you're playing games and having fun, but when you're allowed the option, when I can be a girly boy transvestite or a black guy who doesn't look like Balrog or Barrett in a game, well . . . giddy does not begin to describe the feeling.

For the first time ever, I can make comics without the worries about things like "will I have a audience?" I can say, I'll make something really gay and have no fear.

Recently I spent all the time defending straight person's interest. After all if I want to have my fuck toys they can have theirs right. But, I'm taking up the task of trying on the gay defense for a change.

I want to reinforce that despite what I always say, I really do care about inclusive or diversity. I didn't even think about the zombie fighting in sunset overdrive. As soon as I read that the character customization was gender-fluid, I was all ears. I played guilty gear for Bridget. I prefer the king of fighter games with Ash Crimson.

Does it matter if it makes sense in context? Honestly, I don't care. Truthfully, pandering and shoehorning doesn't bother me like most unless it's introduced subtlety. I usually only cringe when it's jarring.

Gay games for me is 100% approval rating. I want more. I want no punches pulled. I'm very sex positive too. Call it niche' all you want but I want my gay DOA. If it makes straight guys uncomfortable, go play elsewhere.

What do you guys think?

Let's be selfish about what we really want.
I've said it before, I want everyone to get their dream game eventually.

I am a straight whiteish (italian) guy so i can't say I relate quite exactly but i can understand the frustration. I mean this is my anthill to your mountain but you would not believe how hard it can be to find a decent hairstyle in character customization that looks anything like mine. i know how bad that sounds to compare the two, as i said anthill to mountain. but it's the same kind of thing you want to take ownership of your character like any gamer, as i said i want that for you as much as anyone. i want the right to NOT be interested if i think your dream game would bore me but shit gaming is HUGE there's enough room for everyone to have a perfect game for them not just a perfect reviewed game. i think everyone who plays games has an idea for a game they'd love to play in their head i want everyone to have that game made real i can't imagine any reason why you shouldn't get that.

But specifically as far as LGBT characters go in games it might be interesting to play as one. I have to phrase this exactly right, but simply put I don't understand the transgender desire. I don't mean it doesn't make sense or that it's wrong I mean I personally have no frame of reference mentally for what a person must go through to feel the need to change genders. I know it must be hellish to take those drastic steps and I have nothing but love and empathy for anyone going through that. However, I've always been comfortable in my own skin, I wouldn't trade being me for anything, i'd rather be me than the guy who's married to halle berry or insert smoking hot female celebrity here. I love being me. so when I say i don't understand it I mean just that on an intellectual level I don't truly get what could drive someone to think that way. Games as a medium have a great power of offering us new perspectives on things even normal things we've seen a million times before can be seen through new eyes when we're immersed in a game session. so doing the "walk a mile in my shoes thing" with a Trans person through a game is something that would interest me. I don't see any reason why a gay guy couldn't save his boyfriend instead of the princess or still save the princess only to give us a big "whomp whomp." when she tries to "reward" him. hell that might be the best policy of all. make the most tough as nails bad ass you can think of, let us play the whole game as him being a total boss then at the end reveal he's into dudes, it might come off as a gag but there is this kind of stereotype that gay guys can't be tough so seeing him do the usual action hero kind of stuff like digging a bullet out of his leg or some other tough guy clice' you might find a whole lot of dude-guy-bros rooting for a gay guy without realizing it. as it is now I think most gay characters show up in japanese games to sneeze glitter and be super gay all over the place and play to the stereo type. the only issue with lesbian characters is you invite alot of porno comparisons where guys are gonna basically stand around waiting for the two chicks to get it on. not that there's anything wrong with that but i don't think the "porn lesbian" is a good representation of real lesbians but then again i don't really know. never met a real lesbian.
 

NemotheElvenPanda

New member
Aug 29, 2012
152
0
0
If and when there are more gay characters and stories in video games, I'd love it if they'd avoid cliché teenage coming-out stories or dealing with HIV/AIDs like how it is in most LBGT media already. It be nice to just have a story where there's just someone that's gay and owns it in a relationship or whatever without all the angst. It should be interesting and engaging like every other example of sexuality in games, best example being the Witcher. When Geralt isn't sleeping around, on the long term he is trying to get Triss back somehow, someway, and that does tie into his sexuality since the two are in an on-on-off relationship. Just make the prostitutes and lovers male and Triss into a Travis and it would still be the same thing, possibly with some of that gritty bigotry the Witcher World is famous for, and it would still be the of the same quality. People forget on how much sexuality factors into stories and characterization, so it's 100% possible to do the same with LGBT ones and still have it fun and interesting.
 

Jesterscup

New member
Sep 9, 2014
267
0
0
grassgremlin said:
Please don't tell me I'm the only one. You don't care because you're playing games and having fun, but when you're allowed the option, when I can be a girly boy transvestite or a black guy who doesn't look like Balrog or Barrett in a game, well . . . giddy does not begin to describe the feeling.
I stand with you! You are not alone.
 

Lightknight

Mugwamp Supreme
Nov 26, 2008
4,860
0
0
Musette said:
Lightknight said:
It's funny but I find the pantsuit to be really attractive and fashionable when done right. So I don't get why people would judge others on those lines. But then again, I don't understand why people would judge others on clothing choices in general rather than maybe the lack thereof?
Yeah, a lot of pantsuits still look plenty feminine, and suits in general are pretty universally awesome if you ask me! (I will admit that finding a good women's suit jacket is a struggle though, especially because I have broad shoulders, but an otherwise small build. It's almost embarrassing how long it took for me to try on a men's suit jacket in my size and discover just how much better of a fit they were.) Maybe in certain situations, I can rationalize why someone might judge someone else's attire, but I still don't understand the obsession with that sort of judgement.
Broad shoulders, I understand that completely and it also makes dresses particularly hard to find if my wife is any indication (she's a similar build, wide shoulders with otherwise typical feminine build).

I can't say I really give much weight to the views of my peers about how I dress, (wearing clothing that other people pressure me to wear just feels dishonest for some reason,) so that's not really an issue for me. I'm still pretty financially dependent on my family, (I'm a university student close to finishing my first of four degrees that I'm working toward, not to mention that my family's very tight-knit, to the point where I hear from them multiple times each day,) which would mean I'd have to explain/justify the purchase one way or another. I'm just waiting for more opportune timing I suppose.
It's nice that you have a close knit family. FYI, good jeans don't have to be $40+. I'm sure you're aware of other stores but just in case you aren't (I only became aware of these places within the last five years), I'd recommend checking out:

Marshall's (Same as TJ Maxx but with more male clothing) for steep discounts on name brands. I buy shoes exclusively there now as you can get $60-80 shoes for $25-40.

Costco (if you have friends or families with a membership, their jeans are great material for $15 in my area, just remember that they only take cash or debit at the register and not credit).

But I certainly recall being financially tied to my family back in college so I understand if even good deals aren't enough. Had a rough patch where selling plasma was the only thing that got me through my bills at one particularly low point of college. It's still weird to have come from that and be in a two income household with my wife and owning two homes. What a tremendous shift in conditions in less than a decade?!

I definitely agree with your sentiments about whose opinions are worth valuing! It actually is almost funny how strongly some people react to that topic. Fortunately, the people that matter most don't give me crap, and I feel like that's how it should be. Admittedly, I'm a little nervous that I might get judged for not wearing a dress for a specific event that's coming up (I'm going to be featured as a soloist with the university orchestra behind me early next year, performing one of my favorite concertos), but my family offered to rent me a white tuxedo for that night, so hopefully, that will be formal enough. (And otherwise, I suppose I should just do what I normally do and value my opinion on my attire above that of strangers and peers.)
You have enough to worry about without concern for how people will view your clothing choices. At the end of the day though, nobody remembers what the artist was wearing when they're staring at the art being made.

I think that there is this air of permanence that makes some people react strongly to the term asexual in particular. I think the term is interpreted as saying "I've never been attracted to anyone, and I never will!" and I think that's what creates the strong reaction. Some people think it's like you're making some permanent decision about yourself and not just describing yourself with a term that accurately contextualizes your feelings and experiences. (Hence why the tired "you just haven't met the right person" argument comes up almost inevitably.) I think that some people are also weary of excessive labeling, which attached a kind of stigma to any orientation other than gay, straight, and maybe bi.
Hmm, that does make sense. It's weird how you can say the same thing twice, that you're not interested in relationships at all with anyone vs. you're asexual gets met with completely different results.

It's actually kinda funny how split the conservative crowd seems to be about asexuality. On one hand, the argument you mention about Paul is often cited as a reason to accept sexuality, and have read cases where churches accept their asexual members. (Some hypothesize that some religious asexuals may have found their place among the clergy throughout history, which sounds logical enough.) Yet, on the other hand, I have heard of churches being unwelcome to asexuals for reasons such as "rejecting god's gift of sexuality" and ignoring the "be fruitful and multiply" thing (even though sexual orientation doesn't exactly determine if you want kids or not).
Theology is a heck of a thing, I suppose. Sarcasm: How dare you reject a gift you didn't get! Interestingly enough, I happen to be a very studied expert on the matter of theology and even apologetics. If it has ology or ism in it then I'm usually a good one for a conversation on it. I just find what people believe and why they believe it to be an amazingly fascinating subject to study. Specialized in monotheistic religions with a side interest in Tibetan practices in my University days.

Just a random fact about me on the topic. Let me know if you ever have any random questions and I can likely give you a few different perspectives and explanations I've come across. I prefer to take the outsider perspective on those sorts of things when I explain beliefs so the person can come to their own conclusion without me. Hard to do at times but I think it's worth the effort. I was raised Christian but I'm not an ass about it, if that distinction makes sense. I'm more of the guy that expresses faith by building orphanages and working in soup kitchens than the type that shakes his head with brow furrowed in consternation at people. Frankly, I find the latter types to be shameful and overshadowing the former types that bring actual value to communities. I'm also a full believer in science and evolution (not as contradictory as one might think when viewing how we create digital universes with their own rules all the time which will inevitably get more and more complex as our technology improves). So... I guess I know what it feels like to be an outlier in my own community in a sense. Nothing to your degree though, of course. But I just wanted to include my background so that you'd know you're speaking with someone who is absolutely passionate about the subject of religions but isn't so much as batting an eye at your orientation aside from being interested in how it impacts you and what sort of struggles you face. Thought maybe that might encourage you a little and was worth exposing myself a bit more than normal in case it would. I consider the general view of Christianity to be negative on the internet. Like it automatically places me in some kind of bigoted or ignorant category. So I like to avoid bringing it up. Sorry if doing so has had any kind of unintended consequences in your opinion of me and this conversation though. I very much understand why people would have certain prejudices against people who are commonly seen having prejudices. Thankfully we're a 2 billion person group so I can absolutely claim distinctness from the more asshatty elements of the group.

I apologize for some of my typos/unclear writing in that quoted paragraph especially. I meant to say that I'm basically in the minority because I am not romantically inclined. The common terminology for this is Romantic Orientation, which describes what gender you are more inclined to fall in love with, nebulous as that is. (For example, I would count as "aromantic" as opposed to heteroromantic, biromantic, etc. I avoid using these terms offline even more than I avoid using the word "asexual" because of the excessive labeling knee-jerk reactions.) A person has "mismatched orientations" when their romantic and sexual orientations differ, as they can theoretically occur in any combination. Based on most of the surveys I've seen, most asexuals have mismatched orientations, meaning that they do fall in romantic love, which makes their relationship with asexuality very different from my own.
Thanks for the clarification and the new terminology. I appreciate the education.

As I alluded to above, there's a pretty significant chunk of the asexual community that does desire/engage in romantic relationships. Mixed relationships are more common than asexual/asexual relationships, so there's never a shortage of people venting about their partner or looking for advice on the topic. Most of the asexual visibility I've seen primarily focuses on asexuals who pursue romantic relationships, probably because romance is often associated with sex one way or another.
When pursuing romantic relationships, is there usually a commonly expressed gender preference or are asexuals more likely to fall into a bisexual category as far as desired romantic pairing?
 

Musette

Pacifist Percussionist
Apr 19, 2010
278
0
0
Lightknight said:
Broad shoulders, I understand that completely and it also makes dresses particularly hard to find if my wife is any indication (she's a similar build, wide shoulders with otherwise typical feminine build).
Yeah, it's amazing how broad shoulders can complicate finding clothing that fit properly. From the times that I have worn dresses, I know full well how hard it is to find a dress that flatters broad shoulders (strapless dresses especially). I love my broad shoulders, but the women's fashion industry doesn't seem to!

It's nice that you have a close knit family. FYI, good jeans don't have to be $40+. I'm sure you're aware of other stores but just in case you aren't (I only became aware of these places within the last five years), I'd recommend checking out:

Marshall's (Same as TJ Maxx but with more male clothing) for steep discounts on name brands. I buy shoes exclusively there now as you can get $60-80 shoes for $25-40.

Costco (if you have friends or families with a membership, their jeans are great material for $15 in my area, just remember that they only take cash or debit at the register and not credit).

But I certainly recall being financially tied to my family back in college so I understand if even good deals aren't enough. Had a rough patch where selling plasma was the only thing that got me through my bills at one particularly low point of college. It's still weird to have come from that and be in a two income household with my wife and owning two homes. What a tremendous shift in conditions in less than a decade?!
Thanks! I certainly try not to take my family for granted. I'm actually familiar with all the stores you've mentioned. (In fact, I have a bunch of fantastic formal collared shirts from Costco that were quite reasonable.) Strangely though, I don't remember the last time I've bought pants from any of those places. I will certainly keep that in mind next time I go searching for pants!

(I'm actually not fully certain of my family's financial situation because of a ton of factors that I wouldn't feel right delving into, but my family always tried to ensure that I wouldn't have to worry about money while working on my education, so I wouldn't feel right claiming our experiences as comparable. I guess I have more of a guilt factor considering that I'm 21 and haven't paid my way at all. I'm hoping that I will land a graduate assistantship for next year though, so I can cover my own tuition at least.)

(I'm also kinda putting up my own unnecessary barriers by not wanting to explain why I would specifically want men's pants yet also not wanting to just purchase them with some of my own money and appear as if I was trying to hide information since my family is so transparent/honest with each other. It's a pretty ridiculous reason, especially with such an accepting family, yet it's probably my biggest block.)

Success stories like what you've shared are always nice to hear! (In fact, one of my parents grew up in pretty extreme poverty and had a similar drastic shift for the better.) It's amazing how much things seem to change for the betters or you in 10 years time! Would you say it was mostly gradual, or did certain events sort of punctuate the change (such as going to a two-income household), if you don't mind my asking?

You have enough to worry about without concern for how people will view your clothing choices. At the end of the day though, nobody remembers what the artist was wearing when they're staring at the art being made.
Good point! No need to get too worked up over it, and I never let others' expectations affect how I dressed for my performances before, so why start now?

Hmm, that does make sense. It's weird how you can say the same thing twice, that you're not interested in relationships at all with anyone vs. you're asexual gets met with completely different results.
Yeah, it's rather bizarre how much semantics gets thrown into the equation, but I suppose there's also the element of declaring yourself as something other than straight factoring in. (Hence the "it's just a phase" accusations that pop up a fair amount for the LGBT+ crowd.)

Theology is a heck of a thing, I suppose. Sarcasm: How dare you reject a gift you didn't get! Interestingly enough, I happen to be a very studied expert on the matter of theology and even apologetics. If it has ology or ism in it then I'm usually a good one for a conversation on it. I just find what people believe and why they believe it to be an amazingly fascinating subject to study. Specialized in monotheistic religions with a side interest in Tibetan practices in my University days.
I'm sure there's a degree of confirmation bias that factors in when people use religious texts to back their arguments. (Same as anything else really, and as an outsider looking in, I certainly still have my own biases that help shape my opinion on the matter.)

Just a random fact about me on the topic. Let me know if you ever have any random questions and I can likely give you a few different perspectives and explanations I've come across. I prefer to take the outsider perspective on those sorts of things when I explain beliefs so the person can come to their own conclusion without me. Hard to do at times but I think it's worth the effort. I was raised Christian but I'm not an ass about it, if that distinction makes sense. I'm more of the guy that expresses faith by building orphanages and working in soup kitchens than the type that shakes his head with brow furrowed in consternation at people. Frankly, I find the latter types to be shameful and overshadowing the former types that bring actual value to communities. I'm also a full believer in science and evolution (not as contradictory as one might think when viewing how we create digital universes with their own rules all the time which will inevitably get more and more complex as our technology improves). So... I guess I know what it feels like to be an outlier in my own community in a sense. Nothing to your degree though, of course. But I just wanted to include my background so that you'd know you're speaking with someone who is absolutely passionate about the subject of religions but isn't so much as batting an eye at your orientation aside from being interested in how it impacts you and what sort of struggles you face. Thought maybe that might encourage you a little and was worth exposing myself a bit more than normal in case it would. I consider the general view of Christianity to be negative on the internet. Like it automatically places me in some kind of bigoted or ignorant category. So I like to avoid bringing it up. Sorry if doing so has had any kind of unintended consequences in your opinion of me and this conversation though. I very much understand why people would have certain prejudices against people who are commonly seen having prejudices. Thankfully we're a 2 billion person group so I can absolutely claim distinctness from the more asshatty elements of the group.
Your background on the topic is absolutely fascinating! On a personal spiritual level, I've probably always been essentially apathetic to religion. (I actually couldn't tell you what my religious beliefs were as a child because I don't remember ever having any profound thoughts on the topic.) Still, the ethnomusicologist in me really sparked an interest in the topic because of the major role religion plays in shaping a culture, and the role music plays within many religions. (I remember reading about the Bira Ceremonies within Shona culture and being absolutely captivated by it.) Even the early history of Western music fascinates me in a similar way, as a lens into a culture removed from my own. (Regardless of my own religious apathy, I love a lot of music associated with religions from all over the world, and Gregorian Chant is no exception.)

I will certainly say that I have a lot of respect for your relationship with your faith! It's amazing how much anti-theist sentiments (as well as extreme religious ones) have shaped this sort of polarizing "you either believe in God or science, not both" stance that is so widespread. Even though some of the more judgmental/aggressive Christians I've interacted with gave me a bit of a bad taste in my mouth, (my university has some very active religious organizations and back when I was naive enough to be honest about my agnosticism when asked, I got more than my fair share of "oh, you're just confused; reading the bible should fix that" as well as "technically, you're going to hell" thrown at me,) I know better than to blame the faith rather than the individuals. My percussion professor, who happens to be the best educator I've ever had the pleasure of learning under, happens to be fairly religious (he took a musician mission trip to Kenya last year and plays regularly for his church, so I presume he's religious anyways,) and I couldn't imagine writing him (or anyone) off because of religion. There's no need to apologize for your religious views or fear that I'd think less of you for it.

Actually, I wouldn't treat one potential form of isolation from your peers as inherently better or worse than the other. I have moments where I really notice just how different I am from my peers, but it's more of the combination of multiple factors than me focusing on one aspect of myself. (I actually tend to feel especially isolated among more traditionally feminine non-musician women in particular because percussion is a niche predominantly masculine field, as is music composition, and my interest in video games as art as well as the industry itself doesn't help much either. Asexuality just tends to be the icing on the cake for me.) It's very frustrating when you can't find someone whose philosophies are similar to your own, especially in groups congregated over a common identity like religious belief, and I'm not surprised that could isolate you from your peers.

Thanks for the clarification and the new terminology. I appreciate the education.
No problem! I feel like there's a bit of a high barrier to entry for asexual discourse because of all the terminology that's used almost exclusively within the asexual community itself. Many of the terms are useful, but many awareness efforts suffer for it a bit in my opinion.

When pursuing romantic relationships, is there usually a commonly expressed gender preference or are asexuals more likely to fall into a bisexual category as far as desired romantic pairing?
There was actually a fairly large survey on a major asexual website fairly recently, and the preliminary findings [https://asexualcensus.files.wordpress.com/2014/11/2014censuspreliminaryreport.pdf] includes romantic orientation. It seems that bi and pan combined makes up the largest proportion of romantic identities among asexuals at a little over 30% (well, of those who took the survey anyways, with all the potential for numbers to end up skewed in some respects). If not for the poll, I would have claimed that most of the asexuals I've seen online were hetero (which is still a significant chunk in its own right).
 

Lightknight

Mugwamp Supreme
Nov 26, 2008
4,860
0
0
I'm glad I checked back in or I would have missed your response!
Musette said:
Yeah, it's amazing how broad shoulders can complicate finding clothing that fit properly. From the times that I have worn dresses, I know full well how hard it is to find a dress that flatters broad shoulders (strapless dresses especially). I love my broad shoulders, but the women's fashion industry doesn't seem to!
I wonder if it's just something that's difficult to design clothes for or if they really don't recognize that some women have broad shoulders? My wife is a bit more comfortable if she uses a shawl with a dress to compensate for the dress not accommodating the shoulders. Makes her feel more old fashioned but it does work. But she's generally in jeans and a t-shirt on any given day so that's not something she has to put up with very frequently.

Thanks! I certainly try not to take my family for granted. I'm actually familiar with all the stores you've mentioned. (In fact, I have a bunch of fantastic formal collared shirts from Costco that were quite reasonable.) Strangely though, I don't remember the last time I've bought pants from any of those places. I will certainly keep that in mind next time I go searching for pants!
Costco is where my wife got those jeans she loves. Pants are very specific to the individual, of course, but I hope you find something you like.

(I'm also kinda putting up my own unnecessary barriers by not wanting to explain why I would specifically want men's pants yet also not wanting to just purchase them with some of my own money and appear as if I was trying to hide information since my family is so transparent/honest with each other. It's a pretty ridiculous reason, especially with such an accepting family, yet it's probably my biggest block.)
Do you want to wear them because they're more comfortable? If so, shouldn't that be enough information to give? As a man, I certainly wouldn't like jeans that squeeze my ass.

Success stories like what you've shared are always nice to hear! (In fact, one of my parents grew up in pretty extreme poverty and had a similar drastic shift for the better.) It's amazing how much things seem to change for the betters or you in 10 years time! Would you say it was mostly gradual, or did certain events sort of punctuate the change (such as going to a two-income household), if you don't mind my asking?
Hmm, it was somewhat gradual as far as five years can allow but with several certain events serving as significant steps up. The most significant change was actually having an income/job. I know that sounds dumb of me to say but really, the moment I actually had a job with reasonable pay, everything changed because of the way I used them.

I got a business administration degree in addition to that religion degree I mentioned. With the business degree I got two things: 1. A decent job in mid-2009 with a decent wage where I live (not great by any means, but fair middle class). 2. A wonderful education on how to manage my finances.

Personal finance is absolutely vital to making the most of what you have. Please let me know if you have any questions about this because I have helped several friends and family members get out of particularly sticky financial conditions. I strictly budgeted myself and allocated funds directly to certain accounts the moment my pay check came in. Retirement, investment accounts, etc. I paid down my debt faster than normal by addressing any debt I had by APR first rather than principle (though people who have trouble motivating themselves have higher level of success by paying off the low principle amounts first to gain early and easy successes at the cost of more money lost to interest later). I had a checking account and a savings account that I used religiously to budget by paying my bills, making my allotments and then moving any excess to savings so that only my regular spending amount was left in checking.

From there my debts went down and my savings went up. My investments performed pretty well and so I found myself in a weird situation where my income was drastically outweighed my debts. This was the first "step" up.

Once I got married we had two decent incomes and lived in a dirt cheap $400/month apartment. That was another season where our pay shot up and our means were very low. An especially beneficial part here is that my wife is low maintenance and is just as fiscally conscious as I am if not more. So spending hundreds on a single dress or shoes didn't hold us back. I would strongly recommend anyone to not insist on getting a several thousand dollar ring to start off their marriage. The wedding itself was a beautiful beach wedding that was also cheap, less than $5k. I got lucky and had worked as a professional blacksmith in college so I ran across a $250 ring that appraised for several thousand and had snapped it up. These low-price hurdles, the dual income and lower living expense, was the next step up.

After about half a year of that, we'd built up enough credit to purchase our first home. That was about 3.5 years ago. It was a starter home but a drastic improvement over that dirt-cheap apartment we'd had. Due to the current market the monthly price of the home ended up being cheaper than if we'd purchased a two bedroom apartment.

This year I purchased our dream home. The non-retirement accounts I'd invested in when I first got this job had improved to just enough for the down payment. My wife, whom I trust and rely on for many things, was casually looking for cheap homes for sale for about 6 months after I'd asked her to since she's pretty good with those kinds of long term projects. She found a very large house in town on a lot of acres just 9 minutes from work. We visited it and the land looked beautiful but the house looked like garbage from the outside (bad siding) and we couldn't see inside. I gave up on it but my wife insisted we set up a realtor appointment to go inside. From the inside, it was amazing. Newly renovated kitchen and there were about four rooms that weren't even listed or photographed to help the sale (dining room, master bathroom with corner tub, a study with built-in shelving, a spare room for... stuff I guess, it's now our music room/spare room). There's even a pond with a dock they failed to mention. Since it was already priced at less than a typical 3 bedroom/2 bath of much smaller size and no acreage, we jumped on it. Once our lending bank appraised it we learned that we really had found a deal and that the selling bank had drastically undervalued the house so us purchasing the house actually gave us a net-positive in equity without actually doing anything. So if we wanted to resell the house, we would likely profit significantly from it (especially now that I repaired the outside of the house and the plumbing).

We also successfully rented out the first house for a mild profit that we're just putting away for future repairs.

So that's the last step.

During all this time I've been getting promoted or getting raises in my company. I switched to a computer tech job and have excelled at it despite not having a degree in it. I literally call into major companies every day and tell them what is wrong with their network in minutes when five of their IT employees hadn't been able to figure it out (or had even caused the problem). I'm still not "well paid", but for where I live it's a nice salary. Combined we're well under six figures if that gives you any perspective on how well we've done with how little. But again, I live in a smallish city so the pay doesn't need to be six figures.

Now... under 30, I'm in a really weird position. I'm where I hoped to be in my 50's and have nothing to do financially except pay down any remaining debts and continue storing up for a retirement that actually seems feasible at a reasonable age. I really scratch my head at it all. I mean, my shoes had holes in them when I was a kid. It is absolutely astounding to me that the "American Dream" was so obtainable when I thought it was an automatic 30 year slog to get close. So definitely feel encouraged since I had absolutely no idea that I'd be here six years ago. Since I'd come from a lower middle class family I was really shocked to be launched forward so quickly after having seen my parents in the same situation for my whole life. Thankfully, my father has since gotten a major promotion and they're likely making a lot more now.

TL;DR of above spoiler
1. Got a decent job. 2009
2. Budgeted tightly.
3. Combined incomes. 2010
4. Made wise investments. (Retirement, non-retirment accounts, first house in 2011, second in 2014)
5. Lived well within our means thanks to the budgeting which expedited paying off bills to leave more money in our pockets per month.

Good point! No need to get too worked up over it, and I never let others' expectations affect how I dressed for my performances before, so why start now?
Good for you!

Yeah, it's rather bizarre how much semantics gets thrown into the equation, but I suppose there's also the element of declaring yourself as something other than straight factoring in. (Hence the "it's just a phase" accusations that pop up a fair amount for the LGBT+ crowd.)
So if some asexuals still express a romance orientation or a sex orientation, is it feasible for a long term relationship with an asexual of similar orientation? Please forgive me if that's an ignorant question to ask.

I'm sure there's a degree of confirmation bias that factors in when people use religious texts to back their arguments. (Same as anything else really, and as an outsider looking in, I certainly still have my own biases that help shape my opinion on the matter.)
Oh sure. You've got to see religious texts as a book of "givens"/assumptions being brought into a discussion. You can't have much more of a bias than when givens are set in stone and are brought into any conversation you have.

Your background on the topic is absolutely fascinating! On a personal spiritual level, I've probably always been essentially apathetic to religion. (I actually couldn't tell you what my religious beliefs were as a child because I don't remember ever having any profound thoughts on the topic.) Still, the ethnomusicologist in me really sparked an interest in the topic because of the major role religion plays in shaping a culture, and the role music plays within many religions. (I remember reading about the Bira Ceremonies within Shona culture and being absolutely captivated by it.) Even the early history of Western music fascinates me in a similar way, as a lens into a culture removed from my own. (Regardless of my own religious apathy, I love a lot of music associated with religions from all over the world, and Gregorian Chant is no exception.)
Oh, interesting! I hadn't really given all that much thought to religion's impact on music but now that you mention it, that should certainly warrant more research on my part. Hmm, thanks for that perspective! I'm trained in classical guitar and my wife has a variety of instruments in her skills list so I am interested in that.

I will certainly say that I have a lot of respect for your relationship with your faith! It's amazing how much anti-theist sentiments (as well as extreme religious ones) have shaped this sort of polarizing "you either believe in God or science, not both" stance that is so widespread. Even though some of the more judgmental/aggressive Christians I've interacted with gave me a bit of a bad taste in my mouth, (my university has some very active religious organizations and back when I was naive enough to be honest about my agnosticism when asked, I got more than my fair share of "oh, you're just confused; reading the bible should fix that" as well as "technically, you're going to hell" thrown at me,) I know better than to blame the faith rather than the individuals. My percussion professor, who happens to be the best educator I've ever had the pleasure of learning under, happens to be fairly religious (he took a musician mission trip to Kenya last year and plays regularly for his church, so I presume he's religious anyways,) and I couldn't imagine writing him (or anyone) off because of religion. There's no need to apologize for your religious views or fear that I'd think less of you for it.
Ah, did your campus have screaming preachers? My university did and let me tell you, that was embarrassing with an emphasis on 'ass'. While I am certainly intellectually in the deist category (as far as believing that the universe was most likely created without necessarily being someone or something we can personally know), I am quick to admit that my adherence to Christianity specifically is necessarily a step of faith beyond that intellectual position and not a logical or rational conclusion by any means. In fact, Christian scripture indicates that is how it works so for someone to tell you that you're just confused is a silly thing of them to say when scripture itself indicates that belief in Christ requires faith in the unproven rather than acceptance of assumed facts. Not sure why people make firm statements if they haven't studied the material enough to speak from a learned position.

Actually, I wouldn't treat one potential form of isolation from your peers as inherently better or worse than the other. I have moments where I really notice just how different I am from my peers, but it's more of the combination of multiple factors than me focusing on one aspect of myself. (I actually tend to feel especially isolated among more traditionally feminine non-musician women in particular because percussion is a niche predominantly masculine field, as is music composition, and my interest in video games as art as well as the industry itself doesn't help much either. Asexuality just tends to be the icing on the cake for me.) It's very frustrating when you can't find someone whose philosophies are similar to your own, especially in groups congregated over a common identity like religious belief, and I'm not surprised that could isolate you from your peers.
I'm sorry to hear that. Sounds like you'd get along with us just fine.

No problem! I feel like there's a bit of a high barrier to entry for asexual discourse because of all the terminology that's used almost exclusively within the asexual community itself. Many of the terms are useful, but many awareness efforts suffer for it a bit in my opinion.
The term is certainly a lot more complex to discuss than heterosexuality or homosexuality.

There was actually a fairly large survey on a major asexual website fairly recently, and the preliminary findings [https://asexualcensus.files.wordpress.com/2014/11/2014censuspreliminaryreport.pdf] includes romantic orientation. It seems that bi and pan combined makes up the largest proportion of romantic identities among asexuals at a little over 30% (well, of those who took the survey anyways, with all the potential for numbers to end up skewed in some respects). If not for the poll, I would have claimed that most of the asexuals I've seen online were hetero (which is still a significant chunk in its own right).
Very interesting! Thanks for the resource. Fascinating ratio of religious belief compared to the general population.

What would you say is the difference between someone who would classify themselves as a romantic orientation asexual as compared to a heterosexual, bisexual, or homosexual that just isn't interested in sex? If someone isn't interested in sex would they automatically fall into the asexual category?

By contrast, do you know what the typical preferred gender would be for asexuals with the sex orientation?

Wow... this is clearly something I know far less about than I thought. Had no idea about the subcategories. Terms Demiromantic and Gray-romantic are making the study difficult for me to wrap my head around. But the study itself seems to indicate that even Asexuals can be confused by the diversity of terms at times. I certainly did not expect the "celibate" ratio to be less than 12%. This has been eye opening.
 

Little Gray

New member
Sep 18, 2012
499
0
0
Raikas said:
Little Gray said:
I am not saying they are bad or should not be added but I have yet to see a game where a persons sexuality is relevant in any way at all.
Eh, I can see how that would be true if you're primarily playing puzzle or racing games, but as soon as you move into story-related ones, there's a solid number of games where a character's motivations are related to the person they're involved with. And what's that if not giving relevance to their sexuality?
But it doesn't. Even in a game with a large romantic plot changing the gender on somebody has no actual effect on the story. Making it a gay romance instead of a straight one neither contributes or detracts from the actual game.
 

Raikas

New member
Sep 4, 2012
640
0
0
Little Gray said:
Raikas said:
Little Gray said:
I am not saying they are bad or should not be added but I have yet to see a game where a persons sexuality is relevant in any way at all.
Eh, I can see how that would be true if you're primarily playing puzzle or racing games, but as soon as you move into story-related ones, there's a solid number of games where a character's motivations are related to the person they're involved with. And what's that if not giving relevance to their sexuality?
But it doesn't. Even in a game with a large romantic plot changing the gender on somebody has no actual effect on the story. Making it a gay romance instead of a straight one neither contributes or detracts from the actual game.
The point of the list of irrelevant games seemed to be games where relationships of any type coupling is irrelevant, which is a different issue that the one you seem to be responding to - I agree that a good majority of relationship-driven content wouldn't be particularly changed by swapping the genders, but that seems to be a response to a different part of the conversation.
 

Lightknight

Mugwamp Supreme
Nov 26, 2008
4,860
0
0
Duster said:
I'm up for the occasional wall of text but good god.
I'm up for the occasional low content post but good god.

You don't have to read and you also don't have to post. Not obligatory by any means.