We've all met our fair share of Sony Plastation and X-Box Halo fanboys, who just refuse to look at the facts, and insist on their point of view being the ONLY correct way of thinking. (Such as the eternal wait for FFXIII; or automatic health regeneration in Halo). Now, it seems to me this kind of Fanboyism is even worse in real life, and none more so than in politics. Since the subject of Tibet interests me a lot, I will use it as the discussion point here:
MY POINT
I'm Chinese / British, i.e. I identify with both. I'm interested in reading about Tibet, because it seems like a fascinating fantasy world. But, recently my Chinese friends noticed the books on my shelf, and they were extremely angry with me. They seem to think that anybody who:
1) Criticises the Communist Party.
and 2) Reads up on anything about Tibet / Taiwan / Tian'an'men '89 / Cultural revolution / etc, and tries to form some sort of informed opinion on the matter, instead of blindly supporting everything the Communist party says.
and 3) Prefers a democratic system to a totalitarianist state.
...is a traitor. In my Chinese circle, anyone who does NOT mindlessly follow the Communist party is seen as a traitor, and a lot of the time this includes me. {This has it's parallels in America too, when anyone who doesn't support the Iraq war was Unpatriotic. Anyone who doesn't support those anti-terrorist laws must be terrorist sympathisers. I believe even Atheists are seen as unpatriotic in America.}
My Chinese friends totally believe that "Tibet was, is, and always will be part of China.", despite having never read anything about Tibetan history or culture, and having never been to Tibet, or met a Tibetan in real life. They would also go out and wave red flags and shout down Tibetan demonstrators, if they get bored enough. Now, not only do they not have any information to base their views on, they are also telling me to stop reading anything about Tibet not written by the Communist party, and support the party's views. This reminds me of Orwell's 1984.
The interesting thing is, it's not unlikely that the other side of this argument, i.e. the people waving those Tibetan flags, are also equally blinded by bigotry. Because in the west the most popular books and films on Tibet are also very biased, sometimes even more so than official Chinese published books. And then there are the hippies who goes and waves the Tibetan flags, probably not knowing anything about the oppression of the feudal Tibetan system before 1950. So they mistakingly believe somehow Tibetan independence is a symbol of freedom.
Is ignorance bliss? Then at least you are not hated by both sides.
A bit of history
Tibet was unified as a political entity in the 7th century. In the 13th century the Mongols conquered most of Asia, including all of the land that's now controlled by PR China (i.e. including Tibet). Then, for the next 600+ years, the Chinese dynasties and the Repulican government has included Tibet as part of their territory. Due the extreme remoteness, stratigic insignificance, and relative poverty of Tibet in this era; the amount of power, and the nature of the power exercised by the Beijing government in Tibet is a point of debate.
i.e. if you were the emperor and had a few hundred wives, then you wouldn't give a damn about whether some piece of autonomously governed rock is in theory part of your kingdom or not. As long as they don't declare war on you, all is fine.
A bit of culture
Tibet does have a different language / religion / culture / etc to other provinces in China. HOWEVER, most Chinese provinces also have a different verbal language / gods and traditions / culture / etc to most other provinces in China.
Tibet was unified as a political entity in the 7th century. In the 13th century the Mongols conquered most of Asia, including all of the land that's now controlled by PR China (i.e. including Tibet). Then, for the next 600+ years, the Chinese dynasties and the Repulican government has included Tibet as part of their territory. Due the extreme remoteness, stratigic insignificance, and relative poverty of Tibet in this era; the amount of power, and the nature of the power exercised by the Beijing government in Tibet is a point of debate.
i.e. if you were the emperor and had a few hundred wives, then you wouldn't give a damn about whether some piece of autonomously governed rock is in theory part of your kingdom or not. As long as they don't declare war on you, all is fine.
A bit of culture
Tibet does have a different language / religion / culture / etc to other provinces in China. HOWEVER, most Chinese provinces also have a different verbal language / gods and traditions / culture / etc to most other provinces in China.
MY POINT
I'm Chinese / British, i.e. I identify with both. I'm interested in reading about Tibet, because it seems like a fascinating fantasy world. But, recently my Chinese friends noticed the books on my shelf, and they were extremely angry with me. They seem to think that anybody who:
1) Criticises the Communist Party.
and 2) Reads up on anything about Tibet / Taiwan / Tian'an'men '89 / Cultural revolution / etc, and tries to form some sort of informed opinion on the matter, instead of blindly supporting everything the Communist party says.
and 3) Prefers a democratic system to a totalitarianist state.
...is a traitor. In my Chinese circle, anyone who does NOT mindlessly follow the Communist party is seen as a traitor, and a lot of the time this includes me. {This has it's parallels in America too, when anyone who doesn't support the Iraq war was Unpatriotic. Anyone who doesn't support those anti-terrorist laws must be terrorist sympathisers. I believe even Atheists are seen as unpatriotic in America.}
My Chinese friends totally believe that "Tibet was, is, and always will be part of China.", despite having never read anything about Tibetan history or culture, and having never been to Tibet, or met a Tibetan in real life. They would also go out and wave red flags and shout down Tibetan demonstrators, if they get bored enough. Now, not only do they not have any information to base their views on, they are also telling me to stop reading anything about Tibet not written by the Communist party, and support the party's views. This reminds me of Orwell's 1984.
The interesting thing is, it's not unlikely that the other side of this argument, i.e. the people waving those Tibetan flags, are also equally blinded by bigotry. Because in the west the most popular books and films on Tibet are also very biased, sometimes even more so than official Chinese published books. And then there are the hippies who goes and waves the Tibetan flags, probably not knowing anything about the oppression of the feudal Tibetan system before 1950. So they mistakingly believe somehow Tibetan independence is a symbol of freedom.
Is ignorance bliss? Then at least you are not hated by both sides.