TimeLord Reviews: The Weeping Angels

Recommended Videos

TimeLord

For the Emperor!
Legacy
Aug 15, 2008
7,506
3
43


Welcome all ye to the start of my very first super awesome series of reviews regarding anything and everything Doctor Who culminating in a special topic review for my 10,000th post. But that's a long time away.

...... well not really. Time travel and all that.

Without further ado, let's jump right in with a favourite of mine. The Weeping Angels!



"Don't blink. Blink and you're dead. They are fast! Faster than you can imagine! Don't turn your back. Don't look away. And don't blink. Good Luck." - The 10th Doctor

The Weeping Angels are a brand new enemy for the Doctor created by Steven Moffat and first appearing in the 2007 episode "Blink". They appear as a stone humanoid with stone wings. Their unique feature being that if they are viewed by any sentient creature in the universe, they freeze into rock or become "quantum-locked", occupying a single position in space.

"No choice. It's a fact of their biology." - The 10th Doctor

[img_inline width=275 height=225 align="left" Caption="Rawr!"]http://i213.photobucket.com/albums/cc159/tau600/Doctor%20Who%20Album/weeping_angel.jpg[/img_inline]The obvious theory here is that when they are not being viewed by a living creature. They can move freely. They are stated and seen to move very fast when not being viewed. Covering distances in short periods of time.

They also appear to be able to fly. As in the episode 'Blink' they follow Sally Sparrow into a city and are seen on top of a roof. However, this has never been confirmed in show but makes sense. However, if they were ever viewed when flying, then they would turn to stone and presumably fall to they death. Although it has not been established whether "quantum-locked" actually means stone for an easy explanation by the Doctor, or it actually means indestructible.


"That's not the way they Angels kill you. They displace you in time" - The 11th Doctor

Their main way of defeating anything in their path is the 'touch of an Angel'. Depending on the individual Angel, once touched by an Angel, you will be transported back in time to a specific year. The Angel then feeds on your potential energy of the moments you would have had in your time stream's future. In theory, if there was another Angel at your arrival point in the past, then they could do the same again and send you back even further. But that would require communication back though time which the Angels do not possess without external technology.
The transference of energy when you are displaced is enough to be traceable by someone with the right equipment.[footnote]The Doctor built himself a "Timey Wimey Detector" that went bing when there's stuff[/footnote]
However, the Angels also possess great strength, as in the series 5 episodes 'Flesh and Stone' and 'Time of Angels' they snap the necks of their victims as they require their bodies. Although it turns out they only need one body for the voice box of 'Sacred Bob'. It is possible that everyone killed before him was incompatible.
This points out the the Angels can't speak. At least not through their mouths. They do communicate with the Doctor through a communicator after using the voice box of the dead Sacred Bob.

.....lovely.

[img_inline width=250 height=225 align="right" Caption="If I can't see you. You can't see me!"]http://i213.photobucket.com/albums/cc159/tau600/Doctor%20Who%20Album/weeping_angel1.jpg[/img_inline] The Angels cannot look each other in the eye for the reason that they will trap themselves in their stone form forever, as they are both living creatures looking at each other. This is how their name is derived, as they cover their eyes to avoid this, resembling the image that they are weeping. This is how they were defeated in their first appearance in 2007. The 4 Angels were trying to gain entrance to the TARDIS. Each of them on one side of the TARDIS. When the TARDIS disappeared, the Angels were left looking at each other. Trapped forever unless one or more were moved away by human hands.

"That which holds the image of an Angel becomes itself an Angel." - The 11th Doctor

An ability established in 'Time of Angels', if there is an image of an Angel then if it not being viewed, the Angel can literally immerge from the image, removing themselves from it's original place. This is seen to happen when a 4 second, looped recording of an Angel literally moves when not viewed by Amy Pond. Despite being a looped recording, the Angels moves in real time and moved right up to the camera before beginning to transfer itself outside the screen into the room. It also controls the TV screen, forcing it to stay on when Amy attempts to turn it off to stop the Angel. The Angel is defeated when the TV is switched off at the point when the loop starts. This, however, does not kill the Angel, it merely takes it back to the vault in the Bysantium where it started. Which leads me to my next point.

"It's turning out the light!" - Sally Sparrow

Weeping Angels appear to have the handy ability to disable an electronic light source so the can move freely. In 'Blink' they turn out the single light in the basement of the house. In 'Time of Angels' and 'Flesh and Stone', they are seen to disable the gravity globe, artificial forest and various torches.

"The crash of the Bysantium wasn't accident. It was a rescue mission!" - The 11th Doctor

The Angels gain energy by absorbing a power source. In the case of attempting to gain access to the energy of the TARDIS. Or absorbing the energy of the Bysantium?s reactor. Draining the power from the rest of the ship.



'Blink' established that the Angel's ability to turn to stone was based on a biological fact. Something they couldn't change. However 'Flesh and Stone' show the Angels as stone without Amy Pond viewing them, as they "think" they are being viewed by her even though she walks with her eyes closed.

The problem I see here is that if the Angel?s ability was beyond their control, then they wouldn?t be stone to start with, as they were not being viewed. Showing that the Angels have a choice over the ability.

"...and they have survived this long because they have the most perfect defence system ever evolved. They are Quantum Locked. They don't exist when they are being observed. The moment they are seen by any other living creature they freeze into rock. No choice, it's a fact of their biology. In the sight of any living thing, they literally turn into stone." - The Doctor

It would seem that despite both stories being written by Steven Moffat, he still contradicted himself in this way. Unless there is a story that has yet to be released that better explains this ability.



The added video is of extremely poor quality, but it was the only one I could find and proves my point.
As stated above, in 'Flesh and Stone' the Angels quantum-lock themselves while Amy is walking blind through them. At the point where Amy falls and cannot find the communicator, the Angels cotton on that she is blind and begin to move. All great in theory. Until the action of the Angel moving is seen on screen. Basically, the Angels move while apparently still stone coloured/textured, although they do not blink themselves, and show no other features other than basic movement.

Personally; this was a bad move. Ever since the Angels were introduced in 2007, I have wondered how they move. I didn?t want to find out, because that would ruin the mystery of them. When the simply jumped from one place to another. It was super freaky! But being able to visualise how they do it ruins that fact about them.

My exact word to describe this when it happened and the word I will use in the future for it will always be this exact phrase: "Ehhhhh"

Another point made by fellow TARDIS Crew member [user]Hiraeth[/user] is that while the audience is watching the episode, they are holding the Angels still by viewing them in the same way Amy did in 'Time of Angels'. This holds true for Blink but not for 'Time of Angels'/'Flesh and Stone' and is something very disappointing that it wasn't kept constant and was a missed opportunity by Steven Moffat.



Still here? Excellent!

All of what I am complaining about is irrelevant in the grand scheme of things. The Angels are a fantastic new enemy for the new series and they don't rely on guns or military force.
'Blink' still rates high in my top 5 Doctor Who episodes of all time as the episode itself was a perfect mix of mystery, enemies and appearances by the Doctor. But any other enemy would not have made it as brilliant an episode as it was. They story felt more tailored around the Angels rather than the story being written and the Angels brought in to fill in a gap.
Which is fantastic, and I hope to see more of them in times to come.

Here's some added info about the Angels from Mr.10 himself​
 

Tharwen

Ep. VI: Return of the turret
May 7, 2009
9,144
0
41
I still think the best way to defeat/get around them is to go and hide in a pet shop, or release a load of flies into the area.

I agree with the thing about them moving in Flesh and Stone. I think it ruined their mystery, and that Amy should be dead. Fortunately, though, she isn't.
 

thejboy88

New member
Aug 29, 2010
1,515
0
0
Loved that episode. As for the angels themselve, I loved the idea behind them. A monster which caanot actually be seen moving and yet it is still dangerous. How brilliant is that. In Britain it has become a common phrase to "hide behind the couch" or to cover your eyes when watching Doctor Who. now we have a monster which actually needs you to cover you eyes to get you. PERFECT.
 

RobCoxxy

New member
Feb 22, 2009
2,034
0
0
Nice review, Sam. I was glad they let Steven Moffat have a stab at some of the 10th Doctor's episodes, they were a lot better than the Deus Ex Machina heavy Russel T. Davies episodes.
 

Meestor Pickle

New member
Jul 29, 2010
405
0
0
Oh those angels are quite scary, not like you can really fight them.
Great little series I think you'll have going here, keep it up!

I never did understand however that the Doctor and friends need to blink as such not just close one eye and give it a brake, open it and then the other.
 

maninahat

New member
Nov 8, 2007
4,397
0
0
Blink[i/] was quite easily the best new doctor Who episode I had seen. I don't actually like Dr Who all that much (especially the David Tennant version), which may be partly why I really like this episode. He (the Doctor) hardly appears in it except in cameo, which is good because the doctor is so intellectually over powered, he can often ruin the tension. The story is water tight, the time travel concepts are original and very well inserted. The enemy is interesting, and the good guys do not spend the whole time running.
 

Susano

New member
Dec 25, 2008
436
0
0
TimeLord said:
As stated above, in 'Flesh and Stone' the Angels quantum-lock themselves while Amy is walking blind through them. At the point where Amy falls and cannot find the communicator, the Angels cotton on that she is blind and begin to move. All great in theory. Until the action of the Angel moving is seen on screen. Basically, the Angels move while apparently still stone coloured/textured, although they do not blink themselves, and show no other features other than basic movement.

Personally; this was a bad move. Ever since the Angels were introduced in 2007, I have wondered how they move. I didn?t want to find out, because that would ruin the mystery of them. When the simply jumped from one place to another. It was super freaky! But being able to visualise how they do it ruins that fact about them.

My exact word to describe this when it happened and the word I will use in the future for it will always be this exact phrase: "Ehhhhh"
Another point made by fellow TARDIS Crew member [user]Hiraeth[/user] is that while the audience is watching the episode, they are holding the Angels still by viewing them in the same way Amy did in 'Time of Angels'. This holds true for Blink but not for 'Time of Angels'/'Flesh and Stone' and is something very disappointing that it wasn't kept constant and was a missed opportunity by Steven Moffat.
Television, and all animation, is a series of still images run really quickly together.

They're THAT FAST

Love the review, keep it up ^^
 

interspark

New member
Dec 20, 2009
3,271
0
0
ok, can someone help me here? in 10's last episode, when Rassilon said that only two Time Lords voted against his plan, why did he suddenly say "the Weeping Angels of old"?

OT: yeah, great episode, great monsters, loved it! but i definately preffered "Blink"
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,756
0
0
Blink remains one of my favourite episodes. It worked better than the other ones, though, in part because of the mystery you mention. Seeing the Angels move did hurt that episode for me. I can suspend disbelief on the fact that they locked when they thought Amy could see them. Just because it's a biological fact doesn't mean that the trigger isn't tied to their own awareness. But watching them move? Meh. That was annoying as crap. And it really didn't need to be done to add drama.

I was afraid of this the minute I found out the lonely assassins were back. They were such an awesome villain, I worried anything else would ruin it. And while they weren't ruined, they were kind of diminished. It's hard to recapture the kind of magic that Blink had. From us never seeing them encounter the Doctor directly to the suspense of the episode to the clever way in which they communicate with Sally, everything sort of worked.

I still enjoyed the episodes, though. And I still love the Angels. Overall, still strong as a villain and a strong plot point.
 

joebthegreat

New member
Nov 23, 2010
194
0
0
Its all very interesting, I'm looking forward to learning more about the Doctor's universe. And I'm definitely hoping to learn a lot of things about the older Doctor. I'm always interested in hearing about where things originated and the genuinely bad/ineffectual/selfish things he's done.
 

The Cheezy One

Christian. Take that from me.
Dec 13, 2008
1,912
0
0
My LITERAL favourite episode. The recovery of the angels in this series killed it for me a bit, but not enough for the episode to stop being awesome!

Wasn't Sally Sparrow supposed to become an assistant, but she got catapulted into stardom?
I liked her because she didn't get all whiney and moralistic (Rose) or whiney and annoying (Tate).
Best quote ever: "m clever, and I'm listening. Now don't patronise me, 'cause people have died and I'm not happy. Tell me."
 

Mr Cwtchy

New member
Jan 13, 2009
1,044
0
0
Midnight Entity was creepier IMO. Although that may be because I've seen the WA plastered everywhere they've kinda lost their sting.

Nice review though. Would love to see more of them.
 

Reeves88

New member
Jul 4, 2009
54
0
0
im a bit suprised somthing like this hasnt been done before on the escapist keep up the awesome reviews and i have to saw the angels are by far my fav villan
 

dudycat1

New member
Dec 16, 2010
66
0
0
interspark" post="326.251924.9353222 said:
ok, can someone help me here? in 10's last episode, when Rassilon said that only two Time Lords voted against his plan, why did he suddenly say "the Weeping Angels of old"

im pressuming that they are the origenal weeping angles or something like that
 

TimeLord

For the Emperor!
Legacy
Aug 15, 2008
7,506
3
43
interspark said:
ok, can someone help me here? in 10's last episode, when Rassilon said that only two Time Lords voted against his plan, why did he suddenly say "the Weeping Angels of old"?

OT: yeah, great episode, great monsters, loved it! but i definately preffered "Blink"
That is because the 2 Time Lords who voted against Rassilon were forced to stand by him with their hands covering their faces in shame. So they looked like Weeping Angels :)
 

interspark

New member
Dec 20, 2009
3,271
0
0
TimeLord said:
interspark said:
ok, can someone help me here? in 10's last episode, when Rassilon said that only two Time Lords voted against his plan, why did he suddenly say "the Weeping Angels of old"?

OT: yeah, great episode, great monsters, loved it! but i definately preffered "Blink"
That is because the 2 Time Lords who voted against Rassilon were forced to stand by him with their hands covering their faces in shame. So they looked like Weeping Angels :)
i see, thanks for clearing that up :D
 

TimeLord

For the Emperor!
Legacy
Aug 15, 2008
7,506
3
43
Generic Gamer said:
TimeLord said:
My favourite theory I heard (on TvTropes I think) is that the Angels aren't actually moving when Amy's blind. They're moving in between the frames of the TV camera.
That's all very well, but what about when you first see the Angels around Amy before she falls? They aren't moving and no one is looking at them except the audience. So they should be moving in between the frames at that point too. My argument is then counteracted with the 11th Doctor saying "they are acting on instinct" to which I reply with the the 10th Doctor saying "no choice, it's a fact of their biology".

Also, in Blink when Sally visits the house and takes the TARDIS key from the Angels, the Angels are frozen when the camera views them but Sally has her back to them. So unless there is a mouse in the room watching them then the audience is holding them still there. But should still be moving between frames using the TvTropes argument.


I love continuity errors :)
 

LostTimeLady

New member
Dec 17, 2009
733
0
0
Excellent review of the angels TimeLord!
It's rather funny listening to the DVD easter egg without Sally filling in the gaps!

I could rant all day about how it was a mistake having the angels move but it doesn't stop 'em being one of the scariest DW monsters.

Nice one TimeLord.