Titanfall Review - Mechs and the City

Jimothy Sterling

New member
Apr 18, 2011
5,976
0
0
Titanfall Review - Mechs and the City

It's not the "revolution" some say it is, but boy is it a thrill ride.

Read Full Article
 

neonsword13-ops

~ Struck by a Smooth Criminal ~
Mar 28, 2011
2,771
0
0
inb4 accusations of Xbox fanboyism for giving a good score to an Xbox game and how giving 4/5 stars = "a bad score".

Anyway, excellent review, Jimmy boy.

I would be playing it, but sadly, my sister owns the 360 now and I do not own an Xbone. I'm planning on picking it up for PC during the summer after I build my first PC. It should be quite enthralling. And when I'm playing on PC, I will get the benefit of higher framerate and higher fidelity. So that's always neat. Until then, I will be waiting for InFamous: Second Son to come out later this month. The PS4's been collection some good amount of dust lately.
 

V4Viewtiful

New member
Feb 12, 2014
721
0
0
neonsword13-ops said:
I'm planning on picking it up for PC during the summer after I build my first PC. It should be quite enthralling. And when I'm playing on PC, I will get the benefit of higher framerate and higher fidelity. So that's always neat.
It is, enjoy:)

I'm not much for online shooters but I may give this one a try.
 

StriderShinryu

New member
Dec 8, 2009
4,987
0
0
Pretty much in line with my own thoughts. Very fun and engaging, but more notable for everything it puts together in one extremely solid polished package than for anything it necessarily does that's totally unique. Maybe not revolutionary, but definitely evolutionary and I think other multiplayer competitive shooters are going to have a very hard time competing.
 

Zhukov

The Laughing Arsehole
Dec 29, 2009
13,768
0
0
From what I've seen, it looks like fun.

Sadly, the system requirements make my poor, outdated, long suffering stalwart of a PC curl up in a corner and cry.
 

Metalrocks

New member
Jan 15, 2009
2,406
0
0
played it right after the countdown. had so far a blast after playing it for an hour. even when i kept loosing every round but i dint care. i just fun and thats what matters to me.
 

Roxas1359

Burn, Burn it All!
Aug 8, 2009
33,758
0
0
I will say that this game does have my interests. I might actually consider making an Origin account to play this game because everything I've seen is interesting. This is coming from someone who doesn't generally like online multiplayer, or really multiplayer games at all really.
 

Jimothy Sterling

New member
Apr 18, 2011
5,976
0
0
Zhukov said:
From what I've seen, it looks like fun.

Sadly, the system requirements make my poor, outdated, long suffering stalwart of a PC curl up in a corner and cry.
It ran on my 5 year old system :p ... at medium-high settings

Maybe you can try it anyway, might actually work?
 

chozo_hybrid

Jund 'Em Out!
Jul 15, 2009
3,456
0
0
Good review, it does look like it won't disappoint.

Charcharo said:
Zhukov said:
From what I've seen, it looks like fun.

Sadly, the system requirements make my poor, outdated, long suffering stalwart of a PC curl up in a corner and cry.
It ran on my 5 year old system :p ... at medium-high settings

Maybe you can try it anyway, might actually work?
I was surprised how well my machine ran it in the beta, when I wasn't having connection and ping issues.

Just hope they get some servers up for us in NZ/AUS, lumping us in with southeast Asia connection wise is rough...
 

Sarge034

New member
Feb 24, 2011
1,623
0
0
I am legitimately interested now. The biggest problem I've had with CoD is the ever increasingly complicated maps. It almost seems like the maps are getting more and more "camper" friendly with every iteration. Gosh, I miss the days of CoD 4...
 

Zhukov

The Laughing Arsehole
Dec 29, 2009
13,768
0
0
Charcharo said:
Zhukov said:
From what I've seen, it looks like fun.

Sadly, the system requirements make my poor, outdated, long suffering stalwart of a PC curl up in a corner and cry.
It ran on my 5 year old system :p ... at medium-high settings

Maybe you can try it anyway, might actually work?
Nah.

It says it requires the 64 bit version of windows.

I have 32 bit installed and I'm unable to upgrade because my DVD drive is broken.
 

gorfias

Unrealistic but happy
Legacy
Apr 6, 2020
4,772
379
88
Country
USA
Reminds me of Shadowrun. Me and a buddy were so pissed. $60 and no single player. There's just too many online shooters already for this to make me interested.

Let me know when PS4 gets its first Uncharted game.
 

Kimarous

New member
Sep 23, 2009
2,011
0
0
Recommendation: Does punching a robot with your robot sound like a good time?
Yes, but the Pacific Rim fighting game sucked regardless.

Even if you list all the game's other qualities, it doesn't help the fact that it's online-only. In other words, something that amounts to a brick once the servers die off... or just flat-out die. Also, I have what's called a "life" wherein I need to pause regularly, so an online title that requires constant, undivided attention for extended periods is impractical and intrusive.

I'll admit that certain aspects do look somewhat enjoyable, but nothing that's worth $60 in my book.
 

The Great Fungus

New member
Dec 9, 2013
19
0
0
Zhukov said:
Charcharo said:
Zhukov said:
From what I've seen, it looks like fun.

Sadly, the system requirements make my poor, outdated, long suffering stalwart of a PC curl up in a corner and cry.
It ran on my 5 year old system :p ... at medium-high settings

Maybe you can try it anyway, might actually work?
Nah.

It says it requires the 64 bit version of windows.

I have 32 bit installed and I'm unable to upgrade because my DVD drive is broken.
You don't need a DVD drive. You could make a bootable USB stick with the Windows ISO on it. Microsoft has released all the ISOs online. Just make sure you have a 64 bit compatible CPU and a valid 64 bit license.

Edit: I'd also like to add that I'm not aware of any reason why this method shouldn't work. However, that doesn't mean that there isn't one. While I know my way around a computer, I'm by no means an expert. I therefore suggest further research into the matter.
 

Zhukov

The Laughing Arsehole
Dec 29, 2009
13,768
0
0
The Great Fungus said:
Zhukov said:
Charcharo said:
Zhukov said:
From what I've seen, it looks like fun.

Sadly, the system requirements make my poor, outdated, long suffering stalwart of a PC curl up in a corner and cry.
It ran on my 5 year old system :p ... at medium-high settings

Maybe you can try it anyway, might actually work?
Nah.

It says it requires the 64 bit version of windows.

I have 32 bit installed and I'm unable to upgrade because my DVD drive is broken.
You don't need a DVD drive. You could make a bootable USB stick with the Windows ISO on it. Microsoft has released all the ISOs online. Just make sure you have a 64 bit compatible CPU and a valid 64 bit license.

Edit: I'd also like to add that I'm not aware of any reason why this method shouldn't work. However, that doesn't mean that there isn't one. While I know my way around a computer, I'm by no means an expert. I therefore suggest further research into the matter.
Yeah, I've been looking into that. WIll probably give it a try.

Although knowing my luck with computers it will probably all end in tears and shards of molten motherboard.
 

shintakie10

New member
Sep 3, 2008
1,342
0
0
Kimarous said:
Recommendation: Does punching a robot with your robot sound like a good time?
Yes, but the Pacific Rim fighting game sucked regardless.

Even if you list all the game's other qualities, it doesn't help the fact that it's online-only. In other words, something that amounts to a brick once the servers die off... or just flat-out die. Also, I have what's called a "life" wherein I need to pause regularly, so an online title that requires constant, undivided attention for extended periods is impractical and intrusive.

I'll admit that certain aspects do look somewhat enjoyable, but nothing that's worth $60 in my book.
Nice jab at people that play online games there. Real classy.

On topic!

I'm really sad about this honestly. I want to play the game because it looks like a ton of fun, but I refuse to support those douchebags Zampella and West. Though I guess at this point I'd only be supportin Zampella, but its hard to figure out which of the two was the bigger douchebag between them.

Maybe when its on some super reduced cost I'll snag it up, but even that feels a bit iffy considerin I'd still be giving money to Zampella in the end, even if its a fraction of what it would be at full price.
 

bunnielovekins

New member
Mar 1, 2013
39
0
0
ONLY 4 STARS FUCK YOU JIM BLARGH

Would be interested to find out if there's any tearing on the pc version - though I won't be getting it until the price goes way down.
 

MonkeyPunch

New member
Feb 20, 2008
589
0
0
Kimarous said:
Even if you list all the game's other qualities, it doesn't help the fact that it's online-only. In other words, something that amounts to a brick once the servers die off... or just flat-out die. Also, I have what's called a "life" wherein I need to pause regularly, so an online title that requires constant, undivided attention for extended periods is impractical and intrusive.

I'll admit that certain aspects do look somewhat enjoyable, but nothing that's worth $60 in my book.
Gorfias said:
Reminds me of Shadowrun. Me and a buddy were so pissed. $60 and no single player. There's just too many online shooters already for this to make me interested.

Let me know when PS4 gets its first Uncharted game.
I was just wondering. Do you two jump in to threads about inherently single player games and bemoan that there's no multiplayer?
Do you maybe subscribe to the idea that not every game (Second son for eg.) needs multiplayer? (and maybe frown when a publisher shoe-horns multiplayer in to a title that blatantly never needed it)

Do you go in to other multiplayer only games threads such as... dunno, Loadout, Planetside 2, Hearthstone, Guild Wars 2 etc. and bring up the same points?

///

I'm really glad I got to play the beta because that's actually when I was more-or-less sure I was going to buy this game and the reviews aren't pointing out any downsides yet.
Sure when the masses arrive (me amidst them) server might be shaky, but it all seems pretty smooth at the moment.
 

The Great Fungus

New member
Dec 9, 2013
19
0
0
Zhukov said:
The Great Fungus said:
Zhukov said:
Charcharo said:
Zhukov said:
From what I've seen, it looks like fun.

Sadly, the system requirements make my poor, outdated, long suffering stalwart of a PC curl up in a corner and cry.
It ran on my 5 year old system :p ... at medium-high settings

Maybe you can try it anyway, might actually work?
Nah.

It says it requires the 64 bit version of windows.

I have 32 bit installed and I'm unable to upgrade because my DVD drive is broken.
You don't need a DVD drive. You could make a bootable USB stick with the Windows ISO on it. Microsoft has released all the ISOs online. Just make sure you have a 64 bit compatible CPU and a valid 64 bit license.

Edit: I'd also like to add that I'm not aware of any reason why this method shouldn't work. However, that doesn't mean that there isn't one. While I know my way around a computer, I'm by no means an expert. I therefore suggest further research into the matter.
Yeah, I've been looking into that. WIll probably give it a try.

Although knowing my luck with computers it will probably all end in tears and shards of molten motherboard.
Don't forget to check if your hardware is even able to handle newer Windows versions. Microsoft offers apps that let you see if your system can run Windows 7 or 8. I tried installing 8 on an ancient PC I still had lying around and wasn't able to get past the formatting. Should have checked it before I wrecked it.
 

The Great Fungus

New member
Dec 9, 2013
19
0
0
bunnielovekins said:
ONLY 4 STARS FUCK YOU JIM BLARGH

Would be interested to find out if there's any tearing on the pc version - though I won't be getting it until the price goes way down.
Well, there's always tearing when your FPS output doesn't match your screen's refresh rate, no matter the game. V-sync does help there but it also reduces your frame rate.
MonkeyPunch said:
I'm really glad I got to play the beta because that's actually when I was more-or-less sure I was going to buy this game and the reviews aren't pointing out any downsides yet.
Same here. This game wasn't even on my radar before I signed up for the "open" PC-beta. Now I can't wait for it to be released in my region.
 

Snotnarok

New member
Nov 17, 2008
6,310
0
0
Reading it's like Call of Duty bugs me a bit-

The thing that makes Call of Duty what it is- is the killstreaks, these unmanned buffs that players get, with the higher ones being reserved for higher kills meaning the better players/better map remember-ers get to just suck in more and more kills because of their increasingly better unmanned kill machines while they are running around shooting as well at players often distracted by powerful killing machines above.

Yes Titans are giant monsters but they need a pilot to help them either inside or out or they're screwed, and EVERYONE GETS ONE. And they're not battle ruling- you don't just get 2 guns as a pilot, you get your primary, secondary and an anti-titan weapon- as in you have to take one. On top of that you can ride on the back of one, rip off a bit of metal and shoot at the mech's core- allowing you to bypass the regenerating shields and damage the armor directly. You can hack enemy robots or turrets to shoot at them as well, yes they're less effective than a pilot, but they do damage and distract, allowing you to do more damage.

Or hell, just call your titan down...on theirs and it's gone. So you are always involved with them or they'll be destroyed and now you're waiting another 3 minutes or so for another titan to ready up.

CoD you always had to have a class with an alt gun to shoot down killstreaks and even then you needed some form of teamwork...which simply doesn't work out well all the time.

Yes the guns are hitscan, but most games do that anyway as it's easier on server load, so it's nothing new, nothing CoD invented.

I went in expecting to hate it, I got a beta key and was like "ehh...it's gonna be like CoD where I just get annoyed at gunships appearing and shooting my face off every 15 minutes".
But no- I bloody preordered it and played it the second it released it was that convincing.
 

gorfias

Unrealistic but happy
Legacy
Apr 6, 2020
4,772
379
88
Country
USA
MonkeyPunch said:
Kimarous said:
Even if you list all the game's other qualities, it doesn't help the fact that it's online-only. In other words, something that amounts to a brick once the servers die off... or just flat-out die. Also, I have what's called a "life" wherein I need to pause regularly, so an online title that requires constant, undivided attention for extended periods is impractical and intrusive.

I'll admit that certain aspects do look somewhat enjoyable, but nothing that's worth $60 in my book.
Gorfias said:
Reminds me of Shadowrun. Me and a buddy were so pissed. $60 and no single player. There's just too many online shooters already for this to make me interested.

Let me know when PS4 gets its first Uncharted game.
I was just wondering. Do you two jump in to threads about inherently single player games and bemoan that there's no multiplayer?
Do you maybe subscribe to the idea that not every game (Second son for eg.) needs multiplayer? (and maybe frown when a publisher shoe-horns multiplayer in to a title that blatantly never needed it)

Do you go in to other multiplayer only games threads such as... dunno, Loadout, Planetside 2, Hearthstone, Guild Wars 2 etc. and bring up the same points?

///

I'm really glad I got to play the beta because that's actually when I was more-or-less sure I was going to buy this game and the reviews aren't pointing out any downsides yet.
Sure when the masses arrive (me amidst them) server might be shaky, but it all seems pretty smooth at the moment.
You're making my point for me. That's a lot of online multi player stuff you list there.

I guess I'm most pissed here, and with Shadowrun is that they came out at a time that platforms needed quality stuff and instead, they're pushing this stuff out.

An interesting question though: why don't I care if a game is single player only? I guess because, I can play it even if no one else is doing so. Multi-player? Not so much.
 

Elijah Newton

New member
Sep 17, 2008
456
0
0
Jim, kudos for a review which was both favorable and moderated expectations.

Anyone - any word on what the 360 version is going to be like? Is there some NDA expiration date that everyone's beholden to? Because given the hype of the xBone version I'm finding the radio silence regarding the 360's disheartening.

MonkeyPunch said:
Kimarous said:
Even if you list all the game's other qualities, it doesn't help the fact that it's online-only. In other words, something that amounts to a brick once the servers die off... or just flat-out die.
[snip]
Gorfias said:
I was just wondering. Do you two jump in to threads about inherently single player games and bemoan that there's no multiplayer?
Do you maybe subscribe to the idea that not every game (Second son for eg.) needs multiplayer? (and maybe frown when a publisher shoe-horns multiplayer in to a title that blatantly never needed it)
I like that you bring up the idea that multiplayer gets shoehorned into games that don't need it and, therefore, a multiplayer game shouldn't be criticized for not having a singleplayer game similarly shoehorned in.

That being said, I think these two made some solid points about multiplayer only games which frequently get glossed over : namely, this is a step closer to an extended rental of a game, rather than actually purchasing something you can independently enjoy.

I'm not making a value judgement. I'm not saying that's bad, or a waste of money. That's an individual call.

Personally - and I know this its a bit indirect - I see getting people to casually accept multiplayer only games (without access to server software, natch) as a way to erode opposition to always-on DRM. Because that's my take on it, it is a comfort to hear that other people aren't ok with multiplayer only.
 

tdylan

New member
Jun 17, 2011
381
0
0
Being an "online only" game with no single player to fall back on, and the striking similarity to "Brink," I'll hold off. Brink held so much promise IMO, but failed in some critical areas (balancing the bots. They became ultra lethal once you leveled up to a certain point), and the horrible lagging/disconnecting.

As much as I love giant fighting robots, and despite all the praise the game is getting, gonna opt to simply watch the forums to see what issues arise, if any.
 

42

Australian Justice
Jan 30, 2010
697
0
0
Kimarous said:
Recommendation: Does punching a robot with your robot sound like a good time?
Yes, but the Pacific Rim fighting game sucked regardless.

Even if you list all the game's other qualities, it doesn't help the fact that it's online-only. In other words, something that amounts to a brick once the servers die off... or just flat-out die. Also, I have what's called a "life" wherein I need to pause regularly, so an online title that requires constant, undivided attention for extended periods is impractical and intrusive.

I'll admit that certain aspects do look somewhat enjoyable, but nothing that's worth $60 in my book.
jesus christ dude, you make it sound like an MMO. it's not something you have to completely devote your life to. And to me it seems like the game will have a long life-span. And i'm not going to make too big of a thing here, but you are in the wrong hobby set if you play games and expect to have a life. I also think you need to play the game to be able to pass a judgement call like that. Yes i know its EA, and its online, but Respawn have created a top notch game. I have played the Beta, and it was fucking awesome.

Gotta agree with Jim on the map design. it's on Valve level for sure.
 

MonkeyPunch

New member
Feb 20, 2008
589
0
0
Gorfias said:
You're making my point for me. That's a lot of online multi player stuff you list there.

I guess I'm most pissed here, and with Shadowrun is that they came out at a time that platforms needed quality stuff and instead, they're pushing this stuff out.

An interesting question though: why don't I care if a game is single player only? I guess because, I can play it even if no one else is doing so. Multi-player? Not so much.
I'm certain I'm not at all making your point. If so, which?
(To be honest I think you're totally missing, or trying to evade my points.)

"...pushing this stuff out."?
"This" as in: quality MP shooters? ;]
You seem to have a problem with multiplayer in general, which still makes it weird that in a thread about a multiplayer game, you're criticising that it's well... multiplayer.
Online multiplayer game is online multiplayer.

And your final "question" isn't really interesting so much as it stating the obvious. Just like you can't play a multiplayer game when no one else is around - you can't play a single player game with other people. Erm, dur.
I think what you're trying to say is that you don't enjoy multiplayer - which is totally fine, but then this game was obviously never going to be for you.
There are however people out there who do enjoy multiplayer games and who don't need a shoddily tacked on single player experience just for the sake of and/or just to add another bullet point.
Respawn is relatively small and it took all their energy to make the game work in MP and there's no way they should have compromised the quality of the final product just to add single player.
 

sageoftruth

New member
Jan 29, 2010
3,417
0
0
Sounds great. The only thing standing in my way is that I never think to play online shooters during my free time (well, almost never). It would certainly be a waste of money if I never get around to playing it.
 

sageoftruth

New member
Jan 29, 2010
3,417
0
0
Kimarous said:
Recommendation: Does punching a robot with your robot sound like a good time?
Also, I have what's called a "life" wherein I need to pause regularly, so an online title that requires constant, undivided attention for extended periods is impractical and intrusive.
So, in other words, the only games you have time for are mobile phone games?
 

The Wooster

King Snap
Jul 15, 2008
15,305
0
0
tdylan said:
Being an "online only" game with no single player to fall back on, and the striking similarity to "Brink," I'll hold off.
The Bring comparison is apt, it's how I felt about the beta. "This is what Brink would have been if it wasn't terrible."
 

JUMBO PALACE

I'd Rather Be Squatting
Legacy
Jun 22, 2020
3,544
2
3
Country
USA
Downloaded the game late last night before bed from Amazon/Origin. Can't wait to get home and fire it up. I had a blast with the beta so needless to say I'm excited to see the rest of the content.

Didn't this review have a different title late last night? Something about Titan's Balls?
 

Jimothy Sterling

New member
Apr 18, 2011
5,976
0
0
42 said:
Kimarous said:
Recommendation: Does punching a robot with your robot sound like a good time?
Yes, but the Pacific Rim fighting game sucked regardless.

Even if you list all the game's other qualities, it doesn't help the fact that it's online-only. In other words, something that amounts to a brick once the servers die off... or just flat-out die. Also, I have what's called a "life" wherein I need to pause regularly, so an online title that requires constant, undivided attention for extended periods is impractical and intrusive.

I'll admit that certain aspects do look somewhat enjoyable, but nothing that's worth $60 in my book.
jesus christ dude, you make it sound like an MMO. it's not something you have to completely devote your life to. And to me it seems like the game will have a long life-span. And i'm not going to make too big of a thing here, but you are in the wrong hobby set if you play games and expect to have a life. I also think you need to play the game to be able to pass a judgement call like that. Yes i know its EA, and its online, but Respawn have created a top notch game. I have played the Beta, and it was fucking awesome.

Gotta agree with Jim on the map design. it's on Valve level for sure.

these are the people that made CoD. You are not expecting a yearly release cycle?

Titanfall: Ghost Ops 2 confirmed summer 2017.


no, seriously. I fully expect it to end up like CoD. It already plays just like it.


as for an MMO, you see, MMO means Massively Multiplayer Online.

Massively? maybe not, 6v6 and all, but I hear MOBA's are all the rage right now.

Multiplayer? slap yourself, that's all the game is.

Online? please, just eat your computer, that's the only thing this game has.


so two out of three? yep, it's an MMO.

at worst? it's a MOBA dressed up like a MMO.

now had it any type of singleplayer, even a training campaign like how Chromehounds had, then maybe you could claim it isn't an MMO.
 

Jimothy Sterling

New member
Apr 18, 2011
5,976
0
0
The Wooster said:
tdylan said:
Being an "online only" game with no single player to fall back on, and the striking similarity to "Brink," I'll hold off.
The Bring comparison is apt, it's how I felt about the beta. "This is what Brink would have been if it wasn't terrible."
TotalBiscuit's opinion is that Brink, despite its problems, did the multi-player campaign much better than Titanfall. Seems that the only thing that success/failure in a Titanfall campaign mission does is change the cut-scenes.

 

balladbird

Master of Lancer
Legacy
May 26, 2020
972
2
13
Country
United States
Gender
male
neonsword13-ops said:
inb4 accusations of Xbox fanboyism for giving a good score to an Xbox game and how giving 4/5 stars = "a bad score".
I was thinking the same thing as I read it. XD Managed to piss off both extremes of fan-dumb, the people who can't see past the exclusive sticker on a game, and the blowhards who spam hate on any review that lowers their beloved metacritic rating.

Ah well, the former may be somewhat assuaged by the fact that there is no competitive game on the other system to be ranked as well. Sort of like how his review of Deadly Premonition was lambasted for being higher than his rating of Heavy Rain. What the one game had to do with the other? fuck all if I know.

Good to see that some of the hype is merited, though this one doesn't sound interesting to me. Online multiplayer exclusive + first person is a formula that sounds tailor made for the kind of gamer I'm not. It'll be fun to see what the fans do with it, though.
 

themilo504

New member
May 9, 2010
731
0
0
I think that 60 bucks is too much for a multiplayer only game so I probably won?t get it until it becomes cheaper, still nice to know its good like I hoped.
 

DikkieDik

New member
Jun 14, 2010
13
0
0
I tried the beta and decided its not for me, i was bored after 5 minutes. I played for 2 hours because i really wanted to like this game, but theres too much going on for me. bots where u get almost nothing for are barely distinguishable with real players. I guess I have to wait longer before i can use my xbox one. I really liked ESO Beta on pc so maybe ill go for that on my one.
 

shadowstriker86

New member
Feb 12, 2009
2,159
0
0
Kimarous said:
Recommendation: Does punching a robot with your robot sound like a good time?
Yes, but the Pacific Rim fighting game sucked regardless.

Even if you list all the game's other qualities, it doesn't help the fact that it's online-only. In other words, something that amounts to a brick once the servers die off... or just flat-out die. Also, I have what's called a "life" wherein I need to pause regularly, so an online title that requires constant, undivided attention for extended periods is impractical and intrusive.

I'll admit that certain aspects do look somewhat enjoyable, but nothing that's worth $60 in my book.
Pretty much these reasons are why i haven't bought it. Dont get me wrong it's a fun game, but not worth 60$, 40 maybe but 30 is what i'd pay for something like this. I played the beta and had fun but got bored of it after a few hours because there was really nothing else to do. That's why TF2 is still my favorite FPS because of all the modes, classes and custom maps. Of course that's just me.
 

bjj hero

New member
Feb 4, 2009
3,180
0
0
Has anyone any idea what the 360 version is like? Im not ready to upgrade to a xbox one or a gaming rig.
 

Evonisia

Your sinner, in secret
Jun 24, 2013
3,258
0
0
Kalezian said:
42 said:
Kimarous said:
Recommendation: Does punching a robot with your robot sound like a good time?
Yes, but the Pacific Rim fighting game sucked regardless.

Even if you list all the game's other qualities, it doesn't help the fact that it's online-only. In other words, something that amounts to a brick once the servers die off... or just flat-out die. Also, I have what's called a "life" wherein I need to pause regularly, so an online title that requires constant, undivided attention for extended periods is impractical and intrusive.

I'll admit that certain aspects do look somewhat enjoyable, but nothing that's worth $60 in my book.
jesus christ dude, you make it sound like an MMO. it's not something you have to completely devote your life to. And to me it seems like the game will have a long life-span. And i'm not going to make too big of a thing here, but you are in the wrong hobby set if you play games and expect to have a life. I also think you need to play the game to be able to pass a judgement call like that. Yes i know its EA, and its online, but Respawn have created a top notch game. I have played the Beta, and it was fucking awesome.

Gotta agree with Jim on the map design. it's on Valve level for sure.

these are the people that made CoD. You are not expecting a yearly release cycle?

Titanfall: Ghost Ops 2 confirmed summer 2017.


no, seriously. I fully expect it to end up like CoD. It already plays just like it.
None of the Call of Duty games have less than a year's worth of development. Titanfall won't become yearly unless EA gets desperate or they bring in a second company to work on the series (like how Activision hired Treyarch to make CoD 3).
 

Vivi22

New member
Aug 22, 2010
2,300
0
0
Gorfias said:
I guess I'm most pissed here, and with Shadowrun is that they came out at a time that platforms needed quality stuff and instead, they're pushing this stuff out.
Implying that something multiplayer only can't be a quality product. Utterly absurd. Just because something isn't made to your tastes does not mean it has no value.
 

Shamanic Rhythm

New member
Dec 6, 2009
1,653
0
0
As with all multiplayer shooters, what really matters is whether the game is still fun and/or balanced a couple of months down the track when everyone has worked out what weapons/camping spots/perks/maps etc are the best or easiest to exploit.

It gets to a point where the time you have to invest just to have fun (where having 'fun' is defined as not being gibbed 5 seconds after spawning and not being yelled at constantly by aggro teammates for sucking) becomes incompatible with one or more of the following: sleep, relationship, work, exercise, social life.
 

42

Australian Justice
Jan 30, 2010
697
0
0
Kalezian said:
42 said:
Kimarous said:
Recommendation: Does punching a robot with your robot sound like a good time?
Yes, but the Pacific Rim fighting game sucked regardless.

Even if you list all the game's other qualities, it doesn't help the fact that it's online-only. In other words, something that amounts to a brick once the servers die off... or just flat-out die. Also, I have what's called a "life" wherein I need to pause regularly, so an online title that requires constant, undivided attention for extended periods is impractical and intrusive.

I'll admit that certain aspects do look somewhat enjoyable, but nothing that's worth $60 in my book.
jesus christ dude, you make it sound like an MMO. it's not something you have to completely devote your life to. And to me it seems like the game will have a long life-span. And i'm not going to make too big of a thing here, but you are in the wrong hobby set if you play games and expect to have a life. I also think you need to play the game to be able to pass a judgement call like that. Yes i know its EA, and its online, but Respawn have created a top notch game. I have played the Beta, and it was fucking awesome.

Gotta agree with Jim on the map design. it's on Valve level for sure.

these are the people that made CoD. You are not expecting a yearly release cycle?

Titanfall: Ghost Ops 2 confirmed summer 2017.


no, seriously. I fully expect it to end up like CoD. It already plays just like it.


as for an MMO, you see, MMO means Massively Multiplayer Online.

Massively? maybe not, 6v6 and all, but I hear MOBA's are all the rage right now.

Multiplayer? slap yourself, that's all the game is.

Online? please, just eat your computer, that's the only thing this game has.


so two out of three? yep, it's an MMO.

at worst? it's a MOBA dressed up like a MMO.

now had it any type of singleplayer, even a training campaign like how Chromehounds had, then maybe you could claim it isn't an MMO.
yeah thanks buddy, i was actually referencing the usual idea of MMOs, not the general definition, but yeah nah Massive game, Multiplayer, online, yeah it ticks all the boxes. I mean yeah sure it's also a battle arena. while we're on the topic of nailing the genre, you've completely missed my original point, which was he was making it sound like an MMO, which to my mind would've led any normal person to assume i was talking about something like WoW, SWTOR, Eve Online. And yeah sure by your definition TF2 is an MMO, Dota 2 is an MMO. but i digress, in the end it does not matter.

Will it go the CoD route? too early to tell. everyone is making assumptions on something that hasn't happened yet. yeah that sounds real good, lets all judge something over something that happened to another game franchise because you know thats not mental.
 

Aaron Sylvester

New member
Jul 1, 2012
786
0
0
Watching as Respawn's official forums start blowing with threads about balance, gameplay, etc.

I'll wait as the story unfolds (of the state of the game that is), and the eventual news of when Australian Azure servers will be released. Till then, I'm holding on to my money.

Huge fan of multiplayer shooters, but after BF4 (fuck you EA and DICE) I'm never again walking into another one without knowing absolutely EVERYTHING.
 

Johny64

New member
Feb 10, 2011
89
0
0
Kimarous said:
Recommendation: Does punching a robot with your robot sound like a good time?
Yes, but the Pacific Rim fighting game sucked regardless.
CORRECTION:
The Pacific Rim video game was about punching KAIJU with your robot. That makes all the difference.
 

8bitsuperhero

New member
Sep 12, 2008
23
0
0
I'm actually enjoying the game a whole lot, I didn't think it was going to be that great, but I've been having a ball even though I'm terrible at it.
 

godofallu

New member
Jun 8, 2010
1,663
0
0
I used to come to the Escapist for reviews due to the fact that they were in the form of 5 minute videos that showed gameplay and straight to the point appraisals. I could see the games with my own two eyes and compare my impressions with that of the reviewer.

I realize that video reviews take a lot more time, and hence they cost the Escapist more. But have you guys noticed a dip in views on your website? I know I haven't been tuning in nearly as often and I have to question if the lack of effort is actually a worthwhile strategy. Frankly I don't think you want to be gambling on the future of your website with reviews written in small font on a plain white background. You have no pictures or visual flair of any kind. It's boring.

This is the slam dunk super marketed game that people are craving content and attention on. Yet this is it? This is how you treat the most hyped game of the year?! You guys should be running streams of Escapist staff playing it. You guys should have video reviews. You guys should have articles or guides giving new player tips or how to dominate and get high scores. You should be basking in the overwhelming demand for Titanfall content and the easy money that brings. It saddens me that we have to give up great shows like Doraleous and Associates and other great things due to budget reasons. The money is right there if you would just reach out and take it. This is a gaming related website catering to nerd culture. This should be your bread and butter. This should be where you guys shine. It isn't.
 

Metalrocks

New member
Jan 15, 2009
2,406
0
0
8bitsuperhero said:
I'm actually enjoying the game a whole lot, I didn't think it was going to be that great, but I've been having a ball even though I'm terrible at it.
lol, im sure you play just fine. it also depends what weapons you have. so far the assault rifle is doing pretty fine and every now and then the smart pistol is as well. with the sniper i seam to suck a bit but to be hone3st, i hardly see any smipers. since it is a fast passed game.
so far i dint kill many pilots or even titans. my highest count so far are 2 titans and i think today i managed to kill 4 pilots. of course killing the minions/grunts i have a high count.
but still, im having a good time and im looking forward playing again tonight.
 

gorfias

Unrealistic but happy
Legacy
Apr 6, 2020
4,772
379
88
Country
USA
Vivi22 said:
Gorfias said:
I guess I'm most pissed here, and with Shadowrun is that they came out at a time that platforms needed quality stuff and instead, they're pushing this stuff out.
Implying that something multiplayer only can't be a quality product. Utterly absurd. Just because something isn't made to your tastes does not mean it has no value.
You have a good point. Someone above took me to task asking if I complain about single player only games, and I don't.
 

BrainBlow

New member
Jan 31, 2013
17
0
0
I'm waiting for the PC version,and even then I'll wait a while until the inevitable server failure problems are done with and the worst bugs are fixed.
 

Metalrocks

New member
Jan 15, 2009
2,406
0
0
BrainBlow said:
I'm waiting for the PC version,and even then I'll wait a while until the inevitable server failure problems are done with and the worst bugs are fixed.
but it is available on pc since the 10th. also no problems with the servers. unless you live in australia then i can understand that you would wait.
buts?! cant recall any. so far the game runs pretty smooth and havent come across any bugs that was a problem for me to play.
 

Falcon Stormvoice

New member
Apr 18, 2012
7
0
0
godofallu said:
This is the slam dunk super marketed game that people are craving content and attention on. Yet this is it? This is how you treat the most hyped game of the year?! You guys should be running streams of Escapist staff playing it. You guys should have video reviews. You guys should have articles or guides giving new player tips or how to dominate and get high scores.
In other words, they should be shilling and helping fuel the hype machine. Because money.
 

tautologico

e^(i * pi) + 1 = 0
Apr 5, 2010
725
0
0
I don't usually play multiplayer shooters, but I'm a sucker for sci-fi settings and mechs, so I bought it (which is rare, I only buy at launch about 1 game per year). The launch was smooth and I'm not experiencing bugs. It's really fun even though I suck at it, but I agree it could use more variety and the campaign is very weak. Gameplay is pretty solid and fun though.

Respawn is a small team compared with Infinity Ward and Treyarch, maybe they needed to prove the concept worked before doing more with it. Of course a sequel is basically a given but if Respawn does it, it'll take more than a year.
 

purf

New member
Nov 29, 2010
600
0
0
Yeaah..., I think I want this... hmm. But Origin has figured out where I live, so it's ?66,-?
However, very nice review.
 

TaboriHK

New member
Sep 15, 2008
811
0
0
I'm playing it on PC and I don't know how to talk about it without sounding like a plant or corporate schill. I dodged all the hype so I don't know how over the top it got, but it's an extremely replayable game that I'm absolutely terrible at, but love. Good times.
 

Uriain

New member
Apr 8, 2010
290
0
0
Kimarous said:
Recommendation: Does punching a robot with your robot sound like a good time?
Yes, but the Pacific Rim fighting game sucked regardless.

Even if you list all the game's other qualities, it doesn't help the fact that it's online-only. In other words, something that amounts to a brick once the servers die off... or just flat-out die. Also, I have what's called a "life" wherein I need to pause regularly, so an online title that requires constant, undivided attention for extended periods is impractical and intrusive.

I'll admit that certain aspects do look somewhat enjoyable, but nothing that's worth $60 in my book.
While completly understandable that a online only shooter doesn't fully capture your interest, and the correct assumption that when they kill the servers, they kill the game. I can say that most match's take anywhere from 8-15 min. I think the longest match I had was a 20 min game of attrition due to everyone ignoring the grunt fodder and trying to get player kills.

I enjoy the game, its quite fun once you get the hang of the wall jumping and if you are a veteran of Tribes (original), Unreal and Quake you will feel right at home with the speed. I think the "CoD with mech's" is a bit of a misnomer simply due to the negative connitations that being "CoD/related to CoD"

All in all a great review, I personally echo Jim's comments and would still recommend it to someone looking for a fun shooter which will have a pretty good shelf life.
 

Ohlookit'sMatty

New member
Sep 11, 2008
951
0
0
So it doesn't have a story campaign at all? Well then I'm out // Granted I was not going to buy this game at all but knowing that it is online multiplayer only is a no no for me

Mostly because I do not want to be subjected to the CoD(esk) players that are on it


-M
 

MeChaNiZ3D

New member
Aug 30, 2011
3,104
0
0
neonsword13-ops said:
inb4 accusations of Xbox fanboyism for giving a good score to an Xbox game and how giving 4/5 stars = "a bad score".
When has that ever happened here. I'll be surprised if one post in this thread is what you are claiming to be in before.
 

Dreiko_v1legacy

New member
Aug 28, 2008
4,696
0
0
Kimarous said:
Recommendation: Does punching a robot with your robot sound like a good time?
Yes, but the Pacific Rim fighting game sucked regardless.

Even if you list all the game's other qualities, it doesn't help the fact that it's online-only. In other words, something that amounts to a brick once the servers die off... or just flat-out die. Also, I have what's called a "life" wherein I need to pause regularly, so an online title that requires constant, undivided attention for extended periods is impractical and intrusive.

I'll admit that certain aspects do look somewhat enjoyable, but nothing that's worth $60 in my book.

How do you even enjoy any games if you have to keep pausing? Or, on that matter, do you not ever like, go to the movies or read a book or something? Having a life has nothing to do with being unable to focus your attention to a single thing without distractions and you ought to be able to do that if you wish to have meaning in that purported life that you have. If all you ever do is bits and pieces of things then you're not really making the best out of either thing. I find it is best to simply make some time in your schedule and devote it to specific activities rather than being in a persistent standby state never able to fully enjoy anything due to being interrupted all the time.
 

Kimarous

New member
Sep 23, 2009
2,011
0
0
Dreiko said:
Kimarous said:
Recommendation: Does punching a robot with your robot sound like a good time?
Yes, but the Pacific Rim fighting game sucked regardless.

Even if you list all the game's other qualities, it doesn't help the fact that it's online-only. In other words, something that amounts to a brick once the servers die off... or just flat-out die. Also, I have what's called a "life" wherein I need to pause regularly, so an online title that requires constant, undivided attention for extended periods is impractical and intrusive.

I'll admit that certain aspects do look somewhat enjoyable, but nothing that's worth $60 in my book.
How do you even enjoy any games if you have to keep pausing? Or, on that matter, do you not ever like, go to the movies or read a book or something? Having a life has nothing to do with being unable to focus your attention to a single thing without distractions and you ought to be able to do that if you wish to have meaning in that purported life that you have. If all you ever do is bits and pieces of things then you're not really making the best out of either thing. I find it is best to simply make some time in your schedule and devote it to specific activities rather than being in a persistent standby state never able to fully enjoy anything due to being interrupted all the time.
Reading WAY too much into things there. I knew I should have been more clear in my initial post.

What I meant is that I take care of a disabled person and need to be available at a moment's notice. It's not a perpetual thing, but I cannot afford to spend extended hours on games where I cannot pause. I rarely ever play online as a result, and the few times when I do, I specifically schedule those periods to time frames where interruption seems most unlikely.

Also, why the heck do people on this thread care so much about my personal gaming habits? If people are into Titanfall and it's ilk, good for you! I was simply expressing why the title doesn't appeal to me.
 

Mad World

Member
Legacy
Apr 23, 2020
795
0
1
Country
Canada
MonkeyPunch said:
Kimarous said:
Even if you list all the game's other qualities, it doesn't help the fact that it's online-only. In other words, something that amounts to a brick once the servers die off... or just flat-out die. Also, I have what's called a "life" wherein I need to pause regularly, so an online title that requires constant, undivided attention for extended periods is impractical and intrusive.

I'll admit that certain aspects do look somewhat enjoyable, but nothing that's worth $60 in my book.
Gorfias said:
Reminds me of Shadowrun. Me and a buddy were so pissed. $60 and no single player. There's just too many online shooters already for this to make me interested.

Let me know when PS4 gets its first Uncharted game.
I was just wondering. Do you two jump in to threads about inherently single player games and bemoan that there's no multiplayer?
Do you maybe subscribe to the idea that not every game (Second son for eg.) needs multiplayer? (and maybe frown when a publisher shoe-horns multiplayer in to a title that blatantly never needed it)

Do you go in to other multiplayer only games threads such as... dunno, Loadout, Planetside 2, Hearthstone, Guild Wars 2 etc. and bring up the same points?

///

I'm really glad I got to play the beta because that's actually when I was more-or-less sure I was going to buy this game and the reviews aren't pointing out any downsides yet.
Sure when the masses arrive (me amidst them) server might be shaky, but it all seems pretty smooth at the moment.
I agree. Some games simply don't need singleplayer. Battlefield comes to mind. Instead of wasting time with a bland, generic singleplayer story, Dice should have polished up the online... a lot more.