Titanfall Runs at 792p, 60 FPS on Xbox One

Recommended Videos

Robert Marrs

New member
Mar 26, 2013
454
0
0
792p! Welcome to the future people. Honestly if you are playing on a tv from a couch and not two feet away from a computer monitor you won't know the difference. Its just really sad that a $500 console that is supposed to be next gen is having trouble outputting resolutions that are in nearly every home in america by this point. Its troubling for the future more than anything if games that don't even look that next gen are already struggling to run. Hopefully this is just a development issue due to working with a new API.If not microsoft is going to have a lot of unhappy customers when the divide between ps4 and xbox one gets bigger.
 

TotalerKrieger

New member
Nov 12, 2011
376
0
0
Well, at least the rather anemic industry standard set by the next-gen consoles will carry on the possibility of not needing to upgrade my PC for the better part of a decade. I built my PC back in 2009 (I did pay about $850) and really don't feel the need to swap out any component as new releases still seems to run crisply at 1920x1080 w/ max to very high settings. Now is the time to jump into PC gaming if you are considering it, as the price to performance ratio for parts will really keep initial as well as long-term costs down to a minimum.
 

VonBrewskie

New member
Apr 9, 2009
480
0
0
GrinningCat said:
Not even 1080p? Pfffffft. Lame. Get it together, Xbox. Geez.

For clarification, I'm joking. I don't know what 1080p means and I don't particularly care either.

I just... I just wanted to join in on the bro-ing going on...
U wot m8?

Naw just kidding too. I'm actually still feeling the burn from Battlefield 4 so I decided not to buy this one. It's a sad decision for me too. I love giant robots! Oh well.
 

VonBrewskie

New member
Apr 9, 2009
480
0
0
Chaos Marine said:
Ha ha ha ha. I play all my PC games at 1920x1200. Doing so for the last couple of years (with every setting maxed too). So much for this generation's consoles being a match for high-end gaming computers.
I don't think these consoles are trying to match high-end PCs. They're trying to provide high-end gaming experiences to consumers without the hassle PCs can sometimes be and usually the associated costs. No need to link me examples of PCs built on the same budget as it costs to buy a console by the way. I've seen them. Most consumers just want to buy something and be done with it. Consoles (are supposed to, and for the most part do) offer high-end gaming experiences to consumers that don't want to build a computer and don't want to deal with video cards, drivers, operating systems etc etc etc. I have a nice rig. I am willing to build my PC and deal with the hassles. I like that part of it. The market seems to show that many consumers would rather just avoid a PC and grab a controller on a system they are already familiar with. Check out Yahtzee's video this week if you haven't. It's really good. Think it perfectly describes the situation consoles are finding themselves in right now.
 

zehydra

New member
Oct 25, 2009
5,029
0
0
Dark Knifer said:
We couldn't even make 1080p

How can cat videos on youtube achieve 1080p and a console from a gigantic corporation can't.
I'd guess it's because video game rendering requires more processing power, either with the CPU or GPU, than basic video.
 

ToastyMozart

New member
Mar 13, 2012
224
0
0
Colt47 said:
Like the idea for the game, but using Origin for the PC version kind of kills the deal for me. It's not like I hate all EA games, but they make it rather difficult for people who don't want multiple DRM storefronts on their PCs.
I'm just baffled that they somehow managed to licence the Source engine and NOT be contractually obligated to release it on Steam.
 

Bad Jim

New member
Nov 1, 2010
1,763
0
0
ToastyMozart said:
Colt47 said:
Like the idea for the game, but using Origin for the PC version kind of kills the deal for me. It's not like I hate all EA games, but they make it rather difficult for people who don't want multiple DRM storefronts on their PCs.
I'm just baffled that they somehow managed to licence the Source engine and NOT be contractually obligated to release it on Steam.
I don't think Valve could get away with that. There are many other quality engines that have no such requirements, and EA could easily make their own. EA might agree to license the Source engine, but they're not going to beg for it.
 
Mar 26, 2008
3,428
0
0
iseko said:
I wonder if it is a technical issue in the sense: the xbox one can't deliver high framrates at 1080p or if it is a weird design choice. Neither explanations sound very promising tbh.
It's not a hardware issue. Forza 5 does 1080p at 60fps. It's more about the devs being able to achieve it, which by the sounds of things is like trying to thread a camel through the eye of a needle. I'm not overly concerned; Titanfall is still a month from release.
 

KazeAizen

New member
Jul 17, 2013
1,129
0
0
Dark Knifer said:
We couldn't even make 1080p

How can cat videos on youtube achieve 1080p and a console from a gigantic corporation can't.
How come people still honestly care about this crap? Oh no its at 792p whatever will we do with ourselves? All sarcasm aside its articles like this that just make me shake my head at everything. All the graphics and HD in the world don't mean jack if you don't have a good aesthetic to the game. I'm getting this game for the 360 anyway. Only game I'm even remotely interested in that is coming out on the Xbox ONE and you put it on the 360? One less console being sold. It'll be fine and look nice when it finally comes out.
 

Mr.Squishy

New member
Apr 14, 2009
1,989
0
0
Pros: Awesome concept, seems like it plays smoothly, good resolution/fps.
Cons: Xbone exclusive.
I'm having a moral dilemma here.
 

KazeAizen

New member
Jul 17, 2013
1,129
0
0
VonBrewskie said:
Chaos Marine said:
Ha ha ha ha. I play all my PC games at 1920x1200. Doing so for the last couple of years (with every setting maxed too). So much for this generation's consoles being a match for high-end gaming computers.
I don't think these consoles are trying to match high-end PCs. They're trying to provide high-end gaming experiences to consumers without the hassle PCs can sometimes be and usually the associated costs. No need to link me examples of PCs built on the same budget as it costs to buy a console by the way. I've seen them. Most consumers just want to buy something and be done with it. Consoles (are supposed to, and for the most part do) offer high-end gaming experiences to consumers that don't want to build a computer and don't want to deal with video cards, drivers, operating systems etc etc etc. I have a nice rig. I am willing to build my PC and deal with the hassles. I like that part of it. The market seems to show that many consumers would rather just avoid a PC and grab a controller on a system they are already familiar with. Check out Yahtzee's video this week if you haven't. It's really good. Think it perfectly describes the situation consoles are finding themselves in right now.
You speak the truth. I'm just finally going to start building my own rig and if not that at least get an Alienware laptop so I can run League of Legends better than my Mac can (very long story there). I think me and Yahtzee are both kind of sad that the one console this generation that is a dedicated games machine is not selling all that well. Its not fair to me and its like the whole "nice guys finish last" thing. I honestly wished the Xbone had flopped instead. Nothing on the horizon of interest to me for it and Titanfall is going to be on the 360. PS4 has my Kingdom Hearts 3 so there is literally nothing there for me.
 

medv4380

The Crazy One
Feb 26, 2010
672
5
23
792p? No monitor, or TV will support that resolution nativly. At 792p it will look bad on every LCD monitor ever made. It should have been trimmed down to 720p or letter boxed in 1080p. Otherwise it will just be wrong.
 

Evonisia

Your sinner, in secret
Jun 24, 2013
3,256
0
0
Don't care. So long as the game is fun the level of care I could give for p or fps is terribly low.
 

DarkhoIlow

New member
Dec 31, 2009
2,529
0
0
Mr.Squishy said:
Pros: Awesome concept, seems like it plays smoothly, good resolution/fps.
Cons: Xbone exclusive.
I'm having a moral dilemma here.
Here's the solution for your dilemma = play it on the PC.
 

Dark Knifer

New member
May 12, 2009
4,467
0
0
KazeAizen said:
Dark Knifer said:
We couldn't even make 1080p

How can cat videos on youtube achieve 1080p and a console from a gigantic corporation can't.
How come people still honestly care about this crap? Oh no its at 792p whatever will we do with ourselves? All sarcasm aside its articles like this that just make me shake my head at everything. All the graphics and HD in the world don't mean jack if you don't have a good aesthetic to the game. I'm getting this game for the 360 anyway. Only game I'm even remotely interested in that is coming out on the Xbox ONE and you put it on the 360? One less console being sold. It'll be fine and look nice when it finally comes out.
Because better graphics matter to some people? People who are interested in technology and plus the better graphics and frames the consoles can manage the easier it would be to port and 1080p is pretty much the standard on TV these days so they should meet that.

I do agree aesthetic is more important but some aesthetics work best with great hardware, such as a large sandbox and what not.

It's not really a huge deal but it would be nice to meet the benchmark of standard on televisions with standardised hardware.
 

Evonisia

Your sinner, in secret
Jun 24, 2013
3,256
0
0
DarkhoIlow said:
Mr.Squishy said:
Pros: Awesome concept, seems like it plays smoothly, good resolution/fps.
Cons: Xbone exclusive.
I'm having a moral dilemma here.
Here's the solution for your dilemma = play it on the PC.
Pros: The benefits of PC gaming.
Cons: You have to download Origin.

At this rate it's just wait a few months for the Xbox 360 port.
 

DarkhoIlow

New member
Dec 31, 2009
2,529
0
0
Evonisia said:
DarkhoIlow said:
Mr.Squishy said:
Pros: Awesome concept, seems like it plays smoothly, good resolution/fps.
Cons: Xbone exclusive.
I'm having a moral dilemma here.
Here's the solution for your dilemma = play it on the PC.
Pros: The benefits of PC gaming.
Cons: You have to download Origin.

At this rate it's just wait a few months for the Xbox 360 port.
Origin is barely a con. I played a few EA games through the past 2 years and I never had trouble with Origin crashes (Mass Effect 3 and Battlefield 3 were the games I played on Origin).

Let's not forget the M&K which is quite a big pro when playing shooters.
 

KazeAizen

New member
Jul 17, 2013
1,129
0
0
Dark Knifer said:
KazeAizen said:
How come people still honestly care about this crap? Oh no its at 792p whatever will we do with ourselves? All sarcasm aside its articles like this that just make me shake my head at everything. All the graphics and HD in the world don't mean jack if you don't have a good aesthetic to the game. I'm getting this game for the 360 anyway. Only game I'm even remotely interested in that is coming out on the Xbox ONE and you put it on the 360? One less console being sold. It'll be fine and look nice when it finally comes out.
Because better graphics matter to some people? People who are interested in technology and plus the better graphics and frames the consoles can manage the easier it would be to port and 1080p is pretty much the standard on TV these days so they should meet that.

I do agree aesthetic is more important but some aesthetics work best with great hardware, such as a large sandbox and what not.

It's not really a huge deal but it would be nice to meet the benchmark of standard on televisions with standardised hardware.
I'm interested in technology but pretty much the whole of the internet has me so burned out on the thing that when I'm sitting in virtual environments classes at school I begin to roll my eyes when they start mentioning this kind of stuff. I shouldn't be burned out on it to the point that I want to get up and rant about this crap in my class. In my opinion we should've just buckled down with the leash Nintendo put on us with their Wii U since it is as powerful as a 360 and PS3 and quite frankly between those games and everything I'm seeing for new generation I can't really tell a lick of difference. None at all. The fact that people continue to flip their lids over this just boggles my mind. Unless it is visibly affecting gameplay or the in game experience in a negative way we really shouldn't care.

Can you tell I'm burned right the heck out on this subject?
 

Dark Knifer

New member
May 12, 2009
4,467
0
0
KazeAizen said:
Fair enough, the internet does that to things. It's not a huge deal, certainly not "anything less then 4k is not a game, its a rock with some carvings on it" or something silly like that.

I'll just say, the movie your avatar is based benefitted greatly from advances in technology so gaming should also be looking to advance, but it's not the most important thing next to story and of course gameplay.

I think we can both agree with that.
 

ToastyMozart

New member
Mar 13, 2012
224
0
0
Evonisia said:
Pros: The benefits of PC gaming.
Cons: You have to download Origin.

At this rate it's just wait a few months for the Xbox 360 port.
Origin's not fantastic, but it's not so horrible that it's worth buying it on 360 if you already have a capable PC. If it's because you can't trust EA as far as you could throw them like me, you could always run it in a sandbox like I do.