I appreciate that somebody cleared that up. Thanks. If you wouldn't have... I might have stepped up and attempting to sweep it up myself.Matronadena said:in shri lanka it's Buddhists that are actually oppressed...even worse than the Tibetan's in some cases. having temples with hundreds, of not thousands of years of records, lessons, and other artifacts destroyed, most of their temples are little more than skeleton ruins after being blown to bits, many of their brothers and sisters shot to death and tortured by state police for leading a demonstration march....Agema said:Even supposedly peaceful Buddhists will fight or have - such as in Sri Lanka - oppressed others.
However I want to make it clear, though there is a big issue to do no harm to any living thing, there is also no defined rule of if, and when physical retaliation are allowed... that has always been debated...Tibetan monks , and sri-lankin monks both are at a point in their being punished for who and what they are, that some of them say it's time to fight back physically, and others stating that no physical battle should ever be resorted to, and that there are other means.
fighting to save the life of others.. or as the jedi would say " for defense, never for attack" is a question that many are left out to open....last thing a buddhist is interested in is power, and wealth....as the whole philosophy is centered of the selfless, and easing of suffering... but thats not to say that in history there have been those who USE the banner of a monk to inflict suffering...even the famed sohei of Japan, were ( in the majority) really not true monks, though their name means " warrior monk" most of them were mercenaries who came together and established a private army and offered their hand to which ever Daimyo would pay the highest to the " temple"
so there HAS been cases of Buddhists entering battle....but it's not something taken lightly at all, and it's stressed that the burdens an individual will take on for taking such actions, are not to be underestimated.
to find the self, is to loose the self, to loose the self is to be enlightened by ten thousand things...
You're starting to piss me off. Do not call my God shitty. Carbon-dating is inaccurate, it's a well known fact, search for it on the internet. If you're too lazy then don't respond, with a bullshit comment, as seems to be your initial instinct. And enough with the "hard-core", "casual" religious stereotype. I think everything in the bible can be taken literally, as for attacks on abortion clinics...well I think that anyone who enforces abortions, maybe should have been aborted themselves.bjj hero said:You'll see I was referring to fundamentalist Christians. The ones who believe that the whole bible is a historical document with each line being fact, no metaphor to be seen. They are out there, believing fossils carbon date more than 10,000 years old (older than the earth according to the old testaments literal interpretation) as a test from god. Thats a pretty shitty god who'll try to trick you into not believing in him so he can send you to hell.ExaltedK9 said:Ok, well what christians say that dinsaurs didn't exist? And I hope you don't mean literal bombing of abortion clinics, although I'm am completely opposed to it myself. And can you really say that you agree with everything your government says? Some things are petitioned for the best.bjj hero said:I imagine Buddhists would vote for Buddhist, as am I.cuddly_tomato said:Does being an atheist mean that you can't be religious?
Aren't Buddhists atheists?
Id quite like the fundamentalist Christians with the earth is less than 10000 years old and fossils are a test of faith stuff... If they werent constantly trying inflict their beliefs on the rest of us, petitioning the government, pushid ID in schools, bombin abortion clinics etc.
It does take real effort to ignore evidence like that.
ehh...I'm pretty sure that the bible makes some referrences to dinosaurs, I'm not feeling like looking it up now though. I'm not sure what christians you hang around with, that "inflict" their beliefs on you, but Most of my christian friends never force it on me, and are unerstanding. I respect them for sharing their beliefs though, and when you think about it, if you thought your beliefs were the only way to heaven, than you would have to hate someone pretty badly to not want to share it with them.
Im well aware that there are moderate Christians out there. they were not the people I was talking about. There are Extremist Christians who have attacked abortion clinics and staff in America. Do a quick search or if you're too lazy try here [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-abortion_violence].
I have no bother with Christians as individuals. Im not trying to convert anyone to atheism, I just want the same respect in return. It does bother me when they lobby the government based on what some book says. Example gays getting married. Does it really affect you whether someone else can get married? Gays have the same right to be miserable as the rest of us. Or when the pope says that promoting contraception in Africa is dangerous. Hes really not helping.
You're god is big enough and old enough to stand up for himself. Don't get all upset because he's forcing you to question your faith. It's exactly what religious people do when they try to convert you.ExaltedK9 said:You're starting to piss me off. Do not call my God shitty. Carbon-dating is inaccurate, it's a well known fact, search for it on the internet. If you're too lazy then don't respond, with a bullshit comment, as seems to be your initial instinct. And enough with the "hard-core", "casual" religious stereotype. I think everything in the bible can be taken literally, as for attacks on abortion clinics...well I think that anyone who enforces abortions, maybe should have been aborted themselves.bjj hero said:You'll see I was referring to fundamentalist Christians. The ones who believe that the whole bible is a historical document with each line being fact, no metaphor to be seen. They are out there, believing fossils carbon date more than 10,000 years old (older than the earth according to the old testaments literal interpretation) as a test from god. Thats a pretty shitty god who'll try to trick you into not believing in him so he can send you to hell.
Im well aware that there are moderate Christians out there. they were not the people I was talking about. There are Extremist Christians who have attacked abortion clinics and staff in America. Do a quick search or if you're too lazy try here [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-abortion_violence].
I have no bother with Christians as individuals. Im not trying to convert anyone to atheism, I just want the same respect in return. It does bother me when they lobby the government based on what some book says. Example gays getting married. Does it really affect you whether someone else can get married? Gays have the same right to be miserable as the rest of us. Or when the pope says that promoting contraception in Africa is dangerous. Hes really not helping.
That may be wrong of me to say, but it seems fair enough....And I've never really liked the pope. Well feel free to pick apart that statement, I'm too tired to add the rest right now.
Yea? Where do you get those numbers? And yea I've questioned my own faith, I wasn't always a christian, I didn't come out of the womb holding a bible, as you might beleive. And such is the case with most christians. I'll defend God when I can, as you must do the same with your values, and beleifs.Daveman said:You're god is big enough and old enough to stand up for himself. Don't get all upset because he's forcing you to question your faith. It's exactly what religious people do when they try to convert you.ExaltedK9 said:You're starting to piss me off. Do not call my God shitty. Carbon-dating is inaccurate, it's a well known fact, search for it on the internet. If you're too lazy then don't respond, with a bullshit comment, as seems to be your initial instinct. And enough with the "hard-core", "casual" religious stereotype. I think everything in the bible can be taken literally, as for attacks on abortion clinics...well I think that anyone who enforces abortions, maybe should have been aborted themselves.bjj hero said:You'll see I was referring to fundamentalist Christians. The ones who believe that the whole bible is a historical document with each line being fact, no metaphor to be seen. They are out there, believing fossils carbon date more than 10,000 years old (older than the earth according to the old testaments literal interpretation) as a test from god. Thats a pretty shitty god who'll try to trick you into not believing in him so he can send you to hell.
Im well aware that there are moderate Christians out there. they were not the people I was talking about. There are Extremist Christians who have attacked abortion clinics and staff in America. Do a quick search or if you're too lazy try here [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-abortion_violence].
I have no bother with Christians as individuals. Im not trying to convert anyone to atheism, I just want the same respect in return. It does bother me when they lobby the government based on what some book says. Example gays getting married. Does it really affect you whether someone else can get married? Gays have the same right to be miserable as the rest of us. Or when the pope says that promoting contraception in Africa is dangerous. Hes really not helping.
That may be wrong of me to say, but it seems fair enough....And I've never really liked the pope. Well feel free to pick apart that statement, I'm too tired to add the rest right now.
Don't insult my Carbon Dating. It's a billion times more reliable than one of the most obviously biased historical texts known to mankind.
Oh, the "billion", yeah, I made that up. But radioactive decay can be scientifically proven and a huge amount of technology is based on it. The Bible can not be proven as such.ExaltedK9 said:Yea? Where do you get those numbers? And yea I've questioned my own faith, I wasn't always a christian, I didn't come out of the womb holding a bible, as you might beleive. And such is the case with most christians. I'll defend God when I can, as you must do the same with your values, and beleifs.Daveman said:You're god is big enough and old enough to stand up for himself. Don't get all upset because he's forcing you to question your faith. It's exactly what religious people do when they try to convert you.
Don't insult my Carbon Dating. It's a billion times more reliable than one of the most obviously biased historical texts known to mankind.
Yeah, I didn't even write that. But yes, crazy wackjobs, I concur.apsycogerbil said:daveman i think those fundamentalists you are speaking of are actually the mormons (crazy bunch of wackjobs lol)
Well thank you for asuming my past is of a christian background. No I've had atheism pushed down my throat all my life, maybe you're just too damn jusgemental for your own good. The bible is solid, people have been asking the same question for hundreds of years, "what if the bible is inaccurate?" It's not if your are gonna make a stetement like that one, you need to know how things were back then.Daveman said:Oh, the "billion", yeah, I made that up. But radioactive decay can be scientifically proven and a huge amount of technology is based on it. The Bible can not be proven as such.ExaltedK9 said:Yea? Where do you get those numbers? And yea I've questioned my own faith, I wasn't always a christian, I didn't come out of the womb holding a bible, as you might beleive. And such is the case with most christians. I'll defend God when I can, as you must do the same with your values, and beleifs.Daveman said:You're god is big enough and old enough to stand up for himself. Don't get all upset because he's forcing you to question your faith. It's exactly what religious people do when they try to convert you.
Don't insult my Carbon Dating. It's a billion times more reliable than one of the most obviously biased historical texts known to mankind.
You may not have come out of the womb holding a bible but I bet you were slightly more exposed to christianity than other religions or any atheistic beliefs.Yeah, I didn't even write that. But yes, crazy wackjobs, I concur.apsycogerbil said:daveman i think those fundamentalists you are speaking of are actually the mormons (crazy bunch of wackjobs lol)
To be fair, a lot of atheists have lived with the same sense of persecution. In a Christian-dominated Western culture, atheists have been the minority for a long time. It's a built-in response for atheists to be ready to fight back against the constant pressure for them to "stop being Godless heathens" or whatever the stereotype tag line is.ExaltedK9 said:Well thank you for asuming my past is of a christian background. No I've had atheism pushed down my throat all my life, maybe you're just too damn jusgemental for your own good. The bible is solid, people have been asking the same question for hundreds of years, "what if the bible is inaccurate?" It's not if your are gonna make a stetement like that one, you need to know how things were back then.
Well I call individuals like I see them but, christians who would lump atheists together and classify them all as "godless heathens" isn't what would pass for normal christian behavior in my eyes.The Shade said:To be fair, a lot of atheists have lived with the same sense of persecution. In a Christian-dominated Western culture, atheists have been the minority for a long time. It's a built-in response for atheists to be ready to fight back against the constant pressure for them to "stop being Godless heathens" or whatever the stereotype tag line is.ExaltedK9 said:Well thank you for asuming my past is of a christian background. No I've had atheism pushed down my throat all my life, maybe you're just too damn jusgemental for your own good. The bible is solid, people have been asking the same question for hundreds of years, "what if the bible is inaccurate?" It's not if your are gonna make a stetement like that one, you need to know how things were back then.
Of course, now that atheism is massively on the rise, the tables are turning. It will be a while for that natural defensiveness to mellow out.
Agema said:I think you'll find it's the Hindu Tamils who were oppressed. That's why they rebelled a decade or three ago. The rebellion's just been defeated in the last month.Matronadena said:in shri lanka it's Buddhists that are actually oppressed...even worse than the Tibetan's in some cases.Agema said:Even supposedly peaceful Buddhists will fight or have - such as in Sri Lanka - oppressed others.
Buddhists make up about 75% of the Sri Lankan population. I'm not clear how a democratically-elected government can manage to oppress 75% of their own electorate and keep their jobs. The fact that the government, not so long ago, tried to make Buddhism the official religion of Sri Lanka also suggests it's not an oppressed religion there.