Sentience isn't a subjective concept, it's merely the ability to feel or perceive. Sapient is more subjective in that it requires a high level of intelligence.IamLEAM1983 said:I'd be open to us finding nothing except alien bacteria for a while. Baby steps, y'know?Lightknight said:If it's just life in general then I'd expect it within just a few years since that opens things up to even just bacteria.
Sentient life though? That's what I think really matters to us. Non-sentient life might as well be just another strange species we found in the rain forest.
As far as sentience goes, isn't that a subjective concept? If we find a group of beings that are actually sapient but that don't fit our observable criteria for it, we're liable to miss 'em entirely.
However, I wouldn't consider it subjective enough to allow something to fall through the cracks. We really just want to see complex forms of communication and tool use or construction beyond the basics that our animals can accomplish. There is some gray area between animals and sapience where we would dismiss them as non-sapient albeit very smart animals but anything with that little sapience would have very little to teach us that we didn't already learn from our animals and ourselves when we crossed that threshold.
What we really want are people we can collaborate with and learn from. Not a species we recognize as the equivalent of a 13 year old.