Trailers: Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3: Redemption Trailer
- Thread starter Team Hollywood
- Start date
I know the gameplay with be largely the same. I know the graphics will be EXACTLY the same. I know that probably none of the few changes will actually be fixing any of the problems with the series and that I'm probably a fool who deserves to have his wallet raped by the corporations.
But right now I couldn't give a shit. I want this. I want this bad.
But right now I couldn't give a shit. I want this. I want this bad.
This made me LOLDoctorFrankenStein said:
hahahaha you mean survival right? zombies is treyarch's thing.
OT: this game looks a whole shit load more fun the Battlefield 3's campaign. apparently BF3 (according to previews i have read) is just a conventional modern shooter. well the campaign anyway. But you gotta admit, CoD at least puts the effort into their single player as well as the multiplayer.
I gotta say, I'm pretty damn stoked about this game. Pretty damn stoked. Big set-pieces, linear levels and facial-hair driven bad-assery don't fail me now!
Great trailer, but I'm concerned about the abnormally low quality that the Escapist put out for it.
I like the absolutely pointless monologues in this trailer. Just like the MW2 SP trailer, talking about Cain and Able for some unrelated reason.
Guess that's to be expected from the game that looks the exact same.
Guess that's to be expected from the game that looks the exact same.
That's exactly it. I'm not so jazzed about just shooting other people with guns but shooting zombies I like. Plus I'd rather work with a couple of people against the computer rather then against another group.42 said:
That last level; 'Moon' is controller-mangling-ly difficult, but the dialogue has only gotten better. I wish they'd string the maps together with some extra objectives and cut-scenes and make it a stand-alone game with a multi-player aspect. The story is actually pretty good, it's just hard to get at.
Nope, I thought it was awesome, too. Maybe not quite as good as CoD4, but certainly a worthy successor.MiracleOfSound said:
Modern Warfare 1's campaign was great, but imo, 2 was average -> bad. The best bits about MW1 were the small task-force based SAS missions - and with every game they go towards bigger and bigger combats, which is just so generic. Inserting onto the ship in the first mission, or blowing your way through the plane in the epilogue were some of the best bits! More small-scale stuff..
pass, ive already played it with cod4 and mw2, im NOT been suckered out of another £40 just to play the same stuff again, and get bord of the same repetative mp games over and over again. Have fun
Totally agreed! I've rewatched it a lot of times now, and it's always as epic as the last time. And yes, I too thought MW2 had a very adrenaline-pumping campaign filled with epic moments and I loved it.Frozen Donkey Wheel2 said:
You're right, that's why I'm buying it for the campaign and Spec Ops, oh... and the new Survival Mode.silverbullet1989 said:
Oh yes, MW does have offline modes, contrary to popular belief. And they're also very underrated.
Yep. CoD doesn't got 99 problems and a ***** ain't one, either ;pSizzle Montyjing said:
In all seriousness though, IW and even Acti have been astonishingly classy in how well they've handled the seemingly endless stream of childish taunts from DICE/EA. Though really maybe they knew they wouldn't have to all along; the "99 Problems" trailer was utter shit compared to this, even the BF stans I know hated it, and the open beta was a mistake on BF3's part in that it revealed that the graphics in those trailers aren't anything even remotely like what the game is going to look like on a console. I dled the BF3 beta for the PS3 on the first day, and aside from a few nice shadow effects it wasn't a noticeable improvement on MW2 in any respect whatsoever. Crysis 2's MP looks considerably better.
It was a lot of fun, to be sure, but after watching all those misleading trailers about the awesomeness of the new Frostbite engine, I feel cheated. I'm not paying $2500 for a PC with top specs just to play Battlefield.
I would seem that the old adages about one's bark versus their bite are true yet again.