Trailers: Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 - Weapon Proficiencies

Deadyawn

New member
Jan 25, 2011
823
0
0
You know, I don't really have much of a problem with CoD. I played it on the steam demo weekend thing and I can see why it's so popular. I also don't have much experience with it so forgive me if I'm wrong when I say that that gameplay footage looked EXACTLY the same as Black Ops. I could see no difference at all. Can't we get a little variation?
 

Lenin211

New member
Apr 22, 2011
423
0
0
Wicky_42 said:
Hey, cod 4's gotten another expansion! *sigh*

at least BF series has a little more going on than just reiterating last years' game with a handful of new guns and a reorganisation of the same perks -_-
Wow, I'm impressed with the escapist community. It took halfway down the first page for a pissy, brand loyal, battlefield fanboy to whine about the new modern warfare.

OT: I think that this could add depth to the multiplayer, It might also unbalance the game. While I admit that the skilled players have always had better weapons and perks than new players, now they can have guns that have massive advantages. It depends on how they implement this feature that will determine if it is fair or not.
 

Wicky_42

New member
Sep 15, 2008
2,468
0
0
Lenin211 said:
Wicky_42 said:
Hey, cod 4's gotten another expansion! *sigh*

at least BF series has a little more going on than just reiterating last years' game with a handful of new guns and a reorganisation of the same perks -_-
Wow, I'm impressed with the escapist community. It took halfway down the first page for a pissy, brand loyal, battlefield fanboy to whine about the new modern warfare.

OT: I think that this could add depth to the multiplayer, It might also unbalance the game. While I admit that the skilled players have always had better weapons and perks than new players, now they can have guns that have massive advantages. It depends on how they implement this feature that will determine if it is fair or not.
Oh no! Someone drawing a criticism from a valid observation that he is challenged on and is able to support with evidence and reference! Now, what does that make you, hmm? Hypocritical much?