Really?NLS said:Last two id games were shit sandwich? The last game id developed was Doom 3 back in 2004 (yeah okay that one may count as shit), but Quake 3 wasn't so bad. Quake IV, Wolfenstein etc. weren't developed by id software.
How would they know? It only says it in the video. >_>iniudan said:Patrick_and_the_ricks said:That looks a lot like Fallout. Gameplay looks decent, but Bethesda is going to get quick a bit of flak.You two do know that the game is published by Bethesda ?Black Watch said:Flak for what? Bethesda has nothing to do with the game, this is all ID right here.
Quake IV and Wolfenstein were Raven. Enemy Territory: Quake Wars was Splash Damage. Doom III was Id's last game. They started working on Rage about the same time Bethesda started working on Fallout 3. Id has put a lot into the game. Everyone who has had their hands on it wants more. Look arounf for some of the E3 info. If you read up and watch the footage I think you'll be planning on buying this one. I am.Namewithheld said:Really?NLS said:Last two id games were shit sandwich? The last game id developed was Doom 3 back in 2004 (yeah okay that one may count as shit), but Quake 3 wasn't so bad. Quake IV, Wolfenstein etc. weren't developed by id software.
...I could have sworn Quake IV was ID's. Huh.
Well, I still thought Doom 3 was eh.
There is the way the ennemies moves like it was show on e3... very impressive they really use the environement against you...Wicky_42 said:Wellllll, you can't get much more generic and brown setting wise. Very much Gears of War meets Fallout as far as I can see. What makes it special/worth getting when I'll be full of BF3 and Deus Ex? I just don't see what makes it particularly interesting, especially after the phenomenal marketing of Deus Ex and the impressive gameplay trailers of BF3. They need to step up their game if they want to attract the attention of perhaps the more discerning gamer, but I'd expect them to be able to shift it well enough if they buy some decent reviews. Not looking like series material atm though.
Yeah, I vaguely recalled something like that, and being impressed at the AI's occasional retreats and maneuvers - and then being disappointed as they stuck out of the cover they took and didn't react as they were filled with bullets as they were 'hiding'. However, on the weight of this trailer, as someone who's not been picking through all the background, it got a resounding 'meh'. Especially compared to the continuous 'wow's BF and Deus Ex have been giving me.Talvrae said:There is the way the ennemies moves like it was show on e3... very impressive they really use the environement against you...Wicky_42 said:Wellllll, you can't get much more generic and brown setting wise. Very much Gears of War meets Fallout as far as I can see. What makes it special/worth getting when I'll be full of BF3 and Deus Ex? I just don't see what makes it particularly interesting, especially after the phenomenal marketing of Deus Ex and the impressive gameplay trailers of BF3. They need to step up their game if they want to attract the attention of perhaps the more discerning gamer, but I'd expect them to be able to shift it well enough if they buy some decent reviews. Not looking like series material atm though.
At the QuakeCon 2011, John Carmack said that "there is really no any news" on Doom 4 and that he wanted to devote this year solely to RAGE. He also mentined that Doom 4 will be using a new scripting language that is based off C++ and called it "super-script". This so called "super-script" is a subset of C++ with features like "scheduling", "full performance" and "type safe". Carmack added that once RAGE ships, it's development team will move to Doom 4 - to speed up on that project.Doom 4 might also feature dedicated servers unlike RAGE.