The problem is Michael 'Explosionsaresexy' Bay. If a film insults my inteligence at least make it funny.
I was not actually bothered by the aesthetic (although the recent games show how much better they could be), I was more bothered by their annoying behaviour. They are supposed to be a part of a technologically advanced race, but they are a pair of blundering idiots, purely included for supposed comic relief. They are the Jar Jar Binks of Transformers.Wicky_42 said:You know, it wasn't until you posted that picture, I'd never really properly understood the complaints about the bayformers' aesthetic... after actually looking at those two for a minute it's pretty obvious what a fucking mess the designs are - just a jumble of polygons with no cohesion, rhythm or style. Impressive to be able to fuck up giant robots right from the get-go - who on the design team looked at these and went "yeah, that looks awesome!" ?Legion said:Good job I scrolled up before pressing post, you said exactly what I did.The Human Torch said:Maybe this has to do with the fact that if you already launched a Transformers action figure two times prior for each movie, most kids will already OWN an Optimus Prime figure and will want something else. No matter how good/bad your movies are, not many kids will buy the same action figure twice.
Although if this is the kind of logic that leads to them creating new characters, just to sell some toys (as opposed to making the actual film good) then it's an idiotic idea.
At any rate:
I think that's the crucial issue. If you are going to make a popcorn flick with no ounce of intelligence then it still needs to be entertaining.Evil Smurf said:The problem is Michael 'Explosionsaresexy' Bay. If a film insults my inteligence at least make it funny.
Yup. I'm a Transformer collector, and I've got a few of em.loa said:There are actually action figures of bay transformers, those new hilariously complicated looking things of which the villains are completely indiscernible?
Of course, because we all know that the kiddies love to watch robots urinating on famous actors, robot leg humping, dogs humping, Fembot rape assassins and a plethora of endless unfunny sexual and racist jokes.Dryk said:Wait... they were aiming these movies as kids?... what...
It'll still be an issue. As a kid I never saw the movie, being poor and in the boonies. For me one episode ended with Optimus and the next one started with Rodimus. I don't think I watched it much after that, though I don't remember why. Maybe it was because of the change, maybe it was because, well, Rodimus was kinda douchey.Space Jawa said:If he's not present to begin with, I don't think the lack of Optimus in and of itself should be nearly the same kind of issue.
Mortuorum said:I just threw up in my mouth a little.
Don't forget the giant robot scrotum in Revenge of the Fallen!Tank207 said:Of course, because we all know that the kiddies love to watch robots urinating on famous actors, robot leg humping, dogs humping, Fembot rape assassins and a plethora of endless unfunny sexual and racist jokes.Dryk said:Wait... they were aiming these movies as kids?... what...
Who the hell were these movies made for again? Because it obviously wasn't for kids, or for the fans of the original for that matter. Has anyone at Hasbro even SEEN these movies?
The one that got rid of Optimus Prime in an attempt to sell more toys?verindae said:Ok seriously, if there's one thing you absolutely can't remove from transformers it's Optimus Prime. Remember the first Transformers movie back in 1986? Yeah not gonna help sales that.
Also of note, Peter Cullen has an awesome voice lol