Specifically, noon EST on the 24th give or take a few minutes.scotth266 said:Ah, there we go. It should stop on the 24th, I think.
Specifically, noon EST on the 24th give or take a few minutes.scotth266 said:Ah, there we go. It should stop on the 24th, I think.
But now you've learned a skill that will do crap-all nothing for you during the Zombie Apocalypse! You should be proud.Eukaryote said:Learned to count time in binary on Wikipedia, found out it was 8 days, check back on the article: realise it was posted at the end. FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU
It goes like this:dududf said:
Hmm...
... [snip][/snip] ...
From which still translates to nothing. =[
It's BCD (which isn't new-fangled, it's been around for a long time -- in fact many processors even have an assembly instruction to help with BCD-based calculations).Nalgas D. Lemur said:I'm actually really disappointed by the countdown clock. It's really, really lame to have a "tens" column if you're counting in binary. Why be so silly as to make it half binary and half decimal?
Yeah, I know it's not new (I've even seen watches/clocks using it for years and years), but it still bugs me for being kind of silly, particularly for a clock where it's not all that hard to count up to 59 in binary. Now you've got me looking stuff up about it, though, and I didn't realize how widely used it's been, outside of display purposes (which it's legitimately useful for). Maybe if I'd ever done financial or embedded stuff I'd have run into it more, since using BCD would be counterproductive for most things I have done.Miral said:It's BCD (which isn't new-fangled, it's been around for a long time -- in fact many processors even have an assembly instruction to help with BCD-based calculations).
And yes, BCD is wasteful (each digit wastes 6 possible bit patterns), but it's also much easier for humans to read, since we're used to base-10 values.