No, I'm saying look at the "anti-CRT" laws and see what they actually prohibit. Then consider that those tings are what the authors of those laws perceive as being aspects of CRT, and that those things are the sort of things that conservatives *mean* when they talk about CRT as opposed to the rather obtuse field of legal scholarship that has started to bleed out into other things.
As for the 1619 project, it's a series of article about American history that very prominently frame everything in terms of antebellum slavery. The same conservatives calling for "patriotic education" and opposing what they are calling "critical race theory" (again, look at the anti-CRT laws for examples of what they mean when they refer to it) are also not fond of the 1619 project either.