ToastiestZombie said:
It's true, a lot of movies are still shot on traditional film at 24fps (and some TV shows), but digital is the future. Like I had said previously, 24 frames was the
minimum required frames that still made things look good. That's a good point to remember. Standards usually become standards not necessarily because they're better, it's usually because it's the most economical or the best compromise. A good example of this is VHS tapes versus Betamax. Betamax was a higher quality resolution, but more expensive. VHS is gone now, but for a long time it was king. I believe some TV stations still use Betamax decks and cameras.
-
I think at this point (while you're young that is) it might be best for you to skip paper entirely. Granted, paper is cheap, and you don't have to buy an entire light table [http://www.amazon.com/Artograph-inch-Light-Pad-Box/dp/B003N45KRS/ref=wl_it_dp_o_pdT1_S_nC?ie=UTF8&colid=1VYKV0M7R4QNR&coliid=ILOK6JPPNNO0O] to work with it, but it's a hassle to record.
-
Working with paper means you would have to keep your paper 'registered', that is, absolutely still and in perfect alignment when being drawn/scanned. This brings us back to the traditional animation peg [http://thingiverse-production.s3.amazonaws.com/renders/91/1d/f1/88/98/pegbar_display_medium.jpg]. Animation pegs are cheap, but the punches required for the paper aren't. If you could find some way to keep paper registered for both drawing and scanning, then go for it. Otherwise, it might be best to join the digital world and save up for a tablet [http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss_2?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=wacom] so you can start working in Flash or whatever you want like a boss. They can get expensive, but at the very least you would get some experience with a tablet (even a cheap one).