TV licensing puzzles me.

WolfThomas

Man must have a code.
Dec 21, 2007
5,292
0
0
Woah...being Australian I have never heard of a tv licensing fee, the things you learn on the internet.
 

ScarlettRage

New member
May 13, 2009
997
0
0
sounds retarded to me... but if you are paying them, then they have no reason to *****... ingore them
 

Scikosomatic

New member
Sep 15, 2009
269
0
0
Jory said:
So if you don't live somewhere with a TV license, basically in the UK you have to pay £140 a year if you watch or record LIVE TV. (iPlayer etc is free)

Now I'm a student so I've been hounded by threatening letters. And when I say threatening I mean insultingly so.

Pretty much accusations of being a criminal. So on these letters it says that I should ring them up to tell them that I do not require one (which I don't) or they'll come round and I could risk prosecution and a £1000 fine (bare in mind they don't even have the right to enter my property without my permission)

So I ring them up (On a premium rate number no less) and the man on the other end lectures me on the fact that I could be facing prosecution blah blah blah. Now I for one think this is ridiculous.

I've been labelled a criminal in their eyes. Even now he said they would send someone round to 'check'. What the hell was the point of ringing up in the first place?

Has anyone else had similar dealings with these people?

.....uhm, I live in America so I never heard of this before. Are you all saying that in the UK you have to PAY to watch tv, regardless of how you get it?
 

Gunner 51

New member
Jun 21, 2009
1,218
0
0
DemonicKitten said:
Exactly... my mum hated paying for it, as far as she was concerned, you were only meant to be paying for BBC channels only (BBC 1, 2 etc), not the other lot. She hated what was on these channels, there was rarely anything decent on, and she prefered ITV...

Now, i dont know whether this has changed and you are just paying for the privilage of having a tv in your house period, or for the sake of having a metal pole stuck on your roof.
As far as I know, the license fee (supposedly) pays for all of the BBC Stations. Though you don't have to pay for Channel 4 or ITV once you have the license.

However, the reality is that you are paying just for the privilege of being allowed to watch basic TV. It works in the same way as X-box Live. You have to pay the subscription fee just to get access to Live, and then you have to pay for any DLC (or other stations) on top of that.

But I think you can get a Freeview box if you live in Britain which should give you a few more channels. (Be sure to ask in a supermarket / Dixons / Currys.)
 

Gildan Bladeborn

New member
Aug 11, 2009
3,044
0
0
Ha ha ha ha ha, oh man, that is hilarious. Thanks internet! Now whenever I bemoan America's ass-backwards broadband service, I'll have the consolation that at least we don't make our citizenry pay for "the ability to receive television broadcast signals, even if it's just over the internet". Cable or satellite, sure, but broadcast? Next you'll tell me you have a radio license fee, can't have the citizenry operating car stereos without a license!

[small]Oh man will I be laughing if you do in fact have one of those too.[/small]
 

Wulfclaw

New member
Dec 20, 2009
34
0
0
OP: We have something similar in germany and "agents" that act similar. Though we don't get to phone on a costly telephone number, the "agents" get info if someone moves in somewhere and the local "agent" visits you. He usually tries to enter (they generally have no warrant, so you never have to let them in) to have a look if there is a radio or TV and tells horror stories what can happen if you don't tell the truth about your TV/Radio equipment.

Thing is, they tell you very often that just having a TV requires you to pay for having it. Because you have the equipment, so in the future you _could_ use it to look the very few TV Channels that finance themselves through the fee.

Someone some time ago said the following about this: "Hey, you get money from social agencies in germany for having a (or more) child (to help you). You have to apply for it, though. So I just apply for 'Children Money' (Kindergeld) even if my girlfriend and I don't have one. But we have the equipment to produce one in the future."

:)

Edit: Germany does have indeed a fee for radios. See, we are _this_ progressive. ^^
And the Stations for we would have to pay the radio and TV fee are very few. It's a little sad, really.
 

Binerexis

New member
Dec 11, 2009
314
0
0
KingsGambit said:
Binerexis said:
If I don't watch television programs broadcast by the BBC then why should I pay money to the BBC for owning a television?
Because it's the law. It doesn't matter if you watch it or not. If you are capable of receiving the broadcasts, you have to pay it. If you only plan to use DVD/HTPC/console, etc then simply buy a "panel" screen (a display without a built in TV tuner) and you will be fine.
The law is that if I own a TV with the intention of watching broadcasts then I have to own a license. There is nothing illegal about me owning a television to watch DVDs or play on my 360 without a license.

Besides, the whole "if you're capable of doing it" point is arguable. I'm capable of killing, stealing, raping and drug abuse but that is not grounds for me to be arrested without reasonable belief that I am, in fact, a criminal. I was always under the impression that the legal system works under a philosophy of "Innocent until proven guilty". Was I misinformed?
 

johnman

New member
Oct 14, 2008
2,915
0
0
Jory said:
Ah true but you don't need a license for iPlayer.

You only need one to watch TV while it is being broadcast live.
Yes you do, its now that if you have any access to anything that can display TV shows, an internet connection and computer, you have to pay.
 

johnman

New member
Oct 14, 2008
2,915
0
0
Gildan Bladeborn said:
Ha ha ha ha ha, oh man, that is hilarious. Thanks internet! Now whenever I bemoan America's ass-backwards broadband service, I'll have the consolation that at least we don't make our citizenry pay for "the ability to receive television broadcast signals, even if it's just over the internet". Cable or satellite, sure, but broadcast? Next you'll tell me you have a radio license fee, can't have the citizenry operating car stereos without a license!

[small]Oh man will I be laughing if you do in fact have one of those too.[/small]
But that License goes to towards paying for Tv shows whihc can only be seen on the BBC(some of which are excellent) advert free TV, radio, news and online media player.
Its not just some random license you have to pay just to own a TV, you do see benefit from it. You have no idea how nice it is to not have to put up with shitty adverts every 15 minutes.
 

FMAylward

New member
Jan 21, 2010
28
0
0
http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/

"If you watch or record television programmes as they're being shown on TV you must, by law, be covered by a TV Licence, no matter what device you're using."


So the fact that I have a TV, PS3 and laptop doesn't matter, it's only if I want to watch/record someting as it is being shown. Watching last week's episode of whatever on the BBC iplayer is fine since it is not live.


By to way to someone who asked if we have a "Radio Licence" well we used to before TVs and someone once told me if you don't have a TV but a radio then you need a radio licence but I don't think it is true/still applied.
 

Jory

New member
Dec 16, 2009
399
0
0
Gildan Bladeborn said:
Ha ha ha ha ha, oh man, that is hilarious. Thanks internet! Now whenever I bemoan America's ass-backwards broadband service, I'll have the consolation that at least we don't make our citizenry pay for "the ability to receive television broadcast signals, even if it's just over the internet". Cable or satellite, sure, but broadcast? Next you'll tell me you have a radio license fee, can't have the citizenry operating car stereos without a license!

[small]Oh man will I be laughing if you do in fact have one of those too.[/small]
We did have a radio license. It was abolished years back though
 

Trivun

Stabat mater dolorosa
Dec 13, 2008
9,831
0
0
Jory said:
So if you don't live somewhere with a TV license, basically in the UK you have to pay £140 a year if you watch or record LIVE TV. (iPlayer etc is free)

Now I'm a student so I've been hounded by threatening letters. And when I say threatening I mean insultingly so.

Pretty much accusations of being a criminal. So on these letters it says that I should ring them up to tell them that I do not require one (which I don't) or they'll come round and I could risk prosecution and a £1000 fine (bare in mind they don't even have the right to enter my property without my permission)

So I ring them up (On a premium rate number no less) and the man on the other end lectures me on the fact that I could be facing prosecution blah blah blah. Now I for one think this is ridiculous.

I've been labelled a criminal in their eyes. Even now he said they would send someone round to 'check'. What the hell was the point of ringing up in the first place?

Has anyone else had similar dealings with these people?
Trouble is, if you even have a laptop with an internet connection you need a TV License unless you can prove conclusively that you don't use it for things like BBC iPlayer, 4OD, Sky On Demand, ITV Player, etc. I found that out last year when living in university accomodation for my first year. Fortunately, my dad got me a TV License for the year so it was fine. That said, since one of my friends stuck his TV in the kitchen/common area for us all to share during semester two, we started getting nasty letters about it. Not that the license people ever bothered to check. I think they just send them out to intimidate you and then if you don't have one, there's nothing they can actually do without a series of letters warning you and/or a court order/search warrant.

This year I'm living with those same people in a house near campus, and we all chipped in right at the start of the year for a shared TV License. We only need one for the house no matter how many TVs we have (considering there's one in the main room, one in the basement lounge, and then before we got burgled everyone had at least one somewhere in the house, that's well over ten TVs altogether). And we still got stupid thening leers from the Licensing people about it. We ended up on the phone to them telling them to check their bloody records again, and we had no more word from them. They're just scaremongers trying to profit from people.

Then again, the TV License isn't all bad. It funds the BBC after all, which nowadays seems to be the only terrestrial channel with anything good (compare plenty of great BBC programming to the stuff we get from ITV, which is only good sometimes, Channel 4, which just has a few quality shows like it's comedy or stuff like Skins and Hollyoaks, and then Channel Five, which is just plain shit...).
 

Gildan Bladeborn

New member
Aug 11, 2009
3,044
0
0
johnman said:
Gildan Bladeborn said:
Ha ha ha ha ha, oh man, that is hilarious. Thanks internet! Now whenever I bemoan America's ass-backwards broadband service, I'll have the consolation that at least we don't make our citizenry pay for "the ability to receive television broadcast signals, even if it's just over the internet". Cable or satellite, sure, but broadcast? Next you'll tell me you have a radio license fee, can't have the citizenry operating car stereos without a license!

[small]Oh man will I be laughing if you do in fact have one of those too.[/small]
But that License goes to towards paying for Tv shows whihc can only be seen on the BBC(some of which are excellent) advert free TV, radio, news and online media player.
Its not just some random license you have to pay just to own a TV, you do see benefit from it. You have no idea how nice it is to not have to put up with shitty adverts every 15 minutes.
Actually I do, because (and this is key here) nobody actually watches live television here anymore - if you tell somebody you watch live TV where I live we will look at you funny and then ask why you don't have a DVR. Because we all have those - commercial breaks last for only as long as it takes me to press the skip forward button until the show is back on, without so much as an annoying jingle to be heard. Plus I don't have to sit down while shows are actually airing, and if I ever do want to for some inexplicable reason watch a show live that I don't have set up to record, I can just press the pause button, go do something else for a while, and come back whenever I like because the DVR lets me pause live TV.

DVRs totally rock. Also the figures I'm seeing bandied about are suggesting you pay more for broadcast television than I'm paying for my broadband and cable service combined.
 

Noone From Nowhere

New member
Feb 20, 2009
568
0
0
As bad as the US government can be at times, they know better than to try to impose such a fee on the people. Paying for TV is what commercial advertisements are for, live or otherwise.
 

Gildan Bladeborn

New member
Aug 11, 2009
3,044
0
0
Jory said:
Gildan Bladeborn said:
Next you'll tell me you have a radio license fee, can't have the citizenry operating car stereos without a license!

[small]Oh man will I be laughing if you do in fact have one of those too.[/small]
We did have a radio license. It was abolished years back though
...

I... that... wow. I mention charging license fees for the privilege of owning a device that can translate all those radio signals scurrying about into sound specifically because I thought it was too ridiculous to possibly be real a real thing anyone would ever do, and you're telling me your government actually did that at one point.

I'm holding you medically responsible when I laugh myself into a coma!
 

FMAylward

New member
Jan 21, 2010
28
0
0
The BBC (Who gets the money from it) has been around since before TVs were invented, they just changed the license from Radio to TVs when they took over.
 
May 7, 2008
175
0
0
Scikosomatic said:
.....uhm, I live in America so I never heard of this before. Are you all saying that in the UK you have to PAY to watch tv, regardless of how you get it?
yeah and then to add insult to injury if you want to watch non-terestial (I can't spell alright) channels you than have to pay their subscription fees on top. Its little more than a government enforced protection racket and personally I feel they should scrap it.
 

Jory

New member
Dec 16, 2009
399
0
0
Trivun said:
Trouble is, if you even have a laptop with an internet connection you need a TV License unless you can prove conclusively that you don't use it for things like BBC iPlayer, 4OD, Sky On Demand, ITV Player, etc.
Not to sound rude. But you do NOT need one for iPlayer. It mentions these on demand services specifically on the letters. The law may have changed since last year though
 

dragontiers

The Temporally Displaced
Feb 26, 2009
497
0
0
I'm a bit naive here, being American and not British (and I knew about the TV license, yay for The Young Ones!), but aren't there laws against harassment that apply? In the US, even if you do owe a company money, there are certain things they are not allowed to do (though they do try them when they can get away with them) such as calling your employer, threatening to repossess things they don't have a right to, etc. It strikes me that there should be some law against arbitrarily sending out letters demanding money for a service that you probably are not receiving. It would be like the Department of Motor Vehicles calling me up and threatening to have me arrested for driving without a license, regardless of whether I own a car and drive or not. Isn't there a Better Business Bureau or equivalent you can go to to get help with this?