TV News Report Warns of "Cyber-Bullying" on Xbox Live

Kenbo Slice

Deep In The Willow
Jun 7, 2010
2,706
0
41
Gender
Male
Sheila Broflovski put it best "Horrific, Deplorable violence is okay, as long as people don't say any naughty words!"

Granted she was talking about the MPAA but it can still be applied here.
 

dwp9296

New member
Mar 25, 2012
21
0
0
This has probably been said several billion times, but why has an 8 year old been allowed to play Call of Duty in the first place. It's rated M for Mature, swearing wouldn't be the only concern. Are parents really that lazy to not make an informed decision on what their children can and cannot play? I mean, it's on the box for fucks sake.
 

Strazdas

Robots will replace your job
May 28, 2011
8,407
0
0
SonOfVoorhees said:
Look at Escapist, their rules keep comments insult free and those that bad mouth others are banned temporary and if they continue are banned permanently. Live and PSN need the same rules, gaming is meant to be fun and not make some kids face racial or sexual insults that have no relevance for the game they are playing. The internet just gives people free rein to act like arseholes as there is zero consequences to them from the person they are insulting. In real life these people are pathetic losers who would insult no one.

There has been a lot of issues in schools when kids are bullied and not much is done about it, i dont see why we shouldnt have this dealt with Live or PSN. I cant walk into a bar and call a random person a **** without consequence, so why should it be ok to do so on an M rated online game?
I think the reason escapist keeps comments insult free is more of a community solution than rule patrol solution. sure the banning and punishing has filtered out the bad people over the years. but if we had the userbase of, say, eggsbox COD players we would not avoid it save for pressing ignore on half the forum. Gaming is meant to be fun, and for some people fun means insulting the opponent. We dont think its fun, while they may not think something else is fun that we consider fun. Both opinions are equally worth, and the reason we are the rulemakers is simply because we are a majority. Internet gives them free reign to be what they trully are without being punished for being what they really are. In real life they may not insult anyone because they are afraid of what that would bring, because sadly in our society the only right opinion is the one that punches all the people with opposite ones. On the internet however there is no such ability and therefore people are free to be what they want to be, and its no secret that majority of people are complete assholes.
 

Dragonpit

New member
Nov 10, 2010
637
0
0
This is all well and good, but I couldn't help but notice the parts "8-12 years old" and "Call of Duty" being used in conjunction. Really, what are kids doing playing M-rated games in the first place? Mind, I can see where these people are coming from, but while all the trash talk and what not could use a bit of cleaning up, allowing your kids to be exposed to it by giving them access to games intending for people 17 or older seems to be a misdemeanor in and of itself.
 

Thyunda

New member
May 4, 2009
2,955
0
0
Zachary Amaranth said:
Thyunda said:
It's kinda bizarre, isn't it? Haven't to acknowledge that some people aren't as mentally resilient as you or I, and that something as basic as Grand Theft Auto, the original games before shit got 3D, were actually capable of making people violent.

Apparently.
I'm not sure they're made violent. Maybe they're set off, but it seems like people already have some penchant. I mean, most video game studies at best show that aggressive people like violent video games. There is a link between violence and aggression and video games, but not link that sets them up as the cause.

I'm more the opposite. It's bizarre to me that I even need to quantify that I'm not going to shoot up a building any time soon. Most gamers are relatively normal. Especially if you include casual gamers. Because we run a spectrum and are human, there will inevitably be some crazies among us. but Charlie Manson thought he was getting secret messages to kill from the Beatles. Nobody ever assumes the Beatles are going to turn you into a serial killer. Well, not anymore. Kinda like that whole rock and roll scare. "If we let our kids listen to negro music, they will become overridden by animal lust and start fornicating!"

Pretty sure puberty had more to do with me having sex than Elvis or Lennon.

People have imitated TV, comics, music, literature. It will happen time and again, and with pretty much every medium. If some opera fan watched Der Ring Des Nibelung, would we crusade to shut down operas en masse? I'd hope not.

And you consider half the video game related shootings they use as examples aren't relly video game related....It's so messed up.

I think kids just need to learn right from wrong. That will help the 99% that can be helped. There are, inevitably, time bombs among us. As with everybody.

Now, I know it's partially unfair to blame parents. Parents have to work much longer these days on average to pull in the same cash. Kids are marketed to, and it's hard to monitor them when the model of one-parent-working is slowly going extinct. But it should be easier to instill right and wrong than to constantly monitor them.
That's another concept that bemuses me. This apparent immunity offspring possess regarding their actions. Never once does anybody say "The kid shouldn't be swearing over Live." It's always kinda victim-blaming - Why are your kids even playing that game? They're too young?

Well, I'm sorry, but the rating is for violence, not for language. They could be playing Viva Pinata online and they'd still get this kind of abuse - if that game had a competitive online multiplayer.
Now that I think about it, that's kinda horrifying.

Course, when us gamers appear to be the only people who are aware that games AREN'T the cause, it doesn't work...and since gamer is such a vague term it encompasses anybody who so much as possesses a Nintendo Wii, there is nobody that can actually defend it. It's like trying to say heroin is a miracle cure for cancer when you have a needle sticking out of your arm - even if it WAS true, nobody would believe you because you clearly have a personal stake in it.

But of course, the non-gamers, those who shun the abhorrent machine devils, they are the Enlightened Ones who have escaped the brainwashing and know the dangers of videogames, and the perfect world that was lost to the virtual violent hypnosis. Ah, the 40s. Such a peaceful time...no violence at all. The last bastion of serenity in a world quickly lost to degenerate gaming.
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
Thyunda said:
That's another concept that bemuses me. This apparent immunity offspring possess regarding their actions. Never once does anybody say "The kid shouldn't be swearing over Live." It's always kinda victim-blaming - Why are your kids even playing that game? They're too young?
Good point, really. Though, to some extent we have this view of kids in all fields. Kids can't generally enter into contracts until the age of majority, can't drink, drive (until sixteen), have sex without it being considered rape due to lack of consent, etc. It's not surprising we offer it up to parenting. Parents are guardians of their kids in both a de facto and a very deliberate sense.

Well, I'm sorry, but the rating is for violence, not for language. They could be playing Viva Pinata online and they'd still get this kind of abuse - if that game had a competitive online multiplayer.
Now that I think about it, that's kinda horrifying.
Yeah, kinda. I mean, all it takes is one jerk.

Though as a sidenote, pretty much everyone in my school was exposed to swearing by age eight. Schoolyard, the bus driver, our own parents...My father let me listen to rap when I was ten because he figured everything I heard there was no worse than what I'd already heard "on the street." And it's true. Hell, even "******" was old hat to me. Incidentally, I'm still uncomfortable using the word.

The reason I bring that up is I'm always curious as to how much parents can even stop their kids from this content. I mean, my parents could stop me from listening to rap at home, but as my dad pointed out, I'd heard it all before. And it's not like it impacted my language much; one summer at my grandparents, they were shocked to hear me use the word "damn" once, even though I was like fifteen at the time and not a serial cusser. I mean, it may impact other kids' language. Who am I to say, really? None of us can speak for everyone, but the point is, a lot of kids already know this language before playing online. I'm not even entirely sure how much protection they need. In this day and age, it seems impossible not to be exposed to profanity, unless you're Amish or raised in a monastery. Like, if you want to protect your kids, it seems like you'd need a plastic bubble and home schooling, because swearing is pretty common these days.

Course, when us gamers appear to be the only people who are aware that games AREN'T the cause, it doesn't work...and since gamer is such a vague term it encompasses anybody who so much as possesses a Nintendo Wii, there is nobody that can actually defend it. It's like trying to say heroin is a miracle cure for cancer when you have a needle sticking out of your arm - even if it WAS true, nobody would believe you because you clearly have a personal stake in it.
There's also the element that we take information in rather casually these days. Rather than process what studies say, people run with the sound bite.

Using your drug reference, a lot of people can't even tell you what the negative effects of pot are. I don't smoke it, I don't condone it, but the fact is, people are all "POT IS BAD!" And can't even tell you why. Well, I can: They saw it on TV. Or some other media, possibly even on the interwebs, but we've got to the point of not challenging ideas at all. Look at the number of people who thought Saddam Hussein was responsible for 9-11 when the US went into Iraq.

On the flip side, the gaming community has had trouble being objective about this, too. This site has seen a ton of people outright deny any link between violence and video games, even though the link isn't causal. There's a lot of defensive hostility in the community. I can't entirely say it's without merit, though, since I've grown up with the pitchforks and torches.

But of course, the non-gamers, those who shun the abhorrent machine devils, they are the Enlightened Ones who have escaped the brainwashing and know the dangers of videogames, and the perfect world that was lost to the virtual violent hypnosis. Ah, the 40s. Such a peaceful time...no violence at all. The last bastion of serenity in a world quickly lost to degenerate gaming.
XD. I like that.

Earlier today, I made another post talking about the 50s, and how they were so much better. You know, as long as you were a straight, white, Christian male of middle class or better. Who hadn't been accused of communism, of course.

Pretty close to the 40s, as well.
 

TheMadDoctorsCat

New member
Apr 2, 2008
1,163
0
0
weirdguy said:
Next up on the news, beehives: do you REALLY know what happens when your kids play near one?
Heeheeheehee. :) Ok, that made me laugh more than pretty much any other comment I've seen for a month or so. Bravo, sir. Bravo.
 

Zach Smith

New member
Aug 11, 2010
4
0
0
I think the main point this article is missing is that "8-, 9-, 10-, 11-year-old kids" SHOULDN'T BE PLAYING M RATED GAMES ANYWAY. It's the parent's fault if their kid hears something bad on a game like that. I don't see parents handing their kids hard liquor and then getting offended the kid got drunk. Ya idiot...
 

MB202

New member
Sep 14, 2008
1,157
0
0
I don't know about "dirty words" but cyber-bullying is definitely something to watch out for.
 

Kinguendo

New member
Apr 10, 2009
4,267
0
0
Parents are the worst, "Blame everyone else, but dont you dare blame me!"... If I hear one more person say "As a mother..." as though that makes the bullshit that follows anymore meaningful, I am going to throw myself off of a very tall building with the specific intent of landing on that person.

EDIT: I should prefice that "Parents" with... what? 75% of parents?
 

Epona

Elite Member
Jun 24, 2011
4,221
0
41
Country
United States
Zach Smith said:
I think the main point this article is missing is that "8-, 9-, 10-, 11-year-old kids" SHOULDN'T BE PLAYING M RATED GAMES ANYWAY. It's the parent's fault if their kid hears something bad on a game like that. I don't see parents handing their kids hard liquor and then getting offended the kid got drunk. Ya idiot...
Actually, most parents who hand their kids M Rated games are fully aware of the the language. I just bought Bulletstorm on Steam a few days ago, didn't think twice about letting my kid play it. If he says the dirty words, I'll deal with it but as long as he doesn't, it's all good. The fact is that parents are supposed to accept the bad language at school because "the teachers can only do so much" but at home we are supposed to shield our children from it. What good does it do to shield them from it at home then send them to school? Further, weren't we all exposed to cursing in movies and at school when we were kids too? Is cursing really the end of the world?

I wish people would quit assuming that every parent is complaining just because some local news station ran a sensationalist story. Most parents aren't complaining about cursing and as far as XBOX Live goes, parents should be more concerned about what their kids say instead of what other people on XBOX Live are saying. That would solve a big part of the problem.