The anime's first episode has nude shots in the shower, apparently. I have not read the manga, nor do I wish to watch the show, but a romance between a teacher an a kindergarten student in any context creeps me the hell out. ANd considering the amount of sperging that went on on a number of TvTropes pages before the editing was stepped up, they're better off without the pages anyways.Beffudled Sheep said:To be fair to Kodomo No Jikan it isn't that bad.Soviet Heavy said:Like lolicon pages and nakamas. When you hear someone say that an interesting page has been deleted, think about the content that was on it. There were people defending loli shows like Kodomo No Jikan or whatever the hell its called, or screaming because s trope like nakama was renamed Band of Brothers to be more universal and stop using gratuitous japanese.Queen Michael said:Like what?crazyrabbits said:a number of other interesting tropes or pages have been renamed or deleted outright.
Only the manga though, I've never watched the anime.
Agreed, but you won't see that sort of analysis on a TvTropes article. Just a list and someone saying "fedoras are badass!". There are analysis tabs on the pages, but apart from a few scattered examples, they are ghost towns. Nobody wants to look at the ins and outs of why something is used, they just want to list things.Scow2 said:Symbolism and imagery ARE narrative conventions, and people are familiar with fedoras being worn to indicate a person kicks ass, so just putting on the hat conveys that the character can kick ass without having to have special previous scenes establishing him as capable of kicking ass until he absolutely needs to. It's actually a lot more subtle, subconscious, and complex than that, but there is a LOT of imagery packed into a character's design.Soviet Heavy said:That still doesn't get down to the why. It just goes "this man wheres a fedora, ergo Badass". Why is the Fedora considered the mark of a badass? Because it just so happens to be on a person who is? It's not like the hat itself does anything to the person to enhance their skill. A trope is a storytelling convention. A hat is not a storytelling convention. Simply being is not enough, there has to be a reason behind it.Scow2 said:It's apparently prevalent enough to be a stock symbol, but not quite so ubiquitous as to be taken for granted. So it does need to be its own trope.Soviet Heavy said:Which is a redundant trope of the badass archetype. Why does there need to be a page on how a Fedora makes a guy a badass, when the page on the archetype itself could have a section on why a character might be conceived as badass, or what sort of things could signify him as badass.Queen Michael said:It sure isn't. But using it to show that a character is a bad@$$ is a trope. [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/FedoraOfAsskicking]Soviet Heavy said:A fedora isn't a trope
It doesn't need its own page, but it has one anyways. There is almost no discussion, only endless lists. I'd rather have an analysis of why something is viewed as a trope, rather than just listing off whatever happens to correspond to increasingly specific set of requirements.