Twilight and Violent Videogames

Recommended Videos

Scabadus

Wrote Some Words
Jul 16, 2009
868
0
0
I should mention before I begin that I've never read Twilight or any of its sequals. Don't particularly want to either, so this is going to be "second hand" feelings I'm discussing.

With that out of the way, I came to a rather distressing realisation last night. One of those realisations where one peice of logic you believe in disproves another. You see, a lot of people complain about Twilight's 'message': girls should make themselves totally subserviant to the dominant males in their lives and as long as they're submissive enough, respect marriage and, perhaps most importently, a virgin said males will fight over them. It has been argued that the novels and now movies are teaching girls and young women that they are not as importent as the local men are and the only way thier lives have meaning is to attatch themselves to a convinient Y chromasone.

Up until now I've always agreed with this argument, after all we as a culture are beyond this.. arn't we? Well yes we are and it would seem a very bad thing to raise a generation of powerless women who don't even realise what a shame it is that they are not contributing to the human race and Twilight should be critisised for teaching this.

Except, there's one problem with that critisism. It's a problem we as gamers all know very well: "violent videogames don't make children into serial killers" or put more generally "fictional events don't influence people's lives".

Now don't get me wrong, there are other considerations here and this isn't a black and white topic; for example somebody with a pre-disposition to violence who happens to be playing.. uh.. Blood Money may make their next kill with Fiber Wire. This is the basis for the whole "movies/videogames turn our children evil" argument and I think there may be some sort of reverse interaction here; girls with a predisposision to submission to males may have this movie confirm that it's ok... though no more so than Die Hard confirms it's ok to kill whoever's being mean to you.

Now I know it's the cool thing right now to rage at Twilight and how awful it is, which is why I deliberatly havn't mentioned stories, characters, plot or.. well anything specific, really. As I said I havn't read the books so I'm in no position to discuss whether they stand up on their own as "art" (yes I am one of the people who think you must try something before judging it fully) though I do know that the author is capable of telling a good story (I really liked The Host). I just wanted to share this realisation that although hating Twilight is very popular among most people and especially so among gamers one of if not the only argument we use to defend our hobby can also be used, almost word for word to defend Twilight's "corrupting" influence on girls and young women.

So I guess I'm a little short on discussion value in this thread, sorry about that. If you're running dry on creativity though try answering this: do you think my argument has merit? And perhaps more interestingly, if it doesn't have merit then why does 'teaching' women to be submissive in a book somehow "work" yet 'teaching' children via games to go chop up their friends with a kitchen knife "doesn't work"?
 

Blind Sight

New member
May 16, 2010
1,657
0
0
Personally I dislike the Twilight books because they're poorly written and Stephanie Meyer needs to look up 'perfect' in a goddamn thesaurus. But the movies, oh god do I love the movies. Seriously, just view the Twilight films as satire and rip the shit out of them with friends, I guarantee you'll have fun (or get thrown out of a theatre, as I was at New Moon. What, when Jacob says stuff like 'I can't change Bella, I was BORN THIS WAY' while his buddies wrestle shirtless in the background, I'm calling suppressed homosexuality on that one. Of course, saying this loudly in the theatre was a bad idea, but pretty much every guy there got a good laugh).

The militant Twilight fans are the only problem, there's been bloody assault cases because someone mocked Twilight and got attacked.
 

Frotality

New member
Oct 25, 2010
981
0
0
i point you towards a series of youtbubes called "alex reads twilight". its a fairly entertainment british man reviewing the book chapter by chapter, often commenting as he reads it. he started reading it after hearing some people call it great and some calling it crap, and set out to read it as unbiased as he could could be. its the next best thing to actually reading it.

your argument does have merit; i myself have come to the conclusion that yes, violent media DOES influence people to violence, but only people who are sufficiently stupid and weak-willed enough to begin with and who would be set off by any number of other things. basically, there isnt any invention of humanity that someone somewhere wont completely fuck up, you dont blame the gun for murder, you blame the person.
 

Vryyk

New member
Sep 27, 2010
393
0
0
I think that if parents do their job properly the necessary mental resolve to avoid being influenced in the way you mentioned will already be ingrained in the child nine out of ten times.
That being said, garbage in, garbage out. If impressionable young kids feed themselves the same message time and time again, there may come a time where some of them actually believe it. We just have to hope our youth possess the savvy to know either avoiding the material in question or ignoring that kind of message is the best course of action.
 

HotFezz8

New member
Nov 1, 2009
1,139
0
0
Scabadus said:
and the only way thier lives have meaning is to attatch themselves to a convinient Y chromasone.
im quoting you becuase i love how awesome that single senteence was :-D

and OT and briefly: yes, in a very broad sense you can link the two, as messages such as twilight and condemned both can affect children. the importnat thing is the children and their parents.

the most influencial film/book/game/whatever can come out, but the message will have no affect if the child doesn't understand, doesn't care, or the parents are vigilant and aware enough to put the message into context.
 

Casual Shinji

Should've gone before we left.
Legacy
Jul 18, 2009
20,971
5,850
118
It's an interesting theory.

I've honestly never thought of Twilight as something that would corrupt the minds of impressionable young girls; afterall, it's just a fantasy for them to hug their pillows over. And I don't think girls like Twilight because of the submissive female behavior, but because of the two hunks fighting over the damsel.
 

movienut

New member
Nov 5, 2010
127
0
0
Here is the way I see it. In most violent video games there is something redeamable about the characters so parents can highlight the good parts. In Twilight there is nothing about the females that I would want my daughters to look up to.

Along the same lines my kids are not allowed to play the GTA games in my home either.
 

Eatspeeple

New member
Jun 18, 2009
128
0
0
It's less being influenced by the message in passing, and more about becoming obsessed with something it seems. Being obsessed with a single series would result in a greater exposure to the overall 'message', but being obsessed with violent games is closer to being obsessed with a medium. I'm not saying it won't be harmful, but the lack of tangable evidence for either viewpoint would render any debate a back and forth of unsubstanciated opinions, propped up perhaps only by anecdotal evidence.
 

Zinkraptor

New member
Oct 25, 2010
24
0
0
Yeah, I kind of felt the same way about that sexism thing, although I didn't think to compare it to the "violence in videogames" thing until now.

The book sucks because it is horribly written and has a terrible story. But when people start talking about how it's teaching young girls the wrong "lessons" or whatever, it seems like people are just looking for excuses to complain about the book more. Which is unnecessary because the book has enough terrible things already.

Basically, I think people over-estimate the amount of influence fictional stories have on people.
 

Blind Sight

New member
May 16, 2010
1,657
0
0
I realized I probably should've comment on your actual theory as well as just my opinion. I think that Twilight attracts girls and women who are already pre-disposed to have sub-conscious feelings that are only enforced by Twilight, rather then caused by it. I don't know about you, but the majority of Twilight fans I know either view it as 'girl porn' or already share some of the philosophy of it (i.e. obsession with finding the 'perfect man', belief that the man should conform to the woman's ideals, etc.)

I mean, hell, Twilight is full of Mormon propaganda, but you don't see all these girls and women joining up with the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints.
 
Nov 12, 2010
1,167
0
0
The problem is not so much that people are being taught this stuff so much as they want to watch it.I am all for personal views and prefer to keep an open mind,but Twilight really is just fan-service in a 1 1/2 hour format.You can like it if you want but the fact that people obsess over such things whether it be liked or otherwise is a problem,not to say we are not guilty over some of these things as well mind you,but there is a sense of self governing that people have to respect.If you really are dumb enough to follow such a thing,you probably would without the influence.The thing is,the more you try to hide something,the worse it will get.People see many gamers as losers or children,but that is due to ignorance.It is said same with Twilight fans.I personally see no value of entertainment in Twilight but that is my opinion.If you really are dumb enough to do something you know as wrong,especially something so blatantly obvious,then what would stop you as a bottled up mute from doing it anyway?
 

Littaly

New member
Jun 26, 2008
1,810
0
0
I don't think Twilight makes girls more submissive than video games make us gamers violent. But I'm not sure that there is no influence whatsoever.

I belong with the crown who thinks that violent video games affect us. Now, I don't believe they affect us in a significant way, we're certainly not gonna grow up to be killers or even have more violent tendencies, but I do think it has an effect on a subtle (subconcept?) level. Maybe we don't react as strongly to violence, maybe we're not as shocked by it, maybe it takes more for us to grasp it. I don't know, I'm just speculating, I know most people disagree with me but whatever.

With Twilight I think it's different. I think the whole "teaches girls to be submissive" thing is not as much "Twilight is dangerous and will teach your girl to be submissive" as "the values of Twilight are severely outdated". The point is not that chicks will be so into Twilight that they will grow up to be submissive, but rather that the book is written on a pretty shaky premise. Kind of like Passion of the Christ, people were upset with it mostly because it had anti-semitic undertones, not because they were afraid said undertones would change the way people look at Jews.
 

Thaius

New member
Mar 5, 2008
3,861
0
0
Scabadus said:
Except, there's one problem with that critisism. It's a problem we as gamers all know very well: "violent videogames don't make children into serial killers" or put more generally "fictional events don't influence people's lives".
Except that generalization is incorrect. It takes the concept too far.

Fictional events definitely influence people's lives. Stories define and record culture, and are an absolutely vital part of society for that very reason. Stories are an active part of what shapes a culture's values. Honestly though, I hardly find "respect marriage" and the value of chastity to be such a horrible message...

Anyway, the point is that being subjected to a particular story and message will not affect someone who knows full well that they stand against it. No one (with the possible exception of a few people with issues) reading Harry Potter suddenly believed in magic, because anyone reading it was intelligent enough to know that magic isn't real. A Christian can watch a movie about atheists and have no problem with it because they are firm in their beliefs. And a sane person can play a violent video game and not turn violent because they're already fully aware that murder is wrong (excluding the possibilities of a post-modern, subjectivist worldview, but I won't get into that).

Point is, stories only affect us to the degree to which our minds are not already made up. If someone is not dead set in the idea that marriage means nothing and virginity is worthless, they could fall prey to the messages of the books. Though I still fail to see how that is a bad message... Maybe the books take it too far, but really? Are we really trying to protect the children of this generation from the idea that marriage and sex could actually be a valuable thing that should be handled carefully and maturely?
 

tehbeard

New member
Jul 9, 2008
587
0
0
Frotality said:
i point you towards a series of youtbubes called "alex reads twilight". its a fairly entertainment british man reviewing the book chapter by chapter, often commenting as he reads it. he started reading it after hearing some people call it great and some calling it crap, and set out to read it as unbiased as he could could be. its the next best thing to actually reading it....
Thank you sir. This is hilarious.

As for OP's argument. I do agree there is some correlation in the argument, but I feel they are seperate.

This is on the basis that most children are given a set of "baseline morals" (Don't steal, kill,torture etc) which means the "video games make u a murderer" argument null (apart from very small minority without these morals so rigidly enforced)

Yet very little advice on relationships is given to us/we don't want the advice from parents (to save us from disturbing mental images). Think how awkard some people are when they have their first crush etc. possibly the argument Twilight "corrupts" young women/girls is not so much brainwashing as it being the only advice they have for a situation they have no clue about.

Then again this could all be bullcrap, I'm a Comp. Sci. undergrad, not psychology student. But it's the argument that makes the most logical sense to me.

Tl;dr:
Twilight and violent video games are same argument, but difference is in knowledge the child has before reading them. knowledge that killing etc is bad means very little influence from violent video games, where as little experience with relationships means twilight more influencial. However as always there are the odd case.

Feel free to constructivly critise this.