Spoiler tags dont feel like much of a stretch either.thevillageidiot13 said:Even though it made sense and everything, Knights of the Old Republic, when you find out that you're Revan.
It felt like too much of a stretch.
Spoiler tags dont feel like much of a stretch either.thevillageidiot13 said:Even though it made sense and everything, Knights of the Old Republic, when you find out that you're Revan.
It felt like too much of a stretch.
Maybe I don't know much about literature (I should due to studying English at A-level) but I never pegged Dan Brown as a bad writer, exactly. Sure there's many better ones out there, but his books are always enjoyable.TheStatutoryApe said:Dan Brown is a shit writer basically. He got popular because of the apparent "scandal" of the story line in "Da Vinci Code" which was really already old hat as evidenced by the authors of "The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail" suing him for supposed copyright infringement. His only other claim to being a decent author is his thriller pacing. Once while looking up advice on how to get published I found an article by Dan Brown basically saying "Write a cookie-cutter formulaic piece of crap and the publishers will eat it up" which unfortunately is probably true.ReservoirAngel said:I massively confused by these:
Da Vinci Code:
Angels and Demons:
If any Dan Brown fans can explain who 2 to me, I'd be very grateful since they always baffle me.
I have read all of his books (I'm a book addict and turn to the newsstand when I don't have access to a real bookstore) and they are frightfully similar. He reuses the "trusted mentor turns out to be the bad guy" twist in at least three of his novels and his "bad guys" in Angels and Demons and The Lost Symbol don't fall very far from that mark either. In The Lost Symbol, most fresh in my memory, he goes to quite some length to obscure the true identity of the bad guy similar as you note with Angels and Demons.
Treefingers said:ayuri said:Nintendolover222 said:ayuri said:ultrachicken said:I have no idea what you're saying.ayuri said:haha did not see spoilerultrachicken said:To answer your question.ayuri said:why did you reply to this (the most random twist of all).ultrachicken said:ayuri said:Nintendolover222 said:ayuri said:inceptionthey start the movie off where if you die in the dream you wake up, half way through they are in a state where if they die in the dream they die for real (also his wife went to limbo from dying from a dream)The sedative they all took so that they could go down to the otherwise unreachable third dream level causes their heavily sedated subconscious to go into limbo. It's like the sedative is so strong that if you die in the dream you essentially go into a coma in real life. Saito 'dies' and goes to limbo, and after Cobb confesses to Ariadne about Mal he goes down there to find him, risking having to confront Mal again.then how did she get there?She's part of [Character who Leonardo plays]'s subconscious.
The plot twists in MGS4. They didn't bother to explain a damned thing.both her and Leonard went to limbo before the sedative and then left and then she killed herself. beat that.In a flashback story in inception they both go to limbo, all of this unfolds before it was possible to die in the dream.Mal committed suicide in real life. Whenever Cobb is in a dream, his subconscious creates visions of her. I think you've got it all muddled up.she committed suicide because Leonard put the idea in her head in limbo. Then how did they get to limbo w/o the drug?Who says they didn't have the drug then? As far as i can tell, that's just left unexplained. It was before the events of the film take place. They shouldn't have to explain everything. The film functions perfectly well without telling you why they were in limbo back then. Fill in the gaps for yourself - Previous mission, things went wrong, stuck in limbo.
It's a cop out.ayuri said:Monty python and the holy grailthey go on a grand adventure to get the castle and this is the ending
What makes it worse is thatajb924 said:Alright, so here's the rundown. Two angel sisters fight ghosts to try to get back into heaven. The two beat the main bad guy and re-seal hell together. Then, in the last MINUTE Of the anime, one of the sisters slices up the other with the simple explanation "Sorry, I'm really a demon."
And here I'd successfully forgotten....Pirate Kitty said:Bionic Commando: Rearmed.
I mean... what?
They also end other skits with everyone getting arrestedstinkychops said:They were planning a huge battle but ran out of money and cast. Having used the entire crew to form the English side.Dfskelleton said:That was kind of the point of the ending: to be ridiculously anticlimactic. That's one of the many things that made it funny, as well as Monty Python funny in general: Absolute Nonsense.ayuri said:Monty python and the holy graillast week someone said "there are three of them" and I answered "not if I run away"(I died)they go on a grand adventure to get the castle and this is the ending
Ninja....Quantum Roberts said:Planet of the Apes.
Oh not the original with Charlton Heston. No, that was genius. I'm talking about the Tim Burton remake. That...but..wha?!
Quite. My College Professor was missing so it took a lot of work to make sense of it at times.Dragonpit said:It's one thing to provide a twist; it's another to make it seem plausible.
Good example:Disgaea. A character re-named "Midboss" by the main character turns out to be the main character's father. It may seem over done, but the delivery was spectacular. It doesn't seem too far out, either.
Bad example:Chrono Cross. The game is so over complicated due to twists, it can literally be described as Echer. Metal Gear may have been bad, but Chrono Cross takes the cake. A futuristic city sent back in time to counter the appearance of a prehistoric city sent forwards. Lavos divided into six dragons, which helped you a great deal beforehand. Alternate realities. Three children which suspiciously look like the characters from Chrono Trigger giving out story explanations. Mind you, Chrono Cross isn't a BAD game, but you need a few things to get through the story, including a textbook or two and a college professor.
I said once, and can not fully remember my own quote, that "It is to the everlasting dismay of literary connoisseurs that the unwashed masses seem to enjoy bad writing", I may very well be embellishing my choice of vocabulary. Essentially Brown writes with an addicting pace, you can tear right through one of his novels and hardly blink an eye, but that is about the only good thing he has going for him. The dialog is bad, the characters are two dimensional, and even the often interesting subjects of his novels are parred down to a gradeschool level of intellect. He makes for good mass consumption and newsstand fodder but that's about it.ReservoirAngel said:Maybe I don't know much about literature (I should due to studying English at A-level) but I never pegged Dan Brown as a bad writer, exactly. Sure there's many better ones out there, but his books are always enjoyable.
I just wish he'd understand the concept of 'foreshadowing'. If you're gonna reveal an ally to be the villain, Brown should have left some clues in there. Currently it comes off as just the villain turning round suddenly and going "oh btw, i'm the person your fighting against after all." There's zero build-up to it, he might as well have turned Langdon evil!
That was a cliche? how? what other show/movie was INSANE enough to have done that before? i thought it was great, the ending. considering how many million loose ends that show had, they did a fair job. it wasn't perfect, but it was good.Truehare said:OT: I was going to mention the ending of Lost, but it wasn't really nonsensical, only unsatisfying.
They kind of went for that old "they are all in the afterlife" cliché, even if only to explain the supposedly "alternate" timeline. I found that explanation unsatisfying because it wasn't related to the unique properties of the island; it is something that apparently happens to everyone after they die, not only to those special people.
Frozen Donkey Wheel2 said:Treefingers said:ayuri said:Nintendolover222 said:ayuri said:ultrachicken said:I have no idea what you're saying.ayuri said:haha did not see spoilerultrachicken said:To answer your question.ayuri said:why did you reply to this (the most random twist of all).ultrachicken said:ayuri said:Nintendolover222 said:ayuri said:inceptionthey start the movie off where if you die in the dream you wake up, half way through they are in a state where if they die in the dream they die for real (also his wife went to limbo from dying from a dream)The sedative they all took so that they could go down to the otherwise unreachable third dream level causes their heavily sedated subconscious to go into limbo. It's like the sedative is so strong that if you die in the dream you essentially go into a coma in real life. Saito 'dies' and goes to limbo, and after Cobb confesses to Ariadne about Mal he goes down there to find him, risking having to confront Mal again.then how did she get there?She's part of [Character who Leonardo plays]'s subconscious.
The plot twists in MGS4. They didn't bother to explain a damned thing.both her and Leonard went to limbo before the sedative and then left and then she killed herself. beat that.In a flashback story in inception they both go to limbo, all of this unfolds before it was possible to die in the dream.Mal committed suicide in real life. Whenever Cobb is in a dream, his subconscious creates visions of her. I think you've got it all muddled up.she committed suicide because Leonard put the idea in her head in limbo. Then how did they get to limbo w/o the drug?Who says they didn't have the drug then? As far as i can tell, that's just left unexplained. It was before the events of the film take place. They shouldn't have to explain everything. The film functions perfectly well without telling you why they were in limbo back then. Fill in the gaps for yourself - Previous mission, things went wrong, stuck in limbo.Mal and Cobb went into limbo(with the required sedative. "Why WOULDN'T they be able to use it?" is the real question.) They did it, essentially, just for fun. Seriously, there's quite a few shots of them just sitting on the floor of a house somewhere, getting ready to "limbo" voluntarily, under no duress whatsoever. Where did you get the whole "job gone wrong" thing? Anyway, eventually Cobb becomes concerned that they will never leave because Mal has become convinced that Limbo is reality. He performs inception, they leave, she commits suicide, etc, etc. At any point after that, Mal is dead, and she is only appearing as Cobb's incredibly powerful subconscious.
The REAL plot hole of Inception(though not really a twist) is that Cobb's creations are still there in Limbo when...you know...the Asian guy shows up, even though it's not Cobb's dream AND he wasn't the architect for the dream.
His books enjoyable, perhaps, but they don't match the genre. There's supposed to be intrigue and plot twists, but really, he just throws shit out at the last minute.ReservoirAngel said:Maybe I don't know much about literature (I should due to studying English at A-level) but I never pegged Dan Brown as a bad writer, exactly. Sure there's many better ones out there, but his books are always enjoyable.
ayuri said:Nintendolover222 said:ayuri said:ultrachicken said:I have no idea what you're saying.ayuri said:haha did not see spoilerultrachicken said:To answer your question.ayuri said:why did you reply to this (the most random twist of all).ultrachicken said:ayuri said:Nintendolover222 said:ayuri said:inceptionthey start the movie off where if you die in the dream you wake up, half way through they are in a state where if they die in the dream they die for real (also his wife went to limbo from dying from a dream)The sedative they all took so that they could go down to the otherwise unreachable third dream level causes their heavily sedated subconscious to go into limbo. It's like the sedative is so strong that if you die in the dream you essentially go into a coma in real life. Saito 'dies' and goes to limbo, and after Cobb confesses to Ariadne about Mal he goes down there to find him, risking having to confront Mal again.then how did she get there?She's part of [Character who Leonardo plays]'s subconscious.
The plot twists in MGS4. They didn't bother to explain a damned thing.both her and Leonard went to limbo before the sedative and then left and then she killed herself. beat that.In a flashback story in inception they both go to limbo, all of this unfolds before it was possible to die in the dream.Mal committed suicide in real life. Whenever Cobb is in a dream, his subconscious creates visions of her. I think you've got it all muddled up.she committed suicide because Leonard put the idea in her head in limbo. Then how did they get to limbo w/o the drug?
She's a projection of Cobb's subconcious.ayuri said:Nintendolover222 said:ayuri said:inceptionthey start the movie off where if you die in the dream you wake up, half way through they are in a state where if they die in the dream they die for real (also his wife went to limbo from dying from a dream)The sedative they all took so that they could go down to the otherwise unreachable third dream level causes their heavily sedated subconscious to go into limbo. It's like the sedative is so strong that if you die in the dream you essentially go into a coma in real life. Saito 'dies' and goes to limbo, and after Cobb confesses to Ariadne about Mal he goes down there to find him, risking having to confront Mal again.then how did she get there?