I.Muir said:
Farther than stars said:
I.Muir said:
So why then say such an unfounded statement? It may very well be just another person who fears something they don't understand and too old to try at their time of life. If that is the case how likely are they to make an unbiased and informed decision which would be using that intelligence they apparently posses.
And that's my point. She "
may very well be just another person who fears something [she] doesn't understand", but that's an assumption on your part. She may also have made that unbiased and informed decision, but just because it falls out against your side, you dismiss her as being "too old to try [and understand] at [her] time of life". And speaking of biases, that last part is just slander, plain and simple.
Well that's the thing.
I don't think any decision made against video games with such flimsy support to back it up CAN be an unbiased and informed decision. My personal bias does not help but as an example if It were up to me I wouldn't ban Justin Bieber music because it causes teen pregnancy without seeing some damn evidence of this being the case first.
Then again being a politician she may be blindly lashing out at something/ anything to please the people.
Remind me again exactly what part is slander and why?
I completely agree with the fact that it probably wasn't an informed decision, but in that case the best thing to do is write to her and explain your (/our) side of the argument. Telling the internet that she's too old to try and understand doesn't help anyone or anything, least of all the legislative process.
And as to why saying that she's too old to try and understand is slander, it's because it simply isn't true. Most politicians actually want to hear what their voters think. They
need to hear what's in the public's interest, because that's the only way they're going to survive as politicians.
To name Feinstein as an example; she was one of the co-sponsors of PIPA. Now, most of the advice that went into proposals such as SOPA and PIPA came from Hollywood and game and music publishers, because big business has a more efficient lobbying infrastructure in Washington. And it's not surprising that Feinstein sat up and took notice. After all, piracy has become a big problem and millions of jobs in entertainment industry are affected by it.
The SOPA/PIPA affair got publicity, other arguments came out against it and PIPA was dropped. That doesn't mean that Feinstein co-sponsored the act out of sheer neglect, but it also doesn't help to attack her competence. There isn't a single politician out there, or even a single person, who has a flawless record wherein they make the right choice on every single issue. If there was, that person would be president for ever.