FEichinger said:
Let's see ... How many people in this thread condemning ubisoft will buy AC3?
And how many of those will do so for the PC?
That said, I'm honestly surprised by how well it has been working for me. It's as much of a pile of shit as Origin and GFWL are, but at least it didn't fail me yet - but that's only because I keep avoiding always-on games as much as I can.
Edit: Also, I use Steam and thus only use the launcher part of uPlay, so ... I think I couldn't care less.
Well, AC3 won't have always on DRM. I heard you only activate once, and can do so on multiple computers.
So, I
might buy AC3 on launch. Maybe.
If by others' accounts the combat is actually interesting.
I mean Assassin's Creed is so easy it is almost as casual as CoD.
I'll play it eventually, sure, but casual games are not worth a AAA release's price tag.
Also, I would also like to see if the port is actually good. I mean sure, there are more bells and whistles on PC versions of other AC games, but the controls are a lot of fighting the camera.
Hello, PC, 1:1 mouselook is all you need to never have to fight the camera. People ***** about "auto aim" on consoles, but it's effectively "auto camera" ... and just as annoying in 3rd person games.
(Those Batman games are better with m&k controls than a controller, from a comparison standpoint)
So, if I have to end up playing with a controller anyway, and the game isn't challenging enough for me to record youtube footage, I might as well try it on the WiiU or something.
As for buying stuff off uPlay, we'll see.
If their prices are competitive, their download speed high, and the site navigation is speedy.
Most importantly, automatic updates.
'cos if you sit down to play a steamworks game, it's ready to play, right?
Not the case with origin .. which decides to patch stuff after you launch them.
I mean DRM sucks monkey balls, so you'd think something as simple as not having to wait on a patch would be the very least they can offer.
But noooo.