I think the difference is google isn't designed to do that like this website was which is why it can't be shut down but they are still getting lots of heat over pirate websites appearing in searches.Zer0Saber said:Doesn't Google do the same thing. You do a search for videos then Google provides links to websites with pirated videos to view, and Google makes money off of advertising.
I think it's time for the MPAA to start going after google now.Sober Thal said:Damn right, send em to jail.
When will you people learn that you shouldn't make money from IP theft? Probably never.
Reread the second paragraph. He got ten years for posting links to youtube videos, not to torrent sites. They could send the administrators of Tvtropes and this site to prison for the same thing.Sober Thal said:Damn right, send em to jail.
When will you people learn that you shouldn't make money from IP theft? Probably never.
So if he told bank robbers where you could buy illegal firearms that would be ok? He is crook plain and simple and he has rightly gone to jail.Kordie said:So... he directed people on where to go to watch tv including legal and illegal places...
This is rediculous that a mans life is ruined over sharing information that is already freely available. Also, how is generating ad revenue for this wrong? Wouldn't that make youtube punishable? and google? If I made the same website and just listed the illegal places under a seperate heading of BTW avoid these specific sites as they are not legal sources, would there still be a problem?
Nothing about this case seems on the level. I can agree that piracy is bad, but this is not the way to stop it.
Customers don't matter, you can't tell if your selling a gun to a mass murderer or a hunter. Second, if you asked me where to buy a gun and I said here is a list of 17 places that sell the gun you want including bills black market ally warehouse, then it is up to you the consumer to choose what store to go to. He pointed people to both legitimate and illegitimate sources, which is nothing a google search won't do already.albino boo said:So if he told bank robbers where you could buy illegal firearms that would be ok? He is crook plain and simple and he has rightly gone to jail.Kordie said:So... he directed people on where to go to watch tv including legal and illegal places...
This is rediculous that a mans life is ruined over sharing information that is already freely available. Also, how is generating ad revenue for this wrong? Wouldn't that make youtube punishable? and google? If I made the same website and just listed the illegal places under a seperate heading of BTW avoid these specific sites as they are not legal sources, would there still be a problem?
Nothing about this case seems on the level. I can agree that piracy is bad, but this is not the way to stop it.
Yes, but Google is much too powerful. Lobbying groups and businesses like this pick on the little guys that can't afford the top lawyers and favors in court.Loop Stricken said:And yet, Google do the same thing, and no doubt profit far more from advertising whilst doing so.
Why are you using something far worse that he didn't do as justification for this? He maybe deserves a small fine. He doesn't deserve jail. Hell, most people here have posted links to youtube videos that would probably be considered IP infringement. Do we deserve jailtime?albino boo said:So if he told bank robbers where you could buy illegal firearms that would be ok? He is crook plain and simple and he has rightly gone to jail.
". For those that are unaware FACT Ltd is the UK regional office of the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA)". So really Google and Youtube should totally be liable, but they aren't because money talks.Agow95 said:Isn't Google a American company though? FACT is based in Britain, and it's most likely only capable of arresting sites based in the UK, like the one that got this British guy arrested, FACT trying to arrest the head of Google would be like the FBI launching a full-scale assault on a fat man in New Zealand.Loop Stricken said:And yet, Google do the same thing, and no doubt profit far more from advertising whilst doing so.
I felt it ever since the Tories got a majority in the commons on election night.alexbuckenham said:Can't help the feeling we're falling into a corporate run dystopian era