Read what I said a few posts up. No-one is going to get irreversibly castrated if the evidence doesn't prove their undisputable guilt.Matthew94 said:So what if the person is wrongfully convicted?MammothBlade said:I don't think I like your idea of "enlightened".Matthew94 said:And that's only page 1.
For such an "enlightened" society you are all shockingly morbid. The guy committed a crime and he will be punished, your medieval style justice helps no one and would most likely make the issue worse.
Far from being barbaric or medieval as you call it, a strong justice system is a characteristic of a modern, civilised society. In my view, that means strong, often physical punishments for those who prey upon those weaker than them. Rehabilitation is an afterthought. The victim's rights are paramount.
Would you be happy to have someone, and I quote "castrated, painfully" because of a wrongful conviction?
Many people are happy with the way justice works right now except when it comes to pedophiles and then everyone marches out with their pitchforks and want to start a lynch mob.
I'm guessing while we are at it we should ring back the iron maiden and various other tools of "punishment".
To the contrary, there are plenty of people who demand capital punishment for murder. The system is overall too soft on crimes of a violent and sexual nature.
I think some accommodations should be made. The iron maiden would make a suitable punishment tool for those who maim and torture innocents; a hundred lashes and other light corporal punishment would be suitable for petty thugs.