UK Schools to report parents to the police if they allow their children to play 18 rated games.

CymbaIine

New member
Aug 23, 2013
168
0
0
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-32103991


Head teachers in Cheshire have warned parents they will report them to the authorities if they allow their children to play computer games rated for over-18s.

The letter was sent by the Nantwich Education Partnership group to parents from 16 schools in the county.

The heads claim games such as Grand Theft Auto and Call of Duty contain unsuitable levels of violence.
They warn parents they could be reported for neglect in some cases.
Nantwich Education Partnership (who have sent the letter) are made up of both primary and secondary schools.

The letter is here

http://www.audlem.org/newsroom/nantwich-education-partnership.html

...Call of Duty, Grand Theft Auto, Dogs of War and other similar games, are all inappropriate for
children and they should not have access to them.

[...]

We need to inform you all of the actions we are advised to take and why:

-If your child is allowed to have inappropriate access to any game or associated product that is designated 18+ we will are [sic] advised to contact the Police and Children's Social Care as it is neglectful.
 

Queen Michael

has read 4,010 manga books
Jun 9, 2009
10,400
0
0
Oh goodie. As I woke up today, I was thinking that the world doesn't suck enough and somebody needs to get on that.
 

tm96

New member
Feb 1, 2014
200
0
0
Just why? Isn't it a parent's job to decide if something is appropriate for their child? It just seems like a odd and dumb move to me.
 

Elfgore

Your friendly local nihilist
Legacy
Dec 6, 2010
5,655
24
13
And I hope the Police that get those reports burst out laughing in those teachers' faces. Same for the Social Care people.

And I'm sorry, Dogs of War? Do you mean Gears of War? Unless it's some game I've never heard of, at least know the fucking names of what you're being idiots about.
 

L. Declis

New member
Apr 19, 2012
861
0
0
Elfgore said:
And I'm sorry, Dogs of War? Do you mean Gears of War? Unless it's some game I've never heard of, at least know the fucking names of what you're being idiots about.
I thought it was God of War.

I also believe that it's only 18+ for purchase, not to play, and an adult can make the choice to let a child play it.

Finally, this is what they're focusing on?

Not the massive child rape increase, not the huge divide between poorer and richer families, not the massive drug use or teenage pregnancy increase, but "oh no, Timmy played Call of Duty and called someone a fag online".

Plus there was that National Student forum which declared that gay people are no longer allowed to do anything like a black women, the theatrical tradition of "drag" is now transphobic and forbidden, and people must now do jazz hands because clapping makes people too anxious.

This is my country. God helps us all.
 

Mithcha

New member
Oct 21, 2011
90
0
0
I'm not sure the police / social services even have the power the heads think they do - the police can certainly go at a shop for selling an 18+ to an under-age gamer but I'm not sure that have any power outside of that? Everything I've read refers to them as a 'guideline' when it comes to parents. I've certainly never heard of a case where the police or social services for that matter, took legal action over a parent letting a child play GTA or what have you unless it became part of a wider thing (murder or something and the parent said "he played it!!!?!?!?!?!".
 

tippy2k2

Beloved Tyrant
Legacy
Mar 15, 2008
14,337
1,530
118
Will that actually do anything though?

Are UK laws different than us here in 'Merica because the ESRB (and the MPAA and whatnot) have no legal authority; stores voluntarily follow the ratings. You could report me all day for allowing a ten year old to play Grant Theft Auto while listening to "Fuck the Police" on eternal loop with Hostel playing in the picture-in-picture and there would be no legal leg for anyone to stand on to have me arrested.

This also seems like one of those things that will backfire horribly as I don't think I've known a single parent who has ever had a hard stance on ratings because, shockingly, kids are individuals. There are probably a handful of "Footloose" style parents where those kids are not allowed to listen to that devil music rock & roll or dance because dancing is basically having sex but the vast majority of parents are smarter than that.
 

mecegirl

New member
May 19, 2013
737
0
0
Stranger things have happened in the US. Like this case.http://www.cnn.com/2014/07/21/living/mom-arrested-left-girl-park-parents/

While yeah, its not exactly advisable for under 18 to play mature games its all gonna depend on that kid. Obviously the younger they are the less likely they will be to separate fiction from reality. But some 13 year olds could understand it, and in contrast some 16 year olds would be badly effected. All we can do is hope that the parents are communicating with their kids about all the media they consume.
 

Seishisha

By the power of greyskull.
Aug 22, 2011
473
0
0
This can't be real, the idea is just too stupid.

Firstly what authority do the schools in question think they have to be able to call the police over a choice of entertainment media? I can understand banning such things from school grounds but more than that is just overreaching to the extreme.

Secondly what proof would the schools even have that the kids are playing these games in their homes, also why just games there are plenty of other forms of media with an adult rating that could be in the home. Movies and music with explict themes or lyrics not to mention the damn internet that has litteraly illegal content one google search away.

This is just fucking bonkers and any parent or even a brain dead sea-urchin could see that.
 
Aug 31, 2012
1,774
0
0
Eh? What does that matter? It's not illegal for an under 18 to watch nor play an 18 rated film or game, it's just the purchase (or watching in a cinema) that's illegal. If mum and dad say it's ok, then it's ok, there's no legal problem there.
 

Mister K

This is our story.
Apr 25, 2011
1,703
0
0
OK, firstly, age ratings arent some kind of legal regulation, they are advisory symbols at best. There is no penalty for not following them.

Secondly, and exactly how will they proove that I bought my child this game? Obviously my kid buys all games by him/herself, I only give weekly allowences and like hell I'll ever let anyone use my cards.
 

Thaluikhain

Elite Member
Legacy
Jan 16, 2010
18,682
3,591
118
Would this have gone down the same if this was about parents allowing kids to watch porn?
 
Aug 31, 2012
1,774
0
0
Unkillable Cat said:
Labelling

The Video Recordings (Labelling) Regulations 2012 specifies the labelling requirements for video recordings and video games.

The classification symbol, descriptor icon (for video games), the unique title (including the registered number) and the explanatory statement (for video recordings), where required by the Regulations, must be clearly legible, indelible and not hidden or obscured. The Regulations set out where the classification symbol and descriptor icon labels and markings must be shown on the packaging for video recordings and video games and on the disc or other electronic device.

It is illegal for a retailer to supply or offer to supply a video recording that does not comply with labelling requirements. For a full list of offences under the Video Recordings Act 1984 see the 'Penalties' section of this guide.

Up to six months' imprisonment and/or £5,000 fine:

section 11 - supplying a video game or recording to a person who has not attained the age specified in the classification certificate unless the supply is, or would be if it took place, an exempted supply

Despite what you may think, it IS illegal, this is from the trading standards regulation.
Note the use of the word "retailer". That is trading standards. Parents are free to let their children watch/play 18 rated films/games. It may become an issue in a wider case of neglect, but on it's own it's not illegal. For example, parents are allowed to let their children drink alcohol at home, but if it becomes obvious they're getting pissed all the time social services might be called in.
 

CymbaIine

New member
Aug 23, 2013
168
0
0
thaluikhain said:
Would this have gone down the same if this was about parents allowing kids to watch porn?
Possibly not but then it is not the same thing. The primary reason (indeed the only reason) for watching porn is sexual titillation. That isn't the case for video games.

tippy2k2 said:
Will that actually do anything though?
If the schools report this as a safeguarding issue most social services departments would investigate as standard. Investigate is a very broad term in this context and may just mean questioning the reporter for more details then taking no further action. However it is standard practice to then send a letter to parents to let them know they were investigated. The police would likely defer to social services to determine if there was a crime as neglect laws (and all child protection laws) are very vague.

It's scare tactics, most parents are scared of social services and have very little understanding of their role and powers.
 

Seishisha

By the power of greyskull.
Aug 22, 2011
473
0
0
Unkillable Cat said:
Despite what you may think, it IS illegal, this is from the trading standards regulation.
Im pretty sure what you quoted there applies only to retailer's, once the product has been purchased legally it is up to the consumer to decide its usage. The only laws i can find for the UK are those of the BBFC and PEGI ratings boards, both state they are simply guidlines and that national law often falls in line with the ratings system.

On the enforcable legal side action can only be taken against retailer's selling the items to underage clients.

The only law i can find for transfer of goods is called straw purchasing.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_purchase

All the examples listed here as illegal are pretty straight forward, firearms, alchohol and fraudulent aquisition of money, no mention of entertainment media.

To quote the page directly:

"straw purchases are legal except in cases where the ultimate receiver of goods or services uses those goods or services in the commission of a crime with the prior knowledge of the straw purchaser, or if the ultimate possessor is not legally able to purchase the goods/services. In some jurisdictions straw purchases are legal in spite of the fact that the end user is not legally able to purchase the good or service himself."

That could potentialy include entertainment media but the wording is far too vauge to be certain. It seems ultimatly the descison to puruse legal action because of straw purchasing lies with the local/national courts and they probably have better things todo than that.
 

Lufia Erim

New member
Mar 13, 2015
1,420
0
0
Oooooh. please oh please do it to a rich white kid whos parents have enough money to sue the shool for all they're worth!
 

teqrevisited

New member
Mar 17, 2010
2,343
0
0
Sounds like nothing more than a colossal waste of police time and resources.

But my opinion doesn't really count as I used to play GTA when I was 10 and now I'm a mass-murderer wanted for innumerable horrific crimes in 17 different countries.
 

Seishisha

By the power of greyskull.
Aug 22, 2011
473
0
0
teqrevisited said:
Sounds like nothing more than a colossal waste of police time and resources.

But my opinion doesn't really count as I used to play GTA when I was 10 and now I'm a mass-murderer wanted for innumerable horrific crimes in 17 different countries.
I suppose your also a serial arsonist who kicks puppies, since you know games and all made you into a sociopath. Oh gawd what's that noise behind me... why do you have an axe and ... how did you even get in my house...