Bruce Willis said, just last month mind you, that M. Night was still thinking of a sequel, and he had a villain in mind, but is using the character in a new upcoming film of his instead.Starke said:The original Special Edition of the DVD shipped with a pair of Alex Ross water color post cards. One was of Dunn in that raincoat. The other was Mr. Glass outside on a sunny day. Still, it was an absolutely badass shot of him.Josh Kurber said:]I enjoy the scene where after he falls in the pool, and he is wearing that raincoat, and he looks like a bad ass. And sneaking up behind the janitor he honestly reminds me of Assassin's Creed lol. The hood up and everything, the sneak attacking. I LOVED this movie.Starke said:Basically you're nailing all the reasons I love this film. The one other stand out is the way every shot is framed. Even the moving shots are consistent with behavior zooming the way a comic will from panel to panel or are straight tracking shots (which replicate other panel configurations. The long hold shot in Willis in the ER with the patient bleeding out in front of him is also very reminiscent of comic panels. It's one wide shot, with no camera movement whatsoever. In films this is actually really rare, but in comic books it isn't the slightest bit uncommon to do a single large cover, with one element progressing from panel to panel independent of the dialog.Blind Sight said:I love that movie, especially the comic book symbolism throughout it. The janitor in the orange jumpsuit and Bruce Willis' big green raincoat are pretty much costumes, the combination of reality and a comic book setting was really well done. Especially at the end where Jackson's character talks about how his relationship with Willis is pretty much how superhero and supervillains are introduced, and his end line "You know how I knew I was the bad guy? It was the name kids used to call me. Mr. Glass. They called me Mr. Glass." was chilling.
I'm quite retarded to the facts of symbolism unless I knowingly look for them. But now that you mention it, that is really awesome lolQuantum Roberts said:Im kinda surprised no one comented on the symbolism of Dunn's raincoat? I mean it says "Security"! In fact looking back on it now, Its a double entendre!! Wow!! First of all its his duty as a superhero and secondly its what the coat provides him and his real identity!
I was actually just thinking about that.Quantum Roberts said:Im kinda surprised no one comented on the symbolism of Dunn's raincoat? I mean it says "Security"! In fact looking back on it now, Its a double entendre!! Wow!! First of all its his duty as a superhero and secondly its what the coat provides him and his real identity!
The one in Rising Stars was vulnerable to asphyxiation or drowning. So it kinda makes sense. In his case it was a molecular barrier around his body that prevented him from touching or feeling anything. But, same general concept.Josh Kurber said:But an invincible man? No one would see that to be his weakness at all.
I will try my best.Josh Kurber said:Yes, my friend. Yes you should.C95J said:never watched it... should I?
Besides, Superman is weak against a rock. A rock people. Lex Luthor: No worries. Darksied: Not a sweat but you give him a green rock...Starke said:The one in Rising Stars was vulnerable to asphyxiation or drowning. So it kinda makes sense. In his case it was a molecular barrier around his body that prevented him from touching or feeling anything. But, same general concept.Josh Kurber said:But an invincible man? No one would see that to be his weakness at all.
I know asphyxiation means suffocating, or something, but everytime I hear the word I think of someone wanking themselves with a noose around their neck O_eStarke said:The one in Rising Stars was vulnerable to asphyxiation or drowning. So it kinda makes sense. In his case it was a molecular barrier around his body that prevented him from touching or feeling anything. But, same general concept.Josh Kurber said:But an invincible man? No one would see that to be his weakness at all.
My sister showed that movie to me last year. A very, very fine film. It is a shame the director is falling apart now as this movie was amazing.Josh Kurber said:I just watched this movie moments ago, and I love it. The superhero film starring Bruce Willis.
This movie reminded me how amazing M. Night Shyamalan's movies used to/could be. Signs, Sixth Sense, Unbreakable. I loved these movies, and there's been talk of a sequel. I would LOVE a sequel to this film.
Have you guys seen this movie? What did you think about it? (And yes, I realize this is random, but nostalgia is always fun lol)
That's auto-erotic asphyxiation. Not quite the same thing.Josh Kurber said:I know asphyxiation means suffocating, or something, but everytime I hear the word I think of someone wanking themselves with a noose around their neck O_eStarke said:The one in Rising Stars was vulnerable to asphyxiation or drowning. So it kinda makes sense. In his case it was a molecular barrier around his body that prevented him from touching or feeling anything. But, same general concept.Josh Kurber said:But an invincible man? No one would see that to be his weakness at all.
And I am used to most superheroes I hear about to have pretty obvious weaknesses. Well... Superman, only because I grew up hearing him. Or, I just THINK I find the weaknesses obvious... hmm...
You didn't like Signs? I find that Signs and Sixth Sense still give me chills every so often. As odd as that sounds. Though it could stem from being a firm believer in the paranormal xDAlpha1089 said:I've seen Unbreakable and I quite liked it. Same goes for The Sixth Sense. A sequel to Unbreakable could be pretty cool actually. However, now that I know he's the guy behind the abomination known as Signs, I feel the urge to go out and light him on fire.
Oh I know, but just the word association makes me think of that.Starke said:That's auto-erotic asphyxiation. Not quite the same thing.Josh Kurber said:I know asphyxiation means suffocating, or something, but everytime I hear the word I think of someone wanking themselves with a noose around their neck O_eStarke said:The one in Rising Stars was vulnerable to asphyxiation or drowning. So it kinda makes sense. In his case it was a molecular barrier around his body that prevented him from touching or feeling anything. But, same general concept.Josh Kurber said:But an invincible man? No one would see that to be his weakness at all.
And I am used to most superheroes I hear about to have pretty obvious weaknesses. Well... Superman, only because I grew up hearing him. Or, I just THINK I find the weaknesses obvious... hmm...
I'm going to text dump this here on account of being about to pass out in case anyone wondered: Rising Stars was a miniseries by J. Michael Straczynski (of Babylon 5 and Spider-Man fame), about a generation of children from a small town that grew up to become superheros (well, to have super powers). It follows them over the course of about fifty or sixty years. A really good read, though it does tread the same general conceptual territory as Watchmen.