Underappreciated books

Mr Somewhere

New member
Mar 9, 2011
455
0
0
Drunkbot said:
I was speaking with others in regards to our reading habits, and was astonished that while all of them claimed to enjoy the horror genre (to which I am at best an occasional fan), none of them had ever heard of The Monk, which is essentially the original horror novel.

What books do you think deserve more attention than they receive, fiction, or non?
The Monk is a few decades late of being the original horror novel...
Anyways, on topic...
Man Plus, is classic science fiction novel that I've heard few people actually mention. It's a great modern classic in the fine tradition of mid-twentieth century science fiction. Plus it has a neat Frankenstein touch, and I love Frankenstein... so there.
Plus it's a wonderful study of alienation and humanity in the light of an increasingly thecnologically based society. And it's got cyborgs, I swear the book was written for me.
 

Mr Somewhere

New member
Mar 9, 2011
455
0
0
U235 Is The Bomb said:
Vandenberg1 said:
H.P.Lovecraft... How many of you actuallyyy read it instead of just looking at fanfiction stuff?
The problem I've always had with Lovecraft, and all horror for that matter, is that I am not scared by anything that I read or watch. So, reading Lovecraft, I found myself reading on only for the sake of reading on. I mean, the first half of At The Mountains Of Madness was a Arctic explorer going crazy by staring at rock formations. Although Lovecraft is is no way a bad writer, I just never found it terribly interesting.
But that isn't the purpose of horror, nor did the genre start with such a title either. It was Gothic fiction, characterised by a gloomy atmosphere. It wasn't the direct intention to frighten the reader beyond belief, but to unsettle, the scares are part of the work, it doesn't rely entirely on it, or at least a good work shouldn't. Horror or Gothic fiction delivers a different, morose outlook on the world, the fear adds to the oppressive atmosphere. Horror works the same level as science fiction, it's an examination of life through an impossible angle. It takes life, throws it into a nightmare and investigates the results of our darker natures.
 

goater24

New member
Feb 5, 2008
528
0
0
Books by Michael Marshall Smith. One of us, Only Forward and Spares are amazing. Huge fan of Neil Gaimans American Gods but dont think thats underappreciated
 

Mr Somewhere

New member
Mar 9, 2011
455
0
0
U235 Is The Bomb said:
Mr Somewhere said:
U235 Is The Bomb said:
Vandenberg1 said:
H.P.Lovecraft... How many of you actuallyyy read it instead of just looking at fanfiction stuff?
The problem I've always had with Lovecraft, and all horror for that matter, is that I am not scared by anything that I read or watch. So, reading Lovecraft, I found myself reading on only for the sake of reading on. I mean, the first half of At The Mountains Of Madness was a Arctic explorer going crazy by staring at rock formations. Although Lovecraft is in no way a bad writer, I just never found it terribly interesting.
But that isn't the purpose of horror, nor did the genre start with such a title either. It was Gothic fiction, characterised by a gloomy atmosphere. It wasn't the direct intention to frighten the reader beyond belief, but to unsettle, the scares are part of the work, it doesn't rely entirely on it, or at least a good work shouldn't. Horror or Gothic fiction delivers a different, morose outlook on the world, the fear adds to the oppressive atmosphere. Horror works the same level as science fiction, it's an examination of life through an impossible angle. It takes life, throws it into a nightmare and investigates the results of our darker natures.
You are absolutely right about the genre of Lovecraftian stories. They aren't specifically horrors, but they do have a horror-like edge that is critical to the novel. In fact, Lovecraft almost introduced the concept of 'weird fiction': a mix of horror, science fiction, and fantasy. However, since I care very little for the horror elements of his work, I found the whole book a little tiresome; the fact that the book relied heavily on the reader's own interest in mythical, god-like creatures whilst remaining somewhat vague about them in all aspects but appearance (which he takes several paragraphs to describe) meant that I was often left very uninterested in both the characters and the plot.

And I also understand that most of Lovecraft's work was based on his own fears and nightmares, which he recreated in his stories in the form of beast-like monsters and the insanities of his characters. I did find his imagery in his works very clever, and the creatures he imagines and describes are genuinely intresting. However, since I don't share his interest in nightmarish creations, I was just bored whilst reading through his stories. I found the suspense dragging, and the way his characters often go spontaneously fruitloopy bat-guano little bit silly. Which was a bit of a pity, as most people who I talk to who have read Lovecraft have told me that they had found his stories very interesting and chilling. Well, maybe I'm just boring.
Very good points. But, I actually think the intended response of his stories are the implied pointlessness of existence and the absolute dominance of said lovecraftian creatures. In Lovecraft's universe, we are painted as being at the mercy of celestial whim, which, is true. Lovecraft's mythological creatures are ironic in that they aren't god's, they're powerful creatures beyond our comprehension, labelled gods because we don't know any better. They fell to our Earth by chance and can destroy us in an instant. Lovecraft's power is his ability to portray a useless universe where we are but insects without hope.
But, again, being a fan of his works, I'll be the first to admit he can be very silly... I think that's part of the charm.
 

gyroscopeboy

New member
Nov 27, 2010
601
0
0
rabidmidget said:
I don't think I have met anyone who has read catch-22, which is a shame considering it's probably the wittiest book I've ever read.
Yes! More people should read this book! The entire work is literary genius...and Yossarian is fucking insane! :D
 

bluepotatosack

New member
Mar 17, 2011
499
0
0
The Master and Margarita by Mikhail Bulgakov.

Amazing book. It's essentially about the devil showing up with his entourage (one member of which is a giant talking cat with a fondness for chess and vodka) in Moscow. It's time for the Devil's Ball and he needs to find the titular guests of honor. Much mayhem is caused, a poet is driven mad, and another one realizes everything he's written has been meaningless...

Oh, and it's also about Jesus and Pontius Pilate. And of course, since it was written in Soviet Russia in the '30's it was banned for a few decades.
 

ChieftainStag

Regular Member
Apr 14, 2011
73
0
11
I liked the book "Heir Apparent" although the end cuts off just maybe a few pages short, (in my opinion)
 

Vandenberg1

New member
May 26, 2011
360
0
0
I'd argue the movie was better and thought provoking then book lol. Maybe I just seen too many haunted house movies... I mean the freaking lawn creatures came alive in book..kinda silly..
 

Ledbetter

New member
May 5, 2011
12
0
0
Dear goodness yes, Sword of Truth Series and Monster Blood Tattoo, both amazing series that could use more readers, though, to admit near the tenth books Goodkind gets a little preachy.
 

Ledbetter

New member
May 5, 2011
12
0
0
ChromaticWolfen said:
Orcs by Stan Nicholls, when I look it up it barely comes up.
That also makes me sad, because that book series is great, with the orcs having their own culture instead of being portrayed as just some mindless raging green monsters.