I have the entire series. My copy of the first book is called the golden compass. It was published before the release of the movie.ComprehensiveGoo said:I think the novel's actually called Northern Lights by Philip PullmanKadoodle said:Byr0m said:This as well, I can't believe they renamed it :S ITS NOT A COMPASS ITS AN ALETHIOMETER AND I DON'T CARE IF IT LOOKS LIKE ONEHeathrow said:The Golden Compass still sticks out in my mind for shear volume of wasted potential.
EDIT:This isn't the only gripe I had about it but the rest is standard affair stuff when you convert a book to a film -.-
They didn't rename it. That's the name of the first book in the series.and it's a part of his Dark Materials
Yea, that makes sense considering I know my collection starts with the Northern Lights.. It's the same situation with Harry Potter and the Philosophers Stone me thinks..Kadoodle said:I have the entire series. My copy of the first book is called the golden compass. It was published before the release of the movie.ComprehensiveGoo said:I think the novel's actually called Northern Lights by Philip PullmanKadoodle said:Byr0m said:This as well, I can't believe they renamed it :S ITS NOT A COMPASS ITS AN ALETHIOMETER AND I DON'T CARE IF IT LOOKS LIKE ONEHeathrow said:The Golden Compass still sticks out in my mind for shear volume of wasted potential.
EDIT:This isn't the only gripe I had about it but the rest is standard affair stuff when you convert a book to a film -.-
They didn't rename it. That's the name of the first book in the series.and it's a part of his Dark Materials
Perhaps that's just the title for the US publishing of it.
You might be right there, but I think I read something about a confusion because of the cover art, it might have been wikipedia so it can't be trusted 100%. And seriously... agreed on Harry Potter. There was no god damn reason to change that name.Flatfrog said:I think it's not quite that way. I think the Golden Compass name came as a back-formation from the pattern of the two sequels, The Subtle Knife and The Amber Spyglass - they wanted to make the trilogy feel more coherent. Not a bad idea, really, and it is a kind of compass, just one that points to ideas rather than places.Yopaz said:Actually the name of the movie is because a bad translation from English To English. Released in England as Northern Lights, then it was due to be released in USA and they saw there was something that looked slightly like a compass. They said "Dude, there's a compass on the cover of the book, this can't be named Northern Lights. Americans are stupid and will get confused if they see a name that doesn't include the word compass."Byr0m said:This as well, I can't believe they renamed it :S ITS NOT A COMPASS ITS AN ALETHIOMETER AND I DON'T CARE IF IT LOOKS LIKE ONEHeathrow said:The Golden Compass still sticks out in my mind for shear volume of wasted potential.
EDIT:This isn't the only gripe I had about it but the rest is standard affair stuff when you convert a book to a film -.-
I was far more annoyed by the renaming of 'Philosopher's Stone' to 'Sorceror's Stone'. Philosopher's Stone actually means something, dammit!
This. I want my money back and my time and the loss of brain cells from having to sit through this garbage. The 2nd one as well. As far as I'm concerned, The Matrix had no sequels.Irriduccibilli said:The Matrix 3.. Why god WHY did you fuck up the trilogy so bad?
THey renamed it? I read the book and the title of the book is The Golden Compass... I think i'm missing something, did they stop calling it the alethiometer inside the movie and only refer to it as the Golden Compass?Byr0m said:This as well, I can't believe they renamed it :S ITS NOT A COMPASS ITS AN ALETHIOMETER AND I DON'T CARE IF IT LOOKS LIKE ONEHeathrow said:The Golden Compass still sticks out in my mind for shear volume of wasted potential.
EDIT:This isn't the only gripe I had about it but the rest is standard affair stuff when you convert a book to a film -.-
I think it was that the devices was okay but stealing ides bad and implanting ides very bad.The whole movie was weird and would be better as a horror movie because then it would be a bit better story because now the whole plot twist was that he was dreaming all along or did he? *dramatic sound* after the whole shit leading up to that point I did not care anymore.Witty Name Here said:Two movies that I'm probably going to be stoned as a heathen for disliking...
One, Scott Pilgrim vs The World, saw it with my family, I just thought it was boring not anything that 'defines a generation' in the slightest, while my parents thought it was made up entirely of Stoner Humor.
Two, Inception, I just really disliked this film even though I thought I should have. Maybe it's because my younger brother was talking during it so I missed a few lines, but it just didn't explain much and I really disliked that one College Girl's performance in the film. I believe my biggest problem was that I didn't really understand how a group of thieves managed to GET a device that allowed them to enter people's dreams (although I think a friend mentioned something about because they worked for some shadowy corporation) And second, when they mentioned to the girl that they literally went into people's minds and stole their ideas (or in the case of the movie, planted them) she didn't even seem shocked at all, is this a world where the average citizen KNOWS that people have the ability to go in your dreams and take your ideas or make you think new ones? If that's true, why aren't there riots in the streets then? People were screaming socialism and wanted to take down the american government just when democrats try to pass a bill to fix healthcare, wouldn't they just have a field day if they discovered the government created a device that would allow them to steal the thoughts of your average Joe, or even worse, plant thoughts to make him become a super-patriot and 'defender of america'?
EDIT: I also don't get why some of my friends were raving over Shaun of the Dead, I really didn't see it as that funny, I've laughed more at Will Ferrel movies to be honest... (Not trying to offend anyone, I just really didn't find the film that humorous)
God, I hate bond films. Seen one seen them all, there is always the same scenes (except for this one obviously), there is always the "love making" scene, the gadget, the car scene, the "no, I expect you to die" but you will actually escape scene, which is always coupled with the "let me explain my plan to you before I leave so I can't stop you from escaping", theres the sneaking in to the baddies base and of course the sneaking out .... later followed by sneaking back in and there is always the "I have blown everything up, killed the main baddie, stopped the evil plot and here are the reinforcements that are far too late" scene.Quaxar said:The new Bond, Daniel Craig. It's just the same like any other action film...
Where's the gentleman? The gadgets? The Bond-girls? Also, I think it was the first film to not end with Bond seducing the female main role.
idk, sleep now in a fire might be good for lighting up aliensCaptain Pancake said:That's the first thing I thought of when I heard of this film. Testify or calm like a bomb perhaps.sessionxiii said:OT:Battle LA soundtrack better use a song from the album Battle of Los Angeles, or I will really be disappointed.
We had 40 years of that.Quaxar said:The new Bond, Daniel Craig. It's just the same like any other action film...
Where's the gentleman? The gadgets? The Bond-girls? Also, I think it was the first film to not end with Bond seducing the female main role.