This is a question about science. I'm hoping to become a physicist, so I'd better start figuring this shit out. I'm posting here because I really just want a quick answer.
One of the fundamental things a hypothesis must be to be considered scientific is falsifiable. But this idea does not seem to preclude the thing being verified. I can't think of anything unfalsifiable that is verified, but could there be such a thing?
Of course, I'm only talking about something being unfalsifiable in principle, not in practice. Russel's teapot is practically unfalsifiable, but if we actually found a teapot, it would be verified.
I don't know if I'm making myself clear, but I keep forgetting to ask this. Can something unfalsifiable in principle conceivably be verified?
One of the fundamental things a hypothesis must be to be considered scientific is falsifiable. But this idea does not seem to preclude the thing being verified. I can't think of anything unfalsifiable that is verified, but could there be such a thing?
Of course, I'm only talking about something being unfalsifiable in principle, not in practice. Russel's teapot is practically unfalsifiable, but if we actually found a teapot, it would be verified.
I don't know if I'm making myself clear, but I keep forgetting to ask this. Can something unfalsifiable in principle conceivably be verified?