Actually, this is false. Cancer rates are comparable to what they used to be although there are some fluctuations. Lung cancer is decreased in some portions of the world due to awareness of the effect of smoking, ovarian cancer is on the decrease because of the HPV vaccine, colorectal cancer is quite high in some places due to intake of red meat. Diagnostics are improving, treatment is improving. Because of this more patients get diagnosed and more patients survive for a longer time.Trollhoffer said:Our increasingly artificial lives appear to have some effect on cancer acquisition rates, plus the age groups as risk. People are getting cancer at earlier times in their lives. This might have to do with increasing medical awareness of cancer conditions, but it's also likely that our changing world influences this as well. We breath corrupted air, eat food with high preservative contents, live sedentary lifestyles, and shun sunlight. This provides our bodies with incentives to mutate in order to adapt, while lowering the likes of vitamin D content in our bodies that exist, in part, to help us fight infection. Between 11% and 25% of us are likely to develop some kind of cancer that requires medical treatment in our lifespans.
Again this is not strictly true. Your immune system is not efficient at detecting the difference between cancerous cells and healthy cells, although it can. Cancer cells offer difficulties because they are not strictly foreign, they are still your cells and display many of the same characteristics making them tricky. Our most important safeguard is in the cells themselves. Cells with bad mutations are often simply prevented from dividing because the cell cycle is regulated by several important checkpoints. If DNA damage is detected and it can't be fixed then a cell may go through apoptosis or enter an irreversible state called senescence. It's not referred to as cancer unless a malignant tumour arises.Many of us, perhaps most of us, have had cancer and defeated it without knowing. Usually, the body's immune system will detect "foreign" influences and destroy them. This may have been over a period of days or even hours. Cancer is simply a natural mutation that runs right out of control, and in some cases, becomes a tumour (or tumours) that require operations, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and/or other treatments.
As I understand it is uncommon to develop two primary cancers around the same time but not as unusual as you might expect. But given that they've already conducted tests and declared it inoperable I'd guess that they've already done tests to confirm metastasis.davidmc1158 said:Out of curiosity, what is the likelihood of the material on his liver being a separate cancer entirely? I mean, if the spots on his liver come from a separate source and are not the metastasized cells from the colon cancer.Lightspeaker said:Source: I'm a Doctor of Molecular Biology. Though as a disclaimer I'm not a cancer researcher (was working on blindness until earlier this year), if there are any around they'll know far more about it than I do.
The fact that his cancer was originally bowel cancer and is now in the liver is pretty much proof positive that its metastasized. It sucks to be honest, I'd been sincerely hoping that the poor guy had managed to get rid of it outright.
I have very little knowledge on the subject and am always asking question because of that curiosity.
He had colon cancer recently and based upon what info he's passed on it sounds like the liver cancer is secondary. Which means its metastasised already and is already spread throughout the body.vallorn said:Here's hoping that things work out, it might be inoperable but it's not untreatable. The issue is the placement of the cancer, the liver processes a lot of the body's poisons into things that we excrete, everything from old blood cells to excess amino acids get broken down by the liver then excreted via the kidneys and bladder sometime later on. Because of that, the liver has a lot of bloodflow through it so if one of those small cancers starts releasing cancer cells into his bloodstream then things are going to go south very, very quickly.
Not to be a total downer, but barring medical breakthroughs, the cancer's broke containment, meaning cancer cells have traveled from the original site via the bloodstream and are everywhere, too small to see until it grows sufficiently. That the liver was the first to show up is no surprise as its got the best nutrients and blood flow through most of the body. The idea now is to maintain treatment to minimize its growth while maintaining a certain QoL. Hopefully there won't be an recurrence in places like his lymph nodes or brain.Exley97 said:Fuck this disease. This is awful news. Here's hoping he beats it a second time and lives a long, happy life.
I know he's said this a while back, but it's worth repeating: in lieu of donations to him personally, Bain asked folks to donate to charities like Bowel Cancer UK. http://www.bowelcanceruk.org.uk/
You have an entire forum in which to grind your axes against Ms. Sarkeesian and her hypothetical fans. A man is dying. If you're as big a fan as you appear to be, show some respect and don't use his circumstances as ammunition in an outrage Olympiad.Leoofmoon said:When he is gone there is gonna be a hole and I can already see a bunch of assholes wanting to shit in that whole. I already saw a bunch of angry Anita fans say "I hope the cancer takes you" all because Anita did not win a award. This kinds of people are very shallow individuals and only seek to pull others down instead of improving themselves.
My gripe wasn't with her but her fans and unless you're missing the rest of my post I talk more about TB then her and even when I do again it's her FANS I talk about.BloatedGuppy said:You have an entire forum in which to grind your axes against Ms. Sarkeesian and her hypothetical fans. A man is dying. If you're as big a fan as you appear to be, show some respect and don't use his circumstances as ammunition in an outrage Olympiad.Leoofmoon said:When he is gone there is gonna be a hole and I can already see a bunch of assholes wanting to shit in that whole. I already saw a bunch of angry Anita fans say "I hope the cancer takes you" all because Anita did not win a award. This kinds of people are very shallow individuals and only seek to pull others down instead of improving themselves.
He doesn't want to receive donations directly? All right. Fifteen bucks going in that diretion.Exley97 said:Fuck this disease. This is awful news. Here's hoping he beats it a second time and lives a long, happy life.
I know he's said this a while back, but it's worth repeating: in lieu of donations to him personally, Bain asked folks to donate to charities like Bowel Cancer UK. http://www.bowelcanceruk.org.uk/
Sadly the issue isn't funding for a cure really its the location of the cancer itself. The liver inside the body as well as the heart have a lot to do with the blood inside a human body. The human heart pumps the blood and keeps things flowing while the Liver is the locations where many white blood cells are located and help filter and blood one's blood.erttheking said:Fucking Christ. There's gotta be SOMETHING people can do to help. Donations to help with treatment payment? Anything!
At least, that's what he tweeted last year. I have no idea if the situation changed and the costs from the current treatment are proving to be too much.erttheking said:He doesn't want to receive donations directly? All right. Fifteen bucks going in that diretion.Exley97 said:Fuck this disease. This is awful news. Here's hoping he beats it a second time and lives a long, happy life.
I know he's said this a while back, but it's worth repeating: in lieu of donations to him personally, Bain asked folks to donate to charities like Bowel Cancer UK. http://www.bowelcanceruk.org.uk/
Capatcha: Stony-hearted. Oh fuck you Capatcha.
EDIT: Ok, question for anyone who can answer it, the donations take pounds. If I donate ten pounds will it take the American equivalent out of my bank account?