I agree with you x100000. I'd take Modern Warfare Michael Bay setpieces any day over an indie game where the entire game is about rolling a duck into a hole. Give me big guns, big swords, big explosions and big overdramatic death scenes and I'll be happy. Maybe it's the fact that indie games seem really "hasty". I know that's because the budget is definitely low, but that doesn't change the fact that most of them look and play like something you'd find on Newgrounds from 2005. Am I the cancer that's killing the gaming industry?Vault101 said:I don't like indie games
really...with their "cute artsey ness" I just dont care
I like my guns, my set peices, my cutscenes, my AAA games thats what I like
With the exception of The Clash being the best band, I agree with you.Frostbyte said:I hate most Bronies. Not all of them, but most of them
I enjoy Runescape.
Nathan Drake isn't a tosspot, and I don't see why people hate him.
The 2008 Prince of Persia game wasn't crap.
Loading Ready Run isn't as funny as most people make it out to be. However, Unskippable and Feed Dump are highly underrated.
Dubstep is my least favorite genre of music.
The only good Oasis album was Morning Glory.
America is overrated (Coming from a Kiwi).
The Starwars prequels weren't that bad, and Jar-Jar Binks was kind of funny-ish.
I find nothing wrong with the use of Comic Sans. It's a nice and friendly font.
The Clash are the best band.
How many fan groups have I pissed off?
Why bother fighting it when you can tax it? Sheesh, it's not like the drug war is actually getting anywhere. If it was, it'd be over by now. Plus social darwinism, for all those naysayers. What's not to like?Luca72 said:I think medical marijuana is waste of time, and marijuana should be sold, taxed, and regulated like alcohol. That opinion seems to be accepted by about half the country.
But I also think all drugs should be legalized. Yep - morphine, amphetamines, you name it. Studies have shown that current policy doesn't reduce the tendency of people to get addicted to them, and that the major health problems people have as a result is because they're getting low-quality chemicals off the street.
If only cleanly made drugs were sold (and all these drugs have medical uses, so they ARE all produced cleanly by regulated companies as well) I think it would reduce fatalities and take a lot of money out of the black market. It's juvenile for politicians to think that restricting availability will stop people from using. There's really very little different between what we're doing now and what happened during Prohibition, whose only significant lasting effect was to strengthen the black market beyond belief.
HAHAHAHAHA..hahaha oh dear god...that imageBlack Arrow Officer said:I agree with you x100000. I'd take Modern Warfare Michael Bay setpieces any day over an indie game where the entire game is about rolling a duck into a hole. Give me big guns, big swords, big explosions and big overdramatic death scenes and I'll be happy. Maybe it's the fact that indie games seem really "hasty". I know that's because the budget is definitely low, but that doesn't change the fact that most of them look and play like something you'd find on Newgrounds from 2005. Am I the cancer that's killing the gaming industry?Vault101 said:I don't like indie games
really...with their "cute artsey ness" I just dont care
I like my guns, my set peices, my cutscenes, my AAA games thats what I like
[spoiler/][/spoiler]![]()
Spreading a virus with a 2/3rds mortality rate (like bird flu, which has recently been modified in a lab to spread between mammals (ferrets at least) and is the subject of great interest to bioterrorism experts, but which has provided some critically important data) is pretty retarded. You're not going to be able to control its spread and it'll probably end up shutting down countries almost entirely, as it rages through some areas, disproportionately wiping out some groups of people critical to a functioning society e.g. medical professionals, food transport and mass transit, petrol station and power station managers/workers etc.. Not to mention the dangers of people panicking and acting like asshats to each other out of mortal fear. No, while we're doing great damage to our environment, we have to learn to work together more cooperatively with a longer term viewpoint, not act completely chaotically. The 1918 swine flu epidemic was ~2% lethal and it caused major issues.azzair said:Ah, but there is the beauty of reducing the population, there are many, many ways to do it. Not all humane, and I would certainly not back them, but they are there. If we could change everyone's consumption over night, if there was a way to do it, even if it meant some sacrifice (economic probably) had to take place, I would rather that. But if faced with the over-consumption of resources, which means the end of the world as we know it and millions of people dying of starvation or some other related consequence, and we cannot change our consumption in time, there is always violence. Which would suck, suck big donkey cohones.
There are plenty of viruses out there which can be modified to have a 2/3 mortality rate, and its distribution would not be hard. A small deposit here, another there. TA DA! half the world is infected. It's wrong to even consider it a possibility, but it is one.
My approach would need it to be politically accepted however, and I would stick to it to my death. Violence would not be my resource, but it might be someone else's. In comparison, I find reducing the population my way to be humane, even if impractical.
thank you very much I think people who say fallout 3 sucks compared to new Vegas are mentally retardedneonsword13-ops said:Fallout 3 was better than New Vegas.
Atmosphere in 3 was superior in every way.
*Flameshield... UP!*
What should we have instead then?k3v1n said:- Democracy is a fucking joke.
Sorry, I just can't go past this.TheTurtleMan said:People with very poor living standards and income should not be allowed to have children. Not like the bottom 25% of income, I'm talkin' the lowest 4-5% of people that have their lives out of control and can barely support themselves, let alone a child. You should be able to prove that you have your shit together before taking on the biggest possible responsibility in life.
I also think that countries that have too many people should just ship a couple thousand over to Japan, one of the only first world countries that has a decreasing population. Japan seems to have their stuff in order and could give people better opportunities than a place like India or China.
The death penalty should be legal for confirmed criminals and the process should be sped up so people like Charles Manson don't sit in their cell and burn government money awaiting execution.
There should be a cap on money people make, lets say around 500 million or something else completely ridiculous, where anything after that goes directly to charity. I think that's actually something almost everyone can agree with.
And for the last thing, I think that the world powers should just bum rush North Korea and destroy every trace of government there, handing power over to South Korea. The people in North Korea would benefit in the long run even if they're too brainwashed to know it.
Actually the thread title isn't "Unpopular opinions that are actually generally accepted by most people," it's just unpopular opinions. No shit my ideas don't seem likable. I stand by these ideas 100% no matter how ignorant because I have a little something called stupidity, uh I mean integrity.eevangoh said:SNIP-