Update: Diablo III's Loot 2.0 Breakdown - Less, Better, More Epic

Ticklefist

New member
Jul 19, 2010
487
0
0
chikusho said:
ticklefist said:
They acknowledged this problem in a wordy blog post over half a year ago! Now their fix is being withheld as a selling point for their recently announced expansion? Given their turn around time between announcement and release this is a bit frustrating.
- "Game system changes in Diablo III: Reaper of Souls such as loot 2.0 and the new Paragon system will be released as a free patch for the base game."

I.E, now their fix is being implemented for everyone parallel to the release of the recently announced expansion.
Yep. Said nothing to the contrary. My point is that they want to truck it out in tandem with the expansion so when people come back for it they're generating a new box sale as well.
 

Colt47

New member
Oct 31, 2012
1,065
0
0
Jandau said:
If the loot drops are fixed so one can get what's needed to play the game by actually playing the game instead of fishing on the AH, I might give D3 a shot. Everything I've heard points to a solid game with good gameplay that's needlessly dragged down by its surrounding mechanics (drops, AH, etc.)...
It was definitely like that on release. If someone was playing as a sorceress they'd likely get gear for every other conceivable class except their own the majority of the time just so that there is fuel for the AH system.
 

Flutterbrave

New member
Dec 10, 2009
95
0
0
ticklefist said:
chikusho said:
ticklefist said:
They acknowledged this problem in a wordy blog post over half a year ago! Now their fix is being withheld as a selling point for their recently announced expansion? Given their turn around time between announcement and release this is a bit frustrating.
- "Game system changes in Diablo III: Reaper of Souls such as loot 2.0 and the new Paragon system will be released as a free patch for the base game."

I.E, now their fix is being implemented for everyone parallel to the release of the recently announced expansion.
Yep. Said nothing to the contrary. My point is that they want to truck it out in tandem with the expansion so when people come back for it they're generating a new box sale as well.
While you're probably right, I don't really see anything wrong in doing that.

"Hey guys, look at this new cool free stuff! By the way, we're selling an expansion pack now too!"

It's just smart business, assuming that they haven't literally had this patch ready to go for a year and have been sitting on it until they were ready to release RoS
 

schmulki

New member
Oct 10, 2012
101
0
0
Great! They're finally fixing the loot system! Now, they just have to fix....

-PvP
-Cookie-cutter builds and no real feel of customization
-No real end-game content other than "same shit you played before, only now it kills you REALLY fast"
-Social aspects being awful (lack of anything out-of-game, lack of being able to name games, voice chat, or guild-support)


Get back to me once all that's resolved and then I might be interested in putting good money after bad. Till then, I think I've gotten everything I will out of D3.
 

seditary

New member
Aug 17, 2008
625
0
0
Why is there no mention of Paragon Points in the article?

From what they've outlined, they're fixing almost every problem I had with the game. Hopefully it turns out like they say because y'know, Blizzard.
 

Eric the Orange

Gone Gonzo
Apr 29, 2008
3,245
0
0
Lovely Mixture said:
We can only wait and see how much of this will ring true.
[http://imgur.com/TfoNygI]

But at least people will be getting a more Diablo-esque experience.
A lot of those things (like the skill trees and upgradeable skill runes) were taken out because they weren't working for the game. The pre-release logs talk about why. And the enchantress was always planned to be put in in the future.
 

Kinitawowi

New member
Nov 21, 2012
575
0
0
Lovely Mixture said:
We can only wait and see how much of this will ring true.
[http://imgur.com/TfoNygI]

But at least people will be getting a more Diablo-esque experience.
that picture said:
SHE WAS CUT BECAUSE SHE WAS APPARENTLY "TOO SIMILAR TO BEING ABLE TO ADD SOCKETS AND GEMS WITH THE JEWELER" (THE REAL REASON IS BECAUSE THEY ARE JEWS)
The Mystic (Karyna - the one you rescue from Queen Araenae's web in Act I) still has art, and most of the rest of this picture has a case - only four gems feels horribly stunted - but those parentheses cost this picture any right it might have had to exist. Seriously, WTF?
 

Jadak

New member
Nov 4, 2008
2,136
0
0
Jandau said:
If the loot drops are fixed so one can get what's needed to play the game by actually playing the game instead of fishing on the AH, I might give D3 a shot. Everything I've heard points to a solid game with good gameplay that's needlessly dragged down by its surrounding mechanics (drops, AH, etc.)...
More appropriate loot will be good, but best case scenario is that playing the game without the Ah will be 'possible'. The nature of the thing still means that it's always going to be faster, more practical, and way the fuck less fun to just hop over to the AH.

Hopefully at the very least the changes make it so a little less self control is needed to avoid the thing.
 

00slash00

New member
Dec 29, 2009
2,321
0
0
It's definitely a step in the right direction. The garbage loot drops and the auction house are what ruined the game for me. With these improved loot mechanics, if they also get rid of the auction house (as unlikely as that is), I will happily come running back to Diablo 3
 

fwiffo

New member
Sep 12, 2011
113
0
0
"The basic philosophy [of loot 2.0] is we wanna make sure that playing the game is the most fun, the most rewarding way to get items."

I'm sorry but it seems a little fucked up that its taking 2 years from release to figure this out.

/tinfoil hat on

It seems like the RMAH isn't making much money these days. Now they're ready to make the game actually rewarding, after they've got all they can out of the suckers who bought gold/items.

Blizzard can just change some droprate numbers, patch in features and areas withheld from the original launch, and rake in some more cash.

On top of that, they have hearthstone. Another grind till you puke, or pay way more than $60 game.

If that wasn't enough, a cash shop for a sub mmo. Its ok cuz its vanity items right?!?

Blizzard is becoming zynga.

/tinfoil hat off

I've put a bit of time in diablo 3. Enough time. Better items won't change that fact. Too many other better games/things to do.
 

Xeorm

New member
Apr 13, 2010
361
0
0
Meh. They certainly seem like improvements, but the way it shipped and especially their initial patch cycles really showed that they didn't understand what game genre the Diablo series exists in, and I feel their further efforts will be hampered by being built on a terribly rocky foundation.

They've certainly salvaged some and built a better game with their patches, so maybe I'll try it eventually, but I don't really have much hope in that.
 

shintakie10

New member
Sep 3, 2008
1,342
0
0
schmulki said:
Great! They're finally fixing the loot system! Now, they just have to fix....

-PvP
-Cookie-cutter builds and no real feel of customization
-No real end-game content other than "same shit you played before, only now it kills you REALLY fast"
-Social aspects being awful (lack of anything out-of-game, lack of being able to name games, voice chat, or guild-support)


Get back to me once all that's resolved and then I might be interested in putting good money after bad. Till then, I think I've gotten everything I will out of D3.
I'm confused what you mean by cookie-cutter builds. Is there one or two absolute "best" builds per class? Probably, but Blizzard usually fixes it so its not absolutely required (CM wizards have been nerfed almost every single patch for instance). However that doesn't mean other stuff isn't usable. I've been slowly gearin up a Spectral Blade Wizard since I hit 60 and while it does require a specific amount of gear, it works quite well (seen it in action at high MP levels as well, looks absolutely amazin).

Heck, I've even see a Witch Doctor effectively use Hex: Angry Chicken in mid range MP levels and that's considered to be the worst rune in the entire game (damage wise, awesome wise nothin beats turnin into a giant Chicken).

From the amount of research I've done on this, there's more viable builds in D3 than there ever were in D2 and they all play radically different.
 

oldtaku

New member
Jan 7, 2011
639
0
0
Really, this sounds like what 1.0 should have been. Balance the game for your players, not for the f@#4ing auction house(s).
 

Aeshi

New member
Dec 22, 2009
2,640
0
0
So when WoW (or heck, any MMO) does this sort of thing its "OMG THEY'RE DUMBING DOWN FOR THE ME ME ME NOW NOW NOW KIDDIE CASUALS" but when D3 does it it's "Oh good?"
 

chikusho

New member
Jun 14, 2011
873
0
0
ticklefist said:
chikusho said:
ticklefist said:
They acknowledged this problem in a wordy blog post over half a year ago! Now their fix is being withheld as a selling point for their recently announced expansion? Given their turn around time between announcement and release this is a bit frustrating.
- "Game system changes in Diablo III: Reaper of Souls such as loot 2.0 and the new Paragon system will be released as a free patch for the base game."

I.E, now their fix is being implemented for everyone parallel to the release of the recently announced expansion.
Yep. Said nothing to the contrary. My point is that they want to truck it out in tandem with the expansion so when people come back for it they're generating a new box sale as well.
You're implying that the free patch is a selling point for a paid expansion, which makes no sense.
What does make sense is to include as many changes, fixes and added content in one major patch, to make the implementation and down-time as short, smooth and efficient as possible.
Considering the large amount of overhauls, fixes and added content that has been continuously patched in since the games release, the notion that they are withholding this as a selling point is rather unlikely.
If they really wanted to generate interest in the expansion, they would release it in advance so people can get back ito the game and experience the difference for themselves before they put money down.
 

weirdee

Swamp Weather Balloon Gas
Apr 11, 2011
2,634
0
0
The way they refer to "smart drops" largely implies that the prior situation involved an immense level of stupidity in order to put stat boosts that don't make sense on everything, which almost warrants adding "stupid" to the front of every job title in the company.

I mean, even TERRARIA figured this out.
 

Jadak

New member
Nov 4, 2008
2,136
0
0
weirdguy said:
The way they refer to "smart drops" largely implies that the prior situation involved an immense level of stupidity in order to put stat boosts that don't make sense on everything, which almost warrants adding "stupid" to the front of every job title in the company.

I mean, even TERRARIA figured this out.
This has kind of had me laughing too, them coining the term 'smart drops' as if it's a new innovation for the game, a new feature that will make make everything better. And sure, maybe it will, but their trying to pass it off as an 'upgrade' when is a joke, when in reality it's more of a 'fix'.
 

Rattja

New member
Dec 4, 2012
452
0
0
Alright, all good I think.
A bit confused as to how common items are more rare than anything but legendarys but okey.

Now what I want to know is this:
- Where is the PvP they promised?
- What about set items?
- Why couldn't they just use the soul/accountbind system that they used in WoW from the beginning? It's why the AH works in WoW...
 

thisbymaster

New member
Sep 10, 2008
373
0
0
It all depends on how much the new expansion is. I like most of what they said but I liked what they said about D3 when it first came out so I will have to wait for it come out.