BoredAussieGamer said:
To everyone still complaining about how the first one is "objectively superior" and whining about that not being given out for free, here's a scenario to think about.
Someone is giving out free apples. There is nothing wrong with these apples, there is no sinister ulterior motive, this person is just giving out free apples for the sake of being nice.
Here are two reasonable options in this situation:
1: You accept the free apple and act gratefully.
2: You politely decline for whatever reasons you may have (not hungry, already possessing a great deal of apples, preferring oranges)
Both of those are perfectly acceptable.
However, YOU DO NOT ***** AND MOAN ABOUT HOW ORANGES ARE THE SUPERIOR FRUIT AND COMPLAIN THAT THOSE AREN'T BEING OFFERED FOR FREE!
Except that there is a sinister motive, because this person is trying to promote their apple store and distract you from the far superior apple store that has been sitting around in atrophy for years on end.
For those that don't know, for
some reason Valve take every opportunity to promote L4D2 and just leave L4D1 behind, L4D2 constantly has ridiculous sales and promotions like this, while the first doesn't.
It seems pretty obvious to me that they're trying to keep L4D2 up in popularity and lure people away from L4D1 because they think a third game would only be viable if L4D2 stays popular, and people sticking to the original undermines their attempts to make it into a franchise.